Association Between Psychological Readiness and Knee Laxity and Their Predictive Value for Return to Sport in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110218
Author(s):  
Anne Gro Heyn Faleide ◽  
Liv Heide Magnussen ◽  
Bård Erik Bogen ◽  
Torbjørn Strand ◽  
Ingunn Fleten Mo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Deciding when patients are ready to return to sport (RTS) after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is challenging. The understanding of which factors affect readiness and how they may be related is limited. Therefore, despite widespread use of RTS testing, there is a lack of knowledge about which tests are informative on the ability to resume sports. Purpose: To examine whether there is an association between knee laxity and psychological readiness to RTS after ACLR and to evaluate the predictive value of these measures on sports resumption. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients aged ≥16 years engaged in physical activity/sports before injury were recruited at routine clinical assessment 9-12 months after ACLR. Exclusion criteria were concomitant ligament surgery at ACLR and/or previous ACL injury in the contralateral knee. At baseline, a project-specific activity questionnaire and the ACL–Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale were completed. Knee laxity was assessed by use of the Lachman test, KT-1000 arthrometer, and pivot-shift test. Two years after surgery, knee reinjuries and RTS status (the project-specific questionnaire) were registered. Associations between psychological readiness and knee laxity were evaluated with the Spearman rho test, and predictive ability of the ACL-RSI and knee laxity tests were examined using regression analyses. Results: Of 171 patients screened for eligibility, 132 were included in the study. There were small but significant associations between the ACL-RSI score and the Lachman test (rho = −0.18; P = .046) and KT-1000 arthrometer measurement (rho = −0.18; P = .040) but no association between the ACL-RSI and the pivot-shift test at the time of recruitment. Of the total patients, 36% returned to preinjury sport level by 2 years after surgery. Higher age, better psychological readiness, and less anterior tibial displacement (KT-1000 arthrometer measurement) were significant predictors of 2-year RTS (explained variance, 33%). Conclusion: Small but significant associations were found between measurements of psychological readiness and anterior tibial displacement, indicating that patients with less knee laxity after ACLR feel more ready to RTS. ACL-RSI and KT-1000 arthrometer measurements were independent predictors of 2-year RTS and should be considered in RTS assessments after ACLR.

Augmentation of Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Does Not Significantly Affect Rotatory Knee Laxity: A Time Zero, In Vivo Kinematic Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (14) ◽  
pp. 3495-3502
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Sheean ◽  
Jayson Lian ◽  
Robert Tisherman ◽  
Sean J. Meredith ◽  
Darren de SA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Lateral Compartment ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Contralateral Knee ◽  
Rotatory Knee Laxity ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: The pivot-shift test is used to assess for rotatory knee laxity in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee and ACL-reconstructed knee; however, the pivot shift uses a subjective grading system that is limited by variability between examiners. Consequently, quantified pivot shift (QPS) test software (PIVOT iPad application) has been developed and validated to measure the magnitude of rotatory knee laxity during the positive pivot-shift test. Purpose: To employ intraoperative QPS (iQPS) to assess for differences in residual rotatory knee laxity after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) versus ACLR augmented with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (ACLR + LET), and to employ iQPS to determine if ACLR and/or ACLR + LET result in overconstrained knee kinematics when compared with the contralateral knee. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: iQPS was performed in 20 patients by a single surgeon on both the operative and contralateral knees before ACLR. ACLR was augmented with a LET if the lateral compartment tibial translation measured during QPS was greater than or equal to double the amount of lateral tibial compartment translation measured for the contralateral knee. After each reconstruction (ACLR or ACLR + LET), iQPS measurements were performed. iQPS data were compared with the preoperative QPS measurements of the operative and contralateral knees. Postoperative iQPS data were compared with both the preoperative QPS measurements of the operative and contralateral knees with paired samples t tests. Categorical variables were compared using the Fisher exact test. Results: The mean age in the cohort was 17.3 years (range, 15-24 years). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the proportion of male patients (ACLR: 5 male, 5 female vs ACLR + LET: 4 male, 6 female) or age (ACLR: 17.7 ± 3.3 years; 95% CI, 15.4-24.0 vs ACLR + LET: 16.8 ± 2.8 years, 95% CI, 14.8-22.0; P = .999). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to preoperative QPS performed during examination under anesthesia (ACLR: 4.7 ± 2.0 mm; 95% CI, 3.3-6.1 vs ACLR + LET: 3.6 ± 1.8 mm; 95% CI, 2.3-4.9; P = .2). Both ACLR and ACLR + LET resulted in significant decreases in rotatory knee laxity when compared with preoperative QPS measurements (ACLR: –3.4 ± 1.7 mm; 95% CI, −4.6 to −2.2; P < .001: ACLR + LET: –2.6 ± 1.9 mm; 95% CI, −3.9 to −1.3; P < .002). Moreover, when compared with isolated ACLR, ACLR + LET did not result in a significantly smaller magnitude of change in iQPS between the pre- and postoperative states ( P = .3). Conclusion: Both ACLR and ACLR + LET resulted in significant decreases in rotatory knee laxity. The augmentation of ACLR with LET did not change the constraint of the knee with respect to lateral compartment translation as measured during iQPS.

