Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes for Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone and Hamstring-Tendon Autografts

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (14) ◽  
pp. 3531-3540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dany Mouarbes ◽  
Jacques Menetrey ◽  
Vincent Marot ◽  
Louis Courtot ◽  
Emilie Berard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Donor Site Pain ◽  
Site Pain

Background: Comprehensive studies evaluating quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are lacking. The optimal choice of graft between bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB), hamstring tendon (HT), and QT is still debatable. Hypothesis: The current literature supports the use of QT as a strong autograft with good outcomes when used in ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Ovid databases to identify published articles on clinical studies relevant to ACL reconstruction with QT autograft and studies comparing QT autograft versus BPTB and HT autografts. The results of the eligible studies were analyzed in terms of instrumented laxity measurements, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Lysholm score, objective and subjective International Knee Documentation committee (IKDC) scores, donor-site pain, and graft failure. Results: Twenty-seven clinical studies including 2856 patients with ACL reconstruction met the inclusion criteria. Comparison of 581 QT versus 514 BPTB autografts showed no significant differences in terms of instrumented mean side-to-side difference ( P = .45), Lachman test ( P = .76), pivot-shift test grade 0 ( P = .23), pivot-shift test grade 0 or 1 ( P = .85), mean Lysholm score ( P = .1), mean subjective IKDC score ( P = .36), or graft failure ( P = .50). However, outcomes in favor of QT were found in terms of less donor-site pain (risk ratio for QT vs BPTB groups, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.18-0.36; P < .00001). Comparison of 181 QT versus 176 HT autografts showed no significant differences in terms of instrumented mean side-to-side difference ( P = .75), Lachman test ( P = .41), pivot-shift test grade 0 ( P = .53), Lysholm score less than 84 ( P = .53), mean subjective IKDC score ( P = .13), donor-site pain ( P = .40), or graft failure ( P = .46). However, outcomes in favor of QT were found in terms of mean Lysholm score (mean difference between QT and HT groups, 3.81; 95% CI, 0.45-7.17; P = .03). Conclusion: QT autograft had comparable clinical and functional outcomes and graft survival rate compared with BPTB and HT autografts. However, QT autograft showed significantly less harvest site pain compared with BPTB autograft and better functional outcome scores compared with HT autograft.

scholarly journals Outcomes of single bundle arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a limited resource setting

2020 ◽  
pp. jisakos-2020-000500
Author(s):  
Binod Sherchan ◽  
Saroj Rai ◽  
Nira Tamang ◽  
Siddhartha Dhungana ◽  
Laxmi Kanta Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graft Failure ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Urban Group ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Rural Group

ObjectivesDespite various challenges, orthopaedic sports surgeons are still providing the arthroscopic service in low-income and middle-income countries like Nepal; however, it is hardly being reported. The main purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in the urban group and that of the rural group.MethodsWe evaluated a total of 194 patients, including 98 patients in the urban group and 96 patients in the rural group, undergoing arthroscopic ACLR between August 2015 and February 2018, and had completed a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Subjective evaluations were performed using the Tegner-Lysolm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form. Laxity assessments were performed using the Lachman test and the Pivot-shift test. Functional evaluation included the range of motion, single-leg hop test and overall IKDC score. Radiological assessment was performed according to the IKDC guidelines. SPSS was used for data analysis.ResultsThere was statistically significant differences in the subjective assessments between 2 groups. No statistically significant differences existed between 2 groups in terms of laxity and functional assessments. However, the proportion of laxity, in terms of Lachman test and Pivot-shift test, was higher in the young and active individuals and the proportion of abnormal and severely abnormal in all parameters of functional outcomes was higher in the older female in the rural group. Graft failure occurred in 19 (17.6%) knees in the urban group and 17 (16.8%) knees in the rural group. Graft failure in the urban group was higher in young and active male patients, whereas failure in the rural group was more in female patients. Similarly, overall infection occurred in 13 (6.2%) knees, including 5 (2.3%) deep infections and 8 (3.8%) superficial infections.ConclusionWe advised similar rehabilitation protocol for all the patients; however, the outcomes were significantly lower in patients living in rural areas as they are found to have poor compliance with the rehabilitation protocol. The overall graft failure rate was 17.2%; however, the reoperation rate was higher in the urban group than the rural group. The rate of deep infection was higher in the rural group as compared with the urban group.Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study.

