Preoperative Knee Instability Affects Residual Instability as Evaluated by Quantitative Pivot-Shift Measurements During Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction

Background: The pivot-shift test is an important indicator of functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Preoperative instability as indicated by the pivot-shift test is associated with residual instability after ACLR. Few studies have used quantitative means to evaluate the pivot shift after ACLR. Purpose: To investigate the relationship between preoperative and residual instability and to identify the risk factors for residual instability by using quantitative measurements of the pivot shift. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 91 patients undergoing primary double-bundle ACLR were retrospectively enrolled. Quantitative measurements of instability for ACL-deficient knees (ACLD) and uninjured contralateral knees (intact) preoperatively, as well as ACLR knees intraoperatively, were performed under general anesthesia using the pivot-shift test, with inertial sensors to measure acceleration and external rotational (ER) angular velocity. The ratios of intact to ACLD (ACLD/I) and intact to ACLR (ACLR/I) were measured. Patients who showed an ACLR/I of >1 were classified into the residual instability group, and those with an ACLR/I of ≤1 were classified into the noninstability group. Regarding demographic, surgical, and quantitative measurement factors, between-group comparisons and multivariate logistic regression were conducted for predictors of residual instability. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the correlations between ACLD/I and ACLR/I and the cutoff value of ACLD/I in predicting residual instability. Results: The predictive factors for intraoperative residual instability included female sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.3 [95% CI, 0.1-0.9]; P = .034) and ACLD/I for acceleration (OR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.2-2.1]; P < .001), and ACLD/I for ER angular velocity (OR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.2-3.1]; P = .013). Correlations between ACLD/I and ACLR/I were moderate with respect to both acceleration ( r = 0.435; P < .001) and ER angular velocity ( r = 0.533; P < .001). The cutoff points for ACLD/I were 4.9 for acceleration (sensitivity, 65.1%; specificity, 85.7%; area under the curve [AUC], 0.76) and 2.4 for ER angular velocity (sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 50.0%; AUC, 0.74). Conclusion: Greater preoperative instability was a risk factor for residual instability as measured intraoperatively by a quantitatively evaluation in the pivot shift during ACL reconstruction. Quantitative measurements of instability during the pivot shift mechanism under general anesthesia may enable surgeons to predict postoperative residual instability.

Download Full-text

The Effect of Intraoperative Graft Coverage With Preserved Remnant Tissue on the Results of the Pivot-Shift Test After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Quantitative Evaluations With an Electromagnetic Sensor System

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546517706702 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 45 (10) ◽

pp. 2217-2225 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Nobuto Kitamura ◽

Kazunori Yasuda ◽

Masashi Yokota ◽

Keiko Goto ◽

Susumu Wada ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Pivot Shift ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Double Bundle ◽

Pivot Shift Test ◽

Tissue Preservation ◽

Electromagnetic Sensor ◽

The Mean ◽

Anterior Cruciate ◽

Double Bundle Acl Reconstruction

Background: Remnant tissue preservation may be important in improving graft healing after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but it has yet to be established whether remnant tissue preservation improves the control of pivot-shift laxity. Hypothesis: The amount of ACL graft coverage with preserved remnant tissue improves the control of pivot-shift laxity, as qualitatively determined with an electromagnetic device. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The 3-dimensional kinematics were evaluated intraoperatively using an electromagnetic sensor system in 38 patients at the time of anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with remnant tissue preservation and again at a minimum of 12 months postoperatively. The magnitude of the peak coupled anterior tibial translation (pCAT) and the maximal acceleration of posterior translation (APT) during the pivot-shift test were evaluated. The degree of graft coverage by remnant tissue was determined arthroscopically at the end of surgery, which was evaluated quantitatively using a scoring system (0-9 points). The relationship between the values during the pivot-shift test and preoperative and intraoperative factors were assessed. Results: The mean (±SD) side-to-side difference of the pCAT (ΔpCAT) was significantly ( P < .0001) improved from 14.0 ± 5.0 mm to 2.6 ± 1.1 mm. Also, the mean side-to-side difference of the APT (ΔAPT) was significantly ( P < .0001) improved from 525.6 ± 99.7 mm/s2 to 32.9 ± 23.6 mm/s2. The mean initial graft coverage score was 5.3 ± 2.6. The correlation analysis demonstrated that the degree of initial graft coverage was significantly correlated with the ΔpCAT ( r = −0.517, P = .0007) and ΔAPT ( r = −0.532, P = .0005). The status of the reconstructed graft at second-look arthroscopic surgery showed no significant correlations with the degree of initial graft coverage or the results of the pivot-shift test. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that the preservation of ACL remnant tissue in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction appears to improve the control of pivot-shift laxity at a minimum of 12 months postoperatively, as measured by an electromagnetic device. This improvement was significantly affected by the degree of intraoperative graft coverage with preserved remnant tissue.