Excessive Preoperative Anterior Tibial Subluxation in Extension Is Associated With Inferior Knee Stability After Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 573-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guan-yang Song ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Jin Zhang ◽  
Zhi-jun Zhang ◽  
Tong Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior tibial subluxation (ATS) in extension after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury highlights an increased anterior position of the tibia relative to the femur. Recent studies demonstrated that subluxation is sometimes irreducible and the normal tibiofemoral relationship is not restored by ACL reconstruction (ACLR), which raises concerns regarding clinical outcomes after ACLR. Hypothesis: Excessive preoperative ATS in extension is associated with inferior knee stability after anatomic ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: From March 2016 to January 2017, a total of 487 consecutive patients with clinically diagnosed noncontact ACL injuries who underwent primary anatomic ACLR were retrospectively analyzed. Of these patients, 430 met the criteria for inclusion in this study. Anterior subluxation of the lateral and medial compartments (ASLC and ASMC) in extension relative to the femoral condyles was measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Twenty patients (study group) who demonstrated excessive (>10 mm) ASLC and ASMC in extension were matched 1:2 to 40 participants (control group) who showed minimal or no (<3 mm) ASLC and ASMC in extension. The amount of ASLC and ASMC in extension relative to the femoral condyles at 2 years postoperatively was the primary outcome. Moreover, the Lysholm score, IKDC grade (International Knee Documentation Committee), and stability assessments (pivot-shift test and KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference) were evaluated preoperatively and at the last follow-up visit. Results: The preoperative mean ASLC and ASMC in extension of the study group were both significantly larger than those of the control group (study group vs control group: ASLC, 13.5 mm vs 1.2 mm; ASMC, 12.4 mm vs 1.0 mm; P < .05). Moreover, patients in the study group showed significantly larger posterior tibial slope than the patients in the control group (17.8°± 2.5° vs 9.5°± 1.5°; P < .05). At the final follow-up visit, the mean ASLC and ASMC of the study group were 8.1 mm and 7.3 mm, which were significantly larger than those of the control group (ASLC, 0.9 mm; ASMC, 0.7 mm; P < .05). In addition, the study group showed inferior knee stability when compared with the control group in terms of both the pivot-shift test (study group vs control group: 2 grade 2, 10 grade 1, and 8 grade 0 vs 1 grade 1 and 39 grade 0; P < .05) and the KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference (study group vs control group: 4.4 ± 1.2 mm vs 1.5 ± 0.6 mm; P < .05). Furthermore, the study group showed significantly lower mean Lysholm score (study group vs control group: 80.3 ± 6.3 vs 93.3 ± 4.3, P < .05) and IKDC grading results (study group vs control group: 3 grade C, 16 grade B, and 1 grade A vs 3 grade B and 37 grade A; P < .05) as compared with the control group. Conclusion: In this short-term study, the excessive (>10 mm) preoperative ATS in extension after ACL injury was associated with inferior knee stability after anatomic ACLR.