scholarly journals Comparison between functional outcome of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single bundle six fold and four fold semitendinosus and gracilis graft

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 220
Author(s):  
Rahul G. Jaju ◽  
Jeevan B. Tonde
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Anterior Drawer Test ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">With increase participation in sports activities, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a common and functionally disabling injury. Hamstring tendon as autografts for arthroscopic ACL reconstructions have shown good clinical and functional outcome in patients. The purpose of present study was to compare the functional outcome of arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using single bundle six fold and four fold ST and G graft.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">This was a prospective study conducted between period June 2008 to December 2010.181 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction were screened and 113 patients fulfilling the inclusion exclusion criteria were selected for the study</span>.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">All patients completed a minimum of 1 years follow up. In 4 fold group 27.50% were having grade 1 anterior drawer test 22.50% were having grade 1 Lachman test and 17.50% had grade 1 pivot shift test as compared to 6 fold group 6.66% had grade 1 anterior drawer test, 11.66% had grade 1 Lachman test, and 3.33% had grade 1 pivot shift test respectively which was statistically significant (p&lt;0.05). </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using six fold graft is effective modality of treatment in patient with ACL deficient knee. Six fold graft is thicker in diameter and cross sectional area as compared to four fold graft which occupies more surface area of normal ACL foot print and gives better stability of knee joint in both AP and rotational plane.</span></p><p> </p>

scholarly journals The Anterolateral Structure of the Knee Does Not Affect Anterior and Dynamic Rotatory Stability in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Quantitative Evaluation With the Electromagnetic Measurement System

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (14) ◽  
pp. 3381-3388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Araki ◽  
Takehiko Matsushita ◽  
Yuichi Hoshino ◽  
Kanto Nagai ◽  
Kyohei Nishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Electromagnetic Measurement System ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Electromagnetic Measurement ◽  
Tibial Translation ◽  
Acl Deficient

Background: The biomechanical function of the anterolateral structure (ALS), which includes the anterolateral joint capsule and anterolateral ligament (ALL), remains a topic of debate. Hypothesis: The ALS contributes to knee joint stability during the Lachman test and the pivot-shift test in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–deficient knees. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Fourteen fresh-frozen hemipelvis lower limbs were used. For 7 specimens, the anterior one-third of the ALS and the residual ALS were cut intra-articularly with a radiofrequency device. Subsequently, the ACL was cut arthroscopically. For the other 7 specimens, the ACL was cut first, followed by the anterior one-third of the ALS and the residual ALS intra-articularly. During the procedures, the iliotibial band (ITB) was kept intact. At each condition, the anterior tibial translation (ATT) during the manual Lachman test and the acceleration of posterior tibial translation (APT) and the posterior tibial translation (PTT) during the manual pivot-shift test were measured quantitatively with an electromagnetic measurement system. The mean values of those parameters were compared among 6 groups (ACL intact, one-third ALS cut, all ALS cut, ACL cut, ACL/one-third ALS cut, and ACL/all ALS cut). Results: The mean ATTs during the Lachman test and the mean APTs and PTTs in the ACL-cut conditions (ACL cut, ACL/one-third ALS cut, and ACL/all ALS cut) were significantly larger than those under the ACL-intact conditions (ACL intact, one-third ALS cut, all ALS cut) ( P < .01). However, no statistically significant differences were observed among the intact, one-third ALS–cut, and all ALS–cut conditions, within the ACL-intact or ACL-cut conditions. Conclusion: Intra-articular dissection of the ALS did not increase the ATT during the Lachman test or the APT and PTT during the pivot-shift test under the intact condition of the ITB, regardless of the integrity of the ACL. When the ITB is intact, the ALS does not have a significant role in either anterior or dynamic rotatory knee stability, while the ACL does. Clinical Relevance: Recent growing interest about ALL reconstruction or ALS augmentation may not have a large role in controlling either anterior or dynamic rotatory knee instability in isolated ACL-deficient knees.