Download Full-text

Influence of Bundle Diameter and Attachment Point on Kinematic Behavior in Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Computational Model

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine ◽

10.1155/2014/948292 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 2014 ◽

pp. 1-8 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Oh Soo Kwon ◽

Tserenchimed Purevsuren ◽

Kyungsoo Kim ◽

Won Man Park ◽

Tae-Kyu Kwon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽

Knee Joint ◽

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Double Bundle ◽

Pivot Shift Test ◽

Tibial Rotation ◽

Attachment Point ◽

Anterior Cruciate ◽

Double Bundle Acl Reconstruction

A protocol to choose the graft diameter attachment point of each bundle has not yet been determined since they are usually dependent on a surgeon’s preference. Therefore, the influence of bundle diameters and attachment points on the kinematics of the knee joint needs to be quantitatively analyzed. A three-dimensional knee model was reconstructed with computed tomography images of a 26-year-old man. Based on the model, models of double bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction were developed. The anterior tibial translations for the anterior drawer test and the internal tibial rotation for the pivot shift test were investigated according to variation of bundle diameters and attachment points. For the model in this study, the knee kinematics after the double bundle ACL reconstruction were dependent on the attachment point and not much influenced by the bundle diameter although larger sized anterior-medial bundles provided increased stability in the knee joint. Therefore, in the clinical setting, the bundle attachment point needs to be considered prior to the bundle diameter, and the current selection method of graft diameters for both bundles appears justified.

Download Full-text

Anterolateral ligament reconstruction in addition to primary double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for grade 3 pivot shift improves residual knee instability during surgery

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics ◽

10.1186/s40634-021-00369-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Yusuke Kawanishi ◽

Makoto Kobayashi ◽

Sanshiro Yasuma ◽

Hiroaki Fukushima ◽

Jiro Kato ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Pivot Shift ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Double Bundle ◽

Acl Injuries ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Anterior Cruciate ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Double Bundle Acl Reconstruction

Abstract Purpose High-grade pivot shift in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured knee is a risk factor for postoperative residual pivot shift. Procedures in addition to ACL reconstruction such as anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction have been performed for patients with a high-risk of residual pivot shift. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the addition of ALL reconstruction to primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction in patients with preoperative high-grade pivot shift to improve stability as evaluated by quantitative measurement. Methods Patients with ACL injuries who showed preoperative grade 3 subjective pivot shift and who underwent primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstructions were retrospectively enrolled. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) in the Lachman test, and acceleration and external rotational angular velocity (ERAV) in the pivot shift were measured as quantitative values. Quantitative values before surgical intervention for ACL-injured knees (ACLD) and uninjured contralateral knees (intact), after temporary fixation of the isolated ACL grafts (ACLR), and subsequently after temporary fixation of both ACL and ALL grafts (ACLR + ALLR) were measured with the patient under general anaesthesia. Results In total, 18 patients were included. The ATT was lower in ACLR and ACLR + ALLR than in intact (P = .008 and .005), while there was no significant difference between ACLR and ACLR + ALLR (P > .05). The acceleration of ACLR + ALLR was lower than that for ACLR (P = .008), while there was no significant difference between intact and ACLR or ACLR + ALLR (P > .05). The ERAV of ACLR was higher than that of intact (P < .001), while that of ACLR + ALLR was lower than that of ACLR (P < 0.001), and there was no significant difference in ERAV between intact and ACLR + ALLR (P > 0.05). Conclusion According to quantitative assessment of the pivot shift, the addition of ALL reconstruction to primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction improved residual knee instability and restored knee stability during surgery. Combination of ALL reconstruction with primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction was effective for patients with ACL injuries exhibiting a preoperative grade 3 subjective pivot shift. Level of evidence IV

Download Full-text

Anterolateral ligament of the knee: back to the future in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Orthopedic Reviews ◽