EVALUATE THE RESULTS OF ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION WITH THE USE OF AUTOGENOUS PATELLAR LIGAMENT AT HUE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

2011 ◽  
pp. 105-115
Author(s):  
Nghi Thanh Nhan Le ◽  
Huu Toan Bui
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Patellar Ligament ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) play the importance role in stability of knee. Our purpose was to report the stability and functional outcomes for a prospective series of patients with ACL injuries treated with reconstruction of use of autogenous patellar ligament. Methods: A prospective study of 30 patients with ACL ruptures treated with arthroscopically assisted reconstruction with autogenous patellar ligament was initiated from May 2008 to December 2010 at Hue University Hospital. Lachman test, anterior draw test, pivot shift test, functional Lysholm scores were obtained at each visit, including preoperatively and at the third and sixth month of follow-up visit. Results: Thirty patients (male : female = 2.3; with a mean age of thirty years) enrolled in the study. Twenty one knees had an isolated ACL tear, nine also had an associated PCL tear and/or meniscus injuries. Lachman test was positive in 100% of cases, draw test was positive in 86% and pivot-shift test was positive in 93%. Mean value of knee function according to Lysholm score was 56 points. Twenty-six patients were followed-up in six months. Lachman test was positive in 15% of all cases, draw test was positive in 7% and pivot-shift test was positive in 7%. Lysholm outcomes scores were improved to 89 points. Conclusions: Bone patellar tendon bone graft was a useful and safety technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

scholarly journals Comparison between functional outcome of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single bundle six fold and four fold semitendinosus and gracilis graft

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 220
Author(s):  
Rahul G. Jaju ◽  
Jeevan B. Tonde
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Anterior Drawer Test ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">With increase participation in sports activities, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a common and functionally disabling injury. Hamstring tendon as autografts for arthroscopic ACL reconstructions have shown good clinical and functional outcome in patients. The purpose of present study was to compare the functional outcome of arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using single bundle six fold and four fold ST and G graft.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">This was a prospective study conducted between period June 2008 to December 2010.181 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction were screened and 113 patients fulfilling the inclusion exclusion criteria were selected for the study</span>.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">All patients completed a minimum of 1 years follow up. In 4 fold group 27.50% were having grade 1 anterior drawer test 22.50% were having grade 1 Lachman test and 17.50% had grade 1 pivot shift test as compared to 6 fold group 6.66% had grade 1 anterior drawer test, 11.66% had grade 1 Lachman test, and 3.33% had grade 1 pivot shift test respectively which was statistically significant (p&lt;0.05). </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using six fold graft is effective modality of treatment in patient with ACL deficient knee. Six fold graft is thicker in diameter and cross sectional area as compared to four fold graft which occupies more surface area of normal ACL foot print and gives better stability of knee joint in both AP and rotational plane.</span></p><p> </p>

scholarly journals A modified anterior drawer test for anterior cruciate ligament ruptures

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang-lei Zhao ◽  
Jin-yang Lyu ◽  
Chang-quan Liu ◽  
Jian-guo Wu ◽  
Jun Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Anterior Drawer ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Anterior Drawer Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Abstract Objective This study was aimed to utilize a modified anterior drawer test (MADT) to detect the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures and investigate its accuracy compares with three traditional tests. Methods Four hundred patients were prospectively enrolled between January 2015 and September 2017 preoperatively to undergo knee arthroscopic surgeries. The MADT, anterior drawer test, Lachman test, and pivot shift test were used in the outpatient clinical setting and were compared statistically for their accuracy in terms of ACL ruptures, with arthroscopic findings as the gold standard. Results The prevalence of ACL ruptures in this study was 37.0%. The MADT demonstrated the highest sensitivity (0.89) and accuracy (0.92) among the four tests and had comparable specificity (0.94) and a positive predictive value (0.90) compared with the anterior drawer test, Lachman test, and pivot shift test. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of MADT was 122.92, with other test values of no more than 55.45. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the MADT was 0.92 ± 0.01, with a significant difference compared with that for the anterior drawer test (z = 17.00, p < 0.001), Lachman test (z = 9.66, p = 0.002), and pivot shift test (z = 16.39, p < 0.001). The interobserver reproducibility of the MADT was good, with a kappa coefficient of 0.86. When diagnosing partial tears of ACL, the MADT was significantly more sensitive than the anterior drawer test (p < 0.001), Lachman test (p = 0.026), and pivot shift test (p = 0.013). The MADT showed similar sensitivity in detecting anteromedial and posterolateral bundle tears (p = 0.113) and no difference in diagnosing acute and chronic ACL ruptures (χ2 = 1.682, p = 0.195). Conclusions The MADT is also an alternative diagnostic test to detect ACL tear, which is equally superior to the anterior drawer test, Lachman test, and pivot shifting test. It could improve the diagnosis of ACL ruptures combined with other clinical information including injury history, clinical examination, and radiological findings. Levels of evidence Level II/observational diagnostic studies Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. ChiCTR1900022945 /retrospectively registered