scholarly journals Preoperative Knee Instability Affects Residual Instability as Evaluated by Quantitative Pivot-Shift Measurements During Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596712095902
Author(s):  
Yusuke Kawanishi ◽  
Masahiro Nozaki ◽  
Makoto Kobayashi ◽  
Sanshiro Yasuma ◽  
Hiroaki Fukushima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Angular Velocity ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Double Bundle ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Important Indicator ◽  
Quantitative Measurements ◽  
Double Bundle Acl Reconstruction

Background: The pivot-shift test is an important indicator of functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Preoperative instability as indicated by the pivot-shift test is associated with residual instability after ACLR. Few studies have used quantitative means to evaluate the pivot shift after ACLR. Purpose: To investigate the relationship between preoperative and residual instability and to identify the risk factors for residual instability by using quantitative measurements of the pivot shift. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 91 patients undergoing primary double-bundle ACLR were retrospectively enrolled. Quantitative measurements of instability for ACL-deficient knees (ACLD) and uninjured contralateral knees (intact) preoperatively, as well as ACLR knees intraoperatively, were performed under general anesthesia using the pivot-shift test, with inertial sensors to measure acceleration and external rotational (ER) angular velocity. The ratios of intact to ACLD (ACLD/I) and intact to ACLR (ACLR/I) were measured. Patients who showed an ACLR/I of >1 were classified into the residual instability group, and those with an ACLR/I of ≤1 were classified into the noninstability group. Regarding demographic, surgical, and quantitative measurement factors, between-group comparisons and multivariate logistic regression were conducted for predictors of residual instability. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the correlations between ACLD/I and ACLR/I and the cutoff value of ACLD/I in predicting residual instability. Results: The predictive factors for intraoperative residual instability included female sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.3 [95% CI, 0.1-0.9]; P = .034) and ACLD/I for acceleration (OR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.2-2.1]; P < .001), and ACLD/I for ER angular velocity (OR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.2-3.1]; P = .013). Correlations between ACLD/I and ACLR/I were moderate with respect to both acceleration ( r = 0.435; P < .001) and ER angular velocity ( r = 0.533; P < .001). The cutoff points for ACLD/I were 4.9 for acceleration (sensitivity, 65.1%; specificity, 85.7%; area under the curve [AUC], 0.76) and 2.4 for ER angular velocity (sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 50.0%; AUC, 0.74). Conclusion: Greater preoperative instability was a risk factor for residual instability as measured intraoperatively by a quantitatively evaluation in the pivot shift during ACL reconstruction. Quantitative measurements of instability during the pivot shift mechanism under general anesthesia may enable surgeons to predict postoperative residual instability.

scholarly journals The Clinical Efficacy and Risk Factors after Revision and Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Shuai Miao ◽  
Shuoda Li ◽  
Zhonggao Wu ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Ming Li
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Medial Meniscus ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Sports Injury ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Meniscus Suture ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

The aim of this study was to study the clinical efficacy and prognostic factors after revision and reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament. All the patients who underwent the first revision of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the department of sports medicine from January 2001 to December 2015 were collected. The demographic information, the first revision and reconstruction information of ACL, and the information during the first ACL reconstruction were collected. A total of 335 cases were included. Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, and IKDC subjective score at the last follow-up were significantly higher than those before operation. Compared with graft failure caused by sports injury, the postoperative scores of patients with revision due to life accidents or initial reconstruction techniques were significantly lower ( P < 0.05 ). The postoperative Lysholm score of patients with femoral canal drilling through the tibial canal was lower than that of patients with anterior internal approach. The postoperative IKDC score of patients who underwent medial meniscus suture at the same time was higher than that of patients without meniscus combined injury. ACL revision can improve the stability and function of knee joint. Compared with the revision caused by life accident or technical reasons of primary reconstruction surgery, the patients with graft failure caused by sports injury have better postoperative recovery. Medial meniscus suture and anterior internal approach drilling of the femoral bone canal have a statistically protective effect on the clinical function after ACL revision.