10.4081/or.2015.5773 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Davide Edoardo Bonasia ◽

Andrea D'Amelio ◽

Pietro Pellegrino ◽

Federica Rosso ◽

Roberto Rossi

Keyword(s):

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Double Bundle ◽

Anterolateral Ligament ◽

Rotational Instability ◽

Small Subset ◽

Acl Injuries ◽

Anterior Cruciate ◽

Double Bundle Acl Reconstruction

Although the importance of the anterolateral stabilizing structures of the knee in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries has been recognized since many years, most of orthopedic surgeons do not take into consideration the anterolateral structures when performing an ACL reconstruction. Anatomic single or double bundle ACL reconstruction will improve knee stability, but a small subset of patients may experience some residual anteroposterior and rotational instability. For this reason, some researchers have turned again towards the anterolateral aspect of the knee and specifically the anterolateral ligament. The goal of this review is to summarize the existing knowledge regarding the anterolateral ligament of the knee, including anatomy, histology, biomechanics and imaging. In addition, the most common anterolateral reconstruction/tenodesis techniques are described together with their respective clinical outcomes.

Download Full-text

The serial changes of static anterior tibial subluxation on MRI after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967120s00490 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽

pp. 2325967120S0049

Author(s):

Hideaki Fukuda ◽

Takahiro Ogura ◽

Kenji Takahashi ◽

Shigehiro Asai

Keyword(s):

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Acl Injury ◽

Double Bundle ◽

Medial Compartment ◽

Injury Group ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Anterior Tibial ◽

Text Figure ◽

Double Bundle Acl Reconstruction

Objectives: Static anterior tibial subluxation after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury highlights the abnormal relationship between the tibia and femur in patients with ACL insufficiency. One of the aims of ACL reconstruction is to restore the normal tibiofemoral relationship. However, several studies indicated that an abnormal tibiofemoral relationship remained after single-bundle (SB) ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine the serial changes of static relationship between tibia and femur in patient who had double-bundle ACL reconstruction with acute and chronic injuries. Methods: Thirty five patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction between January 1 to July 31, 2017 were included in this prospective study and divided two groups: the acute ACL injury group and the chronic ACL injury group (more than 6 month after injury). All participants underwent preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months. Anterior tibial subluxation (ATS) of the medial and lateral compartments relative to the femoral condyles were measured on MRI. Results: There were no significant differences in the age and KT side to side difference between both groups (Table 1). The ATS measurements are shown in table 2. In lateral compartment, the ATS in the acute ACL injury group was 5.3mm before surgery, while it was -0.31mm, 3.4mm, 3.5mm and 4.9mm at 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12months after surgery, respectively. The ATS in the chronic ACL injury group was 6.7mm before surgery, while it was 0.47mm, 3.9mm, 4.6mm and 5.9mm at 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12months after surgery, respectively. No significant difference was found between 2 groups. In medial compartment, the ATS in the acute ACL injury group was 1.8mm before surgery, while it was -1.6mm, 0.28mm, 0.93mm and 2.1mm at 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12months after surgery, respectively. The ATS in the chronic ACL injury group was 2.5mm before surgery, while it was -1.4mm, 1.6mm, 1.7mm and 3.0mm at 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12months after surgery, respectively. No significant difference was found between 2 groups. Conclusion: In both of lateral and medial compartment, the ATS was not significant different between acute and chronic ACL injuries before surgery. In lateral compartment, at 3 weeks, 3months and 6months after surgery, ATS was significantly less than before surgery in both groups. At 12 months, ATS was not significant different from before surgery in both groups. In medial compartment, at 3 weeks, ATS were significantly less than before surgery in both groups. After 3 months, ATS was not significant different from before surgery in both groups. The ATS was not significant different between acute and chronic ACL injuries in the same period after surgery. [Figure: see text][Figure: see text][Figure: see text][Figure: see text]

Download Full-text

Double-Bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Study With 10-Year Results

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546517712231 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 45 (11) ◽

pp. 2578-2585 ◽

Cited By ~ 30

Author(s):

Sally Järvelä ◽

Tommi Kiekara ◽

Piia Suomalainen ◽

Timo Järvelä

Keyword(s):

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Screw Fixation ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Double Bundle ◽

