scholarly journals Spinal Anaesthesia—Early Australian Experience

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Mcbride

Australia in 1902 was a fledgling colony in its second year of Federation with a population of around 3.7 million. European settlement had been largely confined to the coastal margins of this enormous land mass, although some bold adventurers in search of gold and farmland had struggled their way into the interior. Horsham, situated 300 km northwest of Melbourne in the state of Victoria, was founded in June 1849. By 1902 the town, with a population of around 2500, had grown to boast a hospital, two doctors, a pharmacist and a dentist. It was at the Horsham Hospital on January 7, 1902 that Dr Robert Ritchie performed Australia's first recorded spinal anaesthetic. Ritchie performed a lumbar puncture at the L3–4 level, injected 2 ml of 2% cocaine solution and waited for a total of 20 minutes before realising that the sensation the patient was feeling when he pinched him was pressure, not pain. The 78-year-old man with a gangrenous right leg, prostatic obstruction and congestive cardiac failure was laid supine, and had his right leg amputated through the thigh while being administered brandy and water. Strychnine injections were administered four hourly postoperatively. The adoption of the technique of spinal anaesthesia spread quickly in Australia despite communication difficulties at that time.

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. e23.1-e23
Author(s):  
S. Apiliogullari ◽  
A. Duman ◽  
F. Gök ◽  
Oztin C. Ogun ◽  
I. Akillioglu

Author(s):  
R Heard ◽  
P Clements

Patients with a fractured neck of femur require effective analgesia to improve positioning before the administration of spinal anaesthetic. This article discusses the evidence to show whether fascia iliaca compartment block or intravenous opioid analgesia is preferable in this situation.


1986 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
J G Jenkins

Unilateral block is a rare complication of spinal anaesthesia. A case where a unilateral block occurred following the administration of a spinal anaesthetic, and where a second spinal anaesthetic to complete the block was successfully administered, is reported. The possible causes of unilateral block are discussed.


2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (Sup 1) ◽  
pp. e23
Author(s):  
S. Apiliogullari ◽  
A. Duman ◽  
F. Gök ◽  
Oztin C. Ogun ◽  
I. Akillioglu

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Longshaw ◽  
W Gallagher ◽  
A Dickinson

Abstract Introduction General anaesthetic has traditionally been felt to be more appropriate than spinal anaesthesia for patients undergoing ureteroscopy as it is difficult to achieve a suitably high block. During the COVID-19 pandemic, our centre moved elective operating to an alternative day-case surgical environment where the anaesthetic team performed predominantly spinal anaesthesia and were therefore very experienced with this modality. In view of concerns of COVID-19 transmission by aerosolisation during the intubation and extubation phases of general anaesthetic, spinal anaesthesia as an alternative first line modality was trialled with the option of converting to general anaesthesia if surgery could not be achieved safely and comfortably for the patient. Method During a three-month period, unless contraindicated, spinal anaesthesia was used as the first line anaesthetic for ureteroscopy cases. A retrospective study of outcomes was then undertaken. Results 44 patients were treated with a conversion rate to general anaesthetic of 9% (n = 4). There was a complication rate of 20% (n = 9); 4 partial procedures, 4 readmissions with symptomatic residual fragments or sepsis and 1 patient required post-operative overnight stay due to anaesthetic. Spinal anaesthetic time averaged 25minutes. Conclusions The global COVID-19 pandemic has led to change in practice and we have demonstrated that spinal anaesthesia is a valuable alternative to general anaesthetic in the majority of ureteroscopy cases. When undertaken by an experienced anaesthetic team, using this method does not significantly add to procedure time.


BMJ ◽  
1943 ◽  
Vol 2 (4316) ◽  
pp. 389-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Burton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document