Arthroscopic Centralization for Lateral Meniscal Injuries Reduces Laxity in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Reconstructed Knee

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110417
Author(s):  
Tomomasa Nakamura ◽  
Brandon D. Marshall ◽  
Taylor M. Price ◽  
Yongtao Mao ◽  
Monica A. Linde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Rotational Stability ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tibial Translation

Background: A lateral meniscal (LM) disorder is one factor that causes rotational laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). There are different types of irreparable meniscal disorders, one of which is a massive meniscal defect. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the kinematic effects of arthroscopic centralization on an irreparable LM defect. The hypothesis was that arthroscopic centralization for an irreparable LM defect with concomitant ACLR would improve knee rotational stability. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 14 fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested in 4 states: (1) intact ACL and intact lateral meniscus, (2) reconstructed ACL and intact lateral meniscus, (3) reconstructed ACL and lateral meniscus defect, and (4) reconstructed ACL and centralized lateral meniscus. Anatomic ACLR was performed using an 8 mm–diameter hamstring tendon graft. An LM defect (20% of the anteroposterior length) was created arthroscopically, and arthroscopic centralization was performed. Kinematics were analyzed using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system under 4 knee loads: (1) an 89.0-N anterior tibial load, (2) a 5.0-N·m external rotation tibial torque, (3) a 5.0-N·m internal rotation tibial torque, and (4) a simulated pivot-shift load with a combined 7.0-N·m valgus and 5.0-N·m internal rotation tibial torque. Results: LM centralization reduced anterior tibial translation similar to that of the ACLR intact LM state under anterior tibial loading (~2 mm at 30° of flexion) and showed 40% to 100% of tibial displacement in the 4 knee states under simulated pivot-shift loading. The procedure overconstrained the knee under internal rotation tibial torque and simulated pivot-shift loading. Conclusion: Arthroscopic centralization reduced knee laxity after ACLR for a massive LM defect in a cadaveric model. Clinical Relevance: In cases involving irreparable LM injuries during ACLR, consideration should be given to arthroscopic centralization for reducing knee laxity. However, the procedure may overconstrain the knee in certain motions.

scholarly journals Surgical Treatment of Segond Fractures in Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596711772999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Ferretti ◽  
Edoardo Monaco ◽  
Megan Rianne Wolf ◽  
Matteo Guzzini ◽  
Angelo De Carli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Segond Fracture ◽  
Acl Tear ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: The Segond fracture is an avulsion-type fracture located on the anterolateral aspect of the tibia associated with a ligament recently termed the anterolateral ligament. This injury has been described as pathognomonic for an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear and is associated with a higher grade pivot shift. Purpose: To present and report 2-year clinical outcomes of a surgical technique for acute ACL reconstruction with fixation of a concomitant Segond fracture. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent acute reconstruction for a complete ACL tear with concomitant Segond fracture fixation between January 2010 and December 2014; surgery was performed by a single surgeon. Patients underwent direct Segond fracture repair by either suture alone, suture anchor, or cannulated screw fixation based on the size of the lesion, followed by a 2-incision hamstring autograft intra-articular reconstruction. Pre- and postoperative KT-1000 arthrometer assessment, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test were performed, and patients were administered validated subjective outcome surveys. Results: Twelve patients met inclusion criteria for this review. The measured pre- and postoperative objective and subjective scores were significantly improved in all patients. Side-to-side anterior laxity was significantly improved in all patients based on Lachman and KT-1000 arthrometer testing. A significant pivot shift demonstrated preoperatively (3+, n = 11 [92%]; 2+, n = 1 [8%]) was corrected after fixation, except in 1 patient (8%), who maintained a 1+ pivot shift. Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective and objective scores were significantly improved. At a minimum 2-year follow-up, no patients reported rerupture, and only 1 patient (8%) underwent a subsequent procedure (a meniscectomy). No major or minor complications were reported, and all patients returned to their previous activity levels at a mean of 6 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Direct repair of the Segond fracture and plication of the anterolateral capsule in patients with an ACL rupture and a high-grade pivot shift demonstrate good clinical outcomes, restoration of rotational stability, and maintenance of knee range of motion at 2 years postoperatively, with no major complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document