Single Bundle ◽

Significant Group ◽

Kt 1000 ◽

Anterior Cruciate ◽

Double Bundle Acl Reconstruction

Background: A long-term follow-up comparing double-bundle and single-bundle techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has not been reported before. Hypothesis: Double-bundle ACL reconstruction may have fewer graft ruptures, lower rates of osteoarthritis (OA), and better stability than single-bundle reconstruction. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Ninety patients were randomized for double-bundle ACL reconstruction with bioabsorbable screw fixation (DB group; n = 30), single-bundle ACL reconstruction with bioabsorbable screw fixation (SBB group; n = 30), and single-bundle ACL reconstruction with metallic screw fixation (SBM group; n = 30). Evaluation methods consisted of a clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm knee scores, and a radiographic examination of both the operated and contralateral knees. Results: Eighty-one patients (90%) were available at the 10-year follow-up. Eleven patients (1 in the DB group, 7 in the SBB group, and 3 in the SBM group) had a graft failure during the follow-up and went on to undergo revision ACL surgery ( P = .043). In the remaining 70 patients at 10 years, no significant group differences were found in the pivot-shift test findings, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, or knee scores. The most OA findings were found in the medial compartment of the knee, with 38% of the patients in the operated knee and 28% of the patients in the contralateral nonoperated knee. However, no significant group difference was found. The most severe OA changes were in the patients who had the longest delay from the primary injury to ACL reconstruction ( P = .047) and in the patients who underwent partial meniscal resection at the time of ACL reconstruction ( P = .024). Conclusion: Double-bundle ACL reconstruction resulted in significantly fewer graft failures than single-bundle ACL reconstruction during the follow-up. Knee stability and OA rates were similar at 10 years. The most severe OA changes were found in the patients who had the longest delay from the primary injury to ACL reconstruction and in the patients who underwent partial meniscal resection at the time of ACL reconstruction.

Download Full-text

Effects of Remnant Tissue Preservation on Tunnel Enlargement After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Hamstring Tendon

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967118811293 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 6 (12) ◽

pp. 232596711881129 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Tetsuro Masuda ◽

Eiji Kondo ◽

Jun Onodera ◽

Nobuto Kitamura ◽

Masayuki Inoue ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Double Bundle ◽

Tissue Preservation ◽

Tunnel Enlargement ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Anterior Cruciate ◽

Double Bundle Acl Reconstruction ◽

Tunnel Positions

Background: The effects of remnant tissue preservation on tunnel enlargement after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have not yet been established. Hypothesis: The preservation of ACL remnant tissue may significantly reduce the degree and incidence of tunnel enlargement after anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction, while the remnant-preserving procedure may not significantly increase the incidence of tunnel coalition after surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 79 patients underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Based on the Crain classification of ACL remnant tissue, 40 patients underwent the remnant-preserving procedure (group P), and the remaining 39 patients underwent the remnant-resecting procedure (group R). There were no differences between the 2 groups concerning all background factors, including preoperative knee instability and intraoperative tunnel positions. All patients were examined using computed tomography and a standard physical examination at 2 weeks and 1 year after surgery. Results: During surgery, the femoral and tibial anteromedial (AM) tunnel sizes in both groups averaged 6.6 and 6.5 mm, respectively. The femoral and tibial posterolateral (PL) tunnel sizes in both groups averaged 6 and 6 mm, respectively. There were no differences in the intraoperative tunnel positions and tunnel sizes between groups. Concerning the femoral AM tunnel, the degree of tunnel enlargement in the oblique coronal and oblique axial views in group P was significantly less than that in group R ( P = .0068 and .0323, respectively). Regarding the femoral AM tunnel cross-sectional area, the degree and incidence of tunnel enlargement in group P were significantly less than those in group R ( P = .0086 and .0278, respectively). There were no significant differences in tunnel coalition between groups. In each group, there were no significant relationships between tunnel enlargement and each clinical outcome. Conclusion: Remnant preservation in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction reduced enlargement of the femoral AM tunnel and did not increase the incidence of tunnel coalition. This is one of the advantages of remnant-preserving ACL reconstruction.