scholarly journals Functional result of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by remnant preservation in a tertiary center in Eastern India

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 820
Author(s):  
Ritwik Ganguli ◽  
Swagatam Jash
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Remnant Preservation ◽  
Graft Rupture ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most common procedures in orthopaedics. Orthopaedic surgery is vastly evolving to give better functional outcome. Apart from stability, proprioception, ligament healing are important factors for return to sports. The presence of remnant containing mechanoreceptors and free neural endings can help reinnervate the ACL auto graft. Aims and objectives were to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with remnant preservation.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: One hundred and six patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between April 2014 and March 2020. Among these 80 patients underwent remnant preservation. Analysis is done based on international knee documentation committee score (IKDC), modified Cincinnati knee rating system (MCKRS) and Tegner-Lysholm scoring system. Other factors are Lachman test, pivot shift test, return to sports and graft rupture rate.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Lachman test became negative in 98% at 12 weeks and in all the patients at 24 months post-operatively. 74 patients (92.5%) among 80 patients develop full range of knee movement after ACL surgery. Post-operative scores are 95, 93, and 92 respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remnant preserving ACL reconstruction having excellent clinical outcome with good knee stability, early return to sports activities and no incidence of graft rupture in our series.</p>

Accessory Anteromedial Portal may not Provide Clinically Superior Results Compared with the Anteromedial Portal in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (08) ◽  
pp. 716-722
Author(s):  
Shu-Ming Ye ◽  
Jue-Hua Jing ◽  
Hao Lv ◽  
Ji-Sen Zhang ◽  
Xin-Zhong Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Anteromedial Portal ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

AbstractTechniques using the anteromedial portal (AMP) and accessory anteromedial portal (AAMP) are commonly used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The aim of this study was to investigate the radiological and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction using the AMP or AAMP technique to drill the femoral tunnel. The records of 157 patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction using the AMP or AAMP technique between 2011 and 2015 were reviewed. The femoral tunnel clock-face position and femoral tunnel and tibial tunnel anterior–posterior (AP) inclination angles were assessed on axial or AP magnetic resonance images. At last follow-up, the Lachman test and pivot-shift test were used to evaluate AP and rotational stability, respectively. The Lysholm knee scoring scale and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form were used to evaluate clinical and functional results. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in patient age, sex, follow-up period, or affected side distribution. The mean femoral tunnel inclination angle was 31.13 ± 8.06 degrees in the AMP group and 30.17 ± 9.02 degrees in the AAMP group (p = 0.513). The tibial tunnel inclination angle in the AMP group (16.28 ± 7.89 degrees) was not different from that in the AAMP group (13.70 ± 6.08 degrees). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Lysholm knee scoring scale, or IKDC scores. The AAMP technique was not clinically superior to the AMP technique in ACL reconstruction. This is a retrospective comparative study and its level of evidence is III.

Increased Postoperative Manual Knee Laxity at 2 Years Results in Inferior Long-term Subjective Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 2632-2645 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Sundemo ◽  
Ninni Sernert ◽  
Jüri Kartus ◽  
Eric Hamrin Senorski ◽  
Eleonor Svantesson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Subjective Outcome ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Ikdc Score

