dural puncture
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1100
(FIVE YEARS 269)

H-INDEX

42
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Author(s):  
Karan Morje ◽  
Manna Debnath ◽  
Akhlaque Ahmad ◽  
Santosh Ojha

Aim: The main purpose of this present study is to determine the effects of sitting (S) and lateral (L) position during spinal anaesthesia on patient satisfaction, Post dural puncture headache (PDPH), Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV). Study Design: Prospective comparative study Place and Duration of Study: Charusat Healthcare and Research foundation (CHRF), Changa, Gujarat, between September 2021 to November 2021. Methodology: A total of 50 female volunteers who were above the age of 18 years, had an American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) status of I & II and those who have undergone hysterectomy surgery are included in this study. The patients were categorized into two groups, group S (n=25) and group L (n=25). Patients were asked about PONV 4 hours after surgery and the possibility of PDPH on post-operative days 1 and 2. The study was analysed by using descriptive statistics, chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: When comparing the incidence of PDPH on post-operative day 1 and day 2, there is a statistically significant difference between the Sitting (group S) and Lateral decubitus (group L) groups (P-value= 0.14 and.001). On the other hand, there is no statistical significant difference found for PONV when compared between both the groups (P- value= .776). Conclusion: Spinal anaesthesia with lateral decubitus position has better outcomes than sitting position for the incidence of Post dural puncture headache. However, there is no difference in both groups for PONV.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 3116-3118
Author(s):  
Gulsher . ◽  
Riffat Zahid ◽  
Syed Mehmood Ali ◽  
Muhammad Naveed Shahzad ◽  
Amer Latif ◽  
...  

Objective: To compare the frequency of post dural puncture headache with Quincke 25G and Quincke 27G of spinal needles for spinal anesthesia. Design of the Study: It’s a Randomized control trial. Study Settings: This study was carried out Department of anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Shaikh Zayed Hospital Lahore from 29-08-2020 to 01-03-2021. Material and Methods: In this prospective study 100 patients were enrolled who were decided to undergo spinal anesthesia. Two groups were made by randomization. In patients of group I, anesthesia was administered by using 25G quincke needle while 27G quincke needle was used for patients in group II. Evaluation of patients was with regard to development of postoperative PDPH within 3-days. Groups were compared by using Chi-square test and a P-value<0.05 was taken statistically significant. Results of the Study: PDHD was seen in 14 (28%) patients in group I and in 4 (8%) patients in group II. Statistically, the difference between the two groups was significant (p<0.05).. Conclusion: Due to less frequency of PDPH with 27G needle, it should be given preference for applying spinal anesthesia over 25G needle. Keywords: Spinal anesthesia, post dural puncture headache; quincle needle.


Author(s):  
Maryam Vosoughian ◽  
Shideh Dabir ◽  
Mastaneh Dahi ◽  
Mohammadreza Moshari

In this report, we presented our experience in treating severe postpartum post-dural puncture headache with low-dose propofol. Short-term use of low-dose propofol provided rapid and complete relief of the headache without recurrence.


Author(s):  
Salvatore Gulizia ◽  
Emanuele D’Amico ◽  
Francesco Patti ◽  
Mario Zappia

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Reza Safarpour ◽  
Manoosh Mehrabi ◽  
Firoozeh Tarkesh ◽  
Hadis Ashrafizadeh ◽  
Abbasali Keshtkar ◽  
...  