Download Full-text

Review Article: Anatomic Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery ◽

10.1177/230949900701500219 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 15 (2) ◽

pp. 216-221 ◽

Cited By ~ 34

Author(s):

W Shen ◽

S Jordan ◽

F Fu

Keyword(s):

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Clinical Investigation ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Double Bundle ◽

Rotational Stability ◽

Single Bundle ◽

Osteoarthritic Change ◽

Anterior Cruciate ◽

Double Bundle Acl Reconstruction

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) consists of 2 bundles: a slightly larger anteromedial bundle and a posterolateral bundle, named according to their relative tibial insertion sites. Both bundles are crucial to knee stability. Although it is more technically demanding, a double bundle ACL reconstruction restores the knee biomechanics better and provides more rotational stability than a single bundle ACL reconstruction. Intermediate and long-term clinical investigation including the measurement of rotational laxity and the evaluation of osteoarthritic change is needed to confirm biomechanical and short-term clinical outcomes.

Download Full-text

Accessory Anteromedial Portal may not Provide Clinically Superior Results Compared with the Anteromedial Portal in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The Journal of Knee Surgery ◽

10.1055/s-0037-1607074 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 31 (08) ◽

pp. 716-722

Author(s):

Shu-Ming Ye ◽

Jue-Hua Jing ◽

Hao Lv ◽

Ji-Sen Zhang ◽

Xin-Zhong Xu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Femoral Tunnel ◽

Pivot Shift ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Tibial Tunnel ◽

Pivot Shift Test ◽

Single Bundle ◽

Anteromedial Portal ◽

Anterior Cruciate

AbstractTechniques using the anteromedial portal (AMP) and accessory anteromedial portal (AAMP) are commonly used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The aim of this study was to investigate the radiological and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction using the AMP or AAMP technique to drill the femoral tunnel. The records of 157 patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction using the AMP or AAMP technique between 2011 and 2015 were reviewed. The femoral tunnel clock-face position and femoral tunnel and tibial tunnel anterior–posterior (AP) inclination angles were assessed on axial or AP magnetic resonance images. At last follow-up, the Lachman test and pivot-shift test were used to evaluate AP and rotational stability, respectively. The Lysholm knee scoring scale and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form were used to evaluate clinical and functional results. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in patient age, sex, follow-up period, or affected side distribution. The mean femoral tunnel inclination angle was 31.13 ± 8.06 degrees in the AMP group and 30.17 ± 9.02 degrees in the AAMP group (p = 0.513). The tibial tunnel inclination angle in the AMP group (16.28 ± 7.89 degrees) was not different from that in the AAMP group (13.70 ± 6.08 degrees). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Lysholm knee scoring scale, or IKDC scores. The AAMP technique was not clinically superior to the AMP technique in ACL reconstruction. This is a retrospective comparative study and its level of evidence is III.

Download Full-text

Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligaments With Allograft: Single-tunnel Double-bundle Versus Single-tunnel Single-bundle

10.21203/rs.3.rs-44919/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Weimin Zhu ◽

Yuanhui Zhou ◽

Kang Chen ◽

Yizi Zheng ◽

Wei Lu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Knee Joint ◽

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Pivot Shift ◽

Double Bundle ◽

Pivot Shift Test ◽

Single Bundle ◽

Arthroscopic Reconstruction ◽

Anterior Cruciate ◽

The Stability

Abstract Purpose Arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) commonly adopted single-tunnel single-bundle (STSB) or double-tunnel double-bundle (DTDB) methods. Though single-tunnel double-bundle (STDB) has been used in clinical practice, the efficacy remains unclear. The objective of this study is to compare the clinical results of ACL reconstruction using the STDB and STSB techniques. Methods Between March 2010 to June 2013, 78 patients with ACL rupture underwent arthroscopic STDB reconstruction (42 cases) or STSB reconstruction (36 cases) using anterior tibialis tendon allografts in our department. IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner scores were used to evaluate the subjective function of the knee joint during the postoperative follow-up. In addition, the Lachman test and pivot shift test were used to objectively assess the stability of the knee. Results The average follow-up time is 24.2 ± 5.7 months in the STDB group, and 24.8 ± 6.6 months in the STSB group. Patients in both groups recovered to preoperative sports level with few complications. The postoperative Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner scores, and knee joint stability were significantly improved compared to preoperative status in both groups (P < 0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups at the final follow-up (P > 0.05), except for the improvement of pivot shift test positive rate in the STDB group compared with STSB group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Both techniques can be used to restore the stability and function of the knee joint with satisfactory short-term efficacy, and STDB showed better rotational stability than STSB technique, indicating the STDB technique may also considered a reliable method for ACL reconstruction.

Download Full-text