Background: Increased postoperative rotatory knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may be associated with an increased risk of osteoarthritis and inferior subjective outcome, although long-term studies are lacking. In terms of anteroposterior knee laxity, this association has not yet been established. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to investigate whether postoperative knee laxity is associated with inferior long-term outcome in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. The hypothesis was that increased laxity would cause an inferior long-term clinical and radiographic outcome. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 193 patients underwent ACL reconstruction and were examined at both 2 and 16 years postoperatively. At the 2-year follow-up, knee laxity was tested by use of the Lachman test, the anterior drawer test, the pivot-shift test, and the KT-1000 arthrometer. Outcome variables examined at the 16-year follow-up involved a radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis, patient-reported outcome measurements, and the single-legged hop test. Results: At the long-term follow-up, 147 (76%) patients were examined. The mean follow-up period for the included patients was 16.4 ± 1.2 years. A negative Lachman test at 2 years resulted in a superior International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (76.3 ± 19.4 vs 67.8 ± 19.3, P < .05) and Lysholm score (85.2 ± 11.9 vs 76.9 ± 17.8, P < .05) at the 16-year follow-up. Correspondingly, a negative anterior drawer test at 2 years was associated with a superior IKDC score (75.3 ± 18.7 vs 62.9 ± 20.2, P < .05) and Lysholm score (84.1 ± 12.1 vs 72.6 ± 20.2, P < .05) at 16 years. A negative pivot-shift test resulted in a superior IKDC score (74.5 ± 18.8 vs 46.9 ± 17.8, P < .05), a superior Lysholm score (83.3 ± 13.4 vs 58.9 ± 23.0, P < .05), and an increased level of activity (Tegner activity scale, median [range]: 4 [1-10] vs 3 [0-5], P < .05). Osteoarthritis was overrepresented in patients with positive manual knee laxity tests, but the difference was not statistically significant. The KT-1000 arthrometer result was not correlated with any outcome variables assessed in this study. Conclusion: Increased manual anteroposterior and rotatory knee laxity 2 years after ACL reconstruction is associated with an inferior long-term subjective outcome.

Association Between Psychological Readiness and Knee Laxity and Their Predictive Value for Return to Sport in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110218
Author(s):  
Anne Gro Heyn Faleide ◽  
Liv Heide Magnussen ◽  
Bård Erik Bogen ◽  
Torbjørn Strand ◽  
Ingunn Fleten Mo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Deciding when patients are ready to return to sport (RTS) after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is challenging. The understanding of which factors affect readiness and how they may be related is limited. Therefore, despite widespread use of RTS testing, there is a lack of knowledge about which tests are informative on the ability to resume sports. Purpose: To examine whether there is an association between knee laxity and psychological readiness to RTS after ACLR and to evaluate the predictive value of these measures on sports resumption. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients aged ≥16 years engaged in physical activity/sports before injury were recruited at routine clinical assessment 9-12 months after ACLR. Exclusion criteria were concomitant ligament surgery at ACLR and/or previous ACL injury in the contralateral knee. At baseline, a project-specific activity questionnaire and the ACL–Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale were completed. Knee laxity was assessed by use of the Lachman test, KT-1000 arthrometer, and pivot-shift test. Two years after surgery, knee reinjuries and RTS status (the project-specific questionnaire) were registered. Associations between psychological readiness and knee laxity were evaluated with the Spearman rho test, and predictive ability of the ACL-RSI and knee laxity tests were examined using regression analyses. Results: Of 171 patients screened for eligibility, 132 were included in the study. There were small but significant associations between the ACL-RSI score and the Lachman test (rho = −0.18; P = .046) and KT-1000 arthrometer measurement (rho = −0.18; P = .040) but no association between the ACL-RSI and the pivot-shift test at the time of recruitment. Of the total patients, 36% returned to preinjury sport level by 2 years after surgery. Higher age, better psychological readiness, and less anterior tibial displacement (KT-1000 arthrometer measurement) were significant predictors of 2-year RTS (explained variance, 33%). Conclusion: Small but significant associations were found between measurements of psychological readiness and anterior tibial displacement, indicating that patients with less knee laxity after ACLR feel more ready to RTS. ACL-RSI and KT-1000 arthrometer measurements were independent predictors of 2-year RTS and should be considered in RTS assessments after ACLR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document