Objectives: Post-dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) is prevalent among individuals undergoing lumbar punctures. The non-invasive effect of some drugs, such as aminophylline on PDPH has been investigated in several clinical studies. As there is no comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis about the preventive and therapeutic effects of aminophylline on PDPH in the literature, the clinical effectiveness of this drug on the prevention and/or treatment of PDPH will be assessed in this study. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, WoS (Clarivate Analytics), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and Google Scholar as electronic databases will be precisely searched for clinical studies that assessed the effect of aminophylline on PDPH. Studies between 01-01-1980 and 30-06-2020 will be evaluated in this study, and there will not be any language restrictions. Contradictions between the reviewers within any phase of the study (screening, selecting, quality assessment, and data extraction) will be resolved by consensus; in case of unsolved disagreements, a third reviewer will eventually decide. The combination method will be applied according to the methodological resemblance in the selected articles using the Random Effect Model or the Fixed Effect Model. Also, for the included articles, forest plots will be drawn. For assessing statistical heterogeneity, the I2 statistic and the Q-statistic test will be applied. In addition, funnel plots will be used for assessing non-significant study effects and potential reporting bias. Furthermore, Egger’s and Begg’s tests will be done, and publication bias will be indicated by significant findings (P < 0.05). Conclusions: It is expected that the results of this study will be of benefit to researchers and clinicians for managing PDPH, and will be reported in conferences and publications.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Lacombe ◽  
Kristi Downey ◽  
Xiang Y. Ye ◽  
Jose C.A. Carvalho

Introduction: Epidural analgesia is the preferred method to manage pain during labor and delivery. The insertion of the epidural catheter can be complicated by unintentional dural puncture that may result in postdural puncture headache. There is limited evidence on the long term implications of this complication. We sought to investigate if women who sustained a dural puncture have a higher risk of developing chronic headache, low back pain and visual or auditory impairment. Methods: We conducted a 1:1 case-control study with women who delivered at our institution from January 2015 to December 2019. Cases were women who received epidural analgesia and sustained an unintentional dural puncture and controls were women who received epidural analgesia but did not sustain such complication. We matched cases and controls for date of delivery, age, and BMI. All women completed an online survey with validated questionnaires for diagnosis of chronic headache and chronic back pain. We used dichotomic (yes/no) questions to look for the presence of chronic visual and auditory impairment. Results: Sixty-three case-control pairs were studied. Women who sustained a dural puncture during their epidural catheter insertion had a higher risk of developing chronic headache [14.3%, versus 4.8%, p=0.049, AOR: 3.36 (1.05, 12.82)] and chronic back pain [39.7% versus 19.1%, p=0.009, AOR: 2.67 (1.25, 5.72)] than women who did not sustain a dural puncture. The incidence of chronic auditory impairment was also higher in the dural puncture group [14.3% versus 1.6%, p=0.007, AOR: 9.98 (1.21, 82.62)]. Conclusions: An unintentional dural puncture during epidural catheter insertion in parturients is associated with increased risk of chronic headache, back pain and auditory impairment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashok Jadon ◽  
Surabhi Srivastawa ◽  
Neelam Sinha ◽  
Swastika Chakraborty ◽  
Apoorva Bakshi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique is relatively a new technique of labor analgesia and has been advocated with the advantage of faster onset of pain relief. However, there are differences of opinion regarding the efficacy of the DPE technique and the size of the spinal needle to be used for the DPE. Various studies have suggested that DPE can only be done with a larger gauge of a spinal needle; however, recent studies have variable observations. We have compared the conventional lumbar epidural analgesia and DPE using a 27G pencil-point needle to assess the efficacy of DPE and its possible side effects. Results The time to achieve a 50% reduction in VAS was 7.06 ± 0.79 min in group CLE (n = 15) and 5.0 ± 1.06 min in group DPE (n = 15) (difference of two means was 2.06, 95% CI [1.36, 2.75], t = 5.99, p < 0.0001). The time to achieve VAS < 3 in group CLE was 14.93 ± 1.98 min, and in the group DPE, it was 10.13 ± 1.45 min (difference of two means was 4.8, 95% CI [3.52, 6.09], t = 7.55, p < 0.0001). The mode of delivery, APGAR scores, and side effects were comparable (p > 0.05). Conclusions DPE provided faster relief of labor pain than the conventional labor epidural analgesia. There were no added side effects by DPE in conventional lumbar epidural analgesia for labor. A 27G Whitacre pencil-point needle can be used for DPE. Trial registration CTRI, CTRI/2020/08/027060. Registered on 10/08/2020. Trial registered prospectively. CTRI website URL: http://ctri.nic.in


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document