scholarly journals Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 2394-2401 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Rick W. Wright ◽  
Laura J. Huston ◽  
Amanda K. Haas ◽  
Christina R. Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
High Baseline ◽  
Revision Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Lateral Meniscectomy ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a valid measure of results after revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Revision ACL reconstruction has been documented to have worse outcomes when compared with primary ACL reconstruction. Understanding positive and negative predictors of PROs will allow surgeons to modify and potentially improve outcome for patients. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to describe PROs after revision ACL reconstruction and test the hypothesis that patient- and technique-specific variables are associated with these outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction were identified and prospectively enrolled by 83 surgeons over 52 sites. Data included baseline demographics, surgical technique and pathology, and a series of validated PRO instruments: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Marx Activity Rating Scale. Patients were followed up at 2 years and asked to complete the identical set of outcome instruments. Multivariate regression models were used to control for a variety of demographic and surgical factors to determine the positive and negative predictors of PRO scores at 2 years after revision surgery. Results: A total of 1205 patients met the inclusion criteria and were successfully enrolled: 697 (58%) were male, with a median cohort age of 26 years. The median time since their most recent previous ACL reconstruction was 3.4 years. Two-year questionnaire follow-up was obtained from 989 patients (82%). The most significant positive predictors of 2-year IKDC scores were a high baseline IKDC score, high baseline Marx activity level, male sex, and having a longer time since the most recent previous ACL reconstruction, while negative predictors included having a lateral meniscectomy before the revision ACL reconstruction or having grade 3/4 chondrosis in either the trochlear groove or the medial tibial plateau at the time of the revision surgery. For KOOS, having a high baseline score and having a longer time between the most recent previous ACL reconstruction and revision surgery were significant positive predictors for having a better (ie, higher) 2-year KOOS, while having a lateral meniscectomy before the revision ACL reconstruction was a consistent predictor for having a significantly worse (ie, lower) 2-year KOOS. Statistically significant positive predictors for 2-year Marx activity levels included higher baseline Marx activity levels, younger age, male sex, and being a nonsmoker. Negative 2-year activity level predictors included having an allograft or a biologic enhancement at the time of revision surgery. Conclusion: PROs after revision ACL reconstruction are associated with a variety of patient- and surgeon-related variables. Understanding positive and negative predictors of PROs will allow surgeons to guide patient expectations as well as potentially improve outcomes.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions With Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Result in Lower Graft Rupture Rates but Similar Patient-Reported Outcomes as Compared With Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Comparison of 875 Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 2195-2204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armin Runer ◽  
Robert Csapo ◽  
Caroline Hepperger ◽  
Mirco Herbort ◽  
Christian Hoser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Quadriceps Tendon ◽  
Hamstring Tendon ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Acl Injuries ◽  
Graft Rupture ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Graft rupture is a devastating outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Little is known about graft rupture rates as well as clinical and functional outcomes after ACLR with quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts. Purpose: To compare QT with hamstring tendon (HT) autografts in terms of the rates of graft and contralateral ACL rupture as well as patient-reported outcome measures. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All primary ACLRs performed between 2010 and 2016 were followed prospectively for 24 months through the recording of graft ruptures and contralateral ACL injuries as well as patient-administered questionnaires. Results: A total of 875 patients were included in the study. Three factors—graft type, age group, and activity level—had a significant value in predicting the need for revision surgery. The odds of revision surgery were 5.5 times greater in children younger than 15 years than in adults older than 45 years, 3.6 times greater in patients with high activity levels than low activity levels, and 2.7 times greater in patients receiving an HT autograft as compared with a QT autograft. A significantly higher rate of ipsilateral graft ruptures versus contralateral ACL injuries was observed in the HT group (4.9% vs 2.3%; odds ratio, 2.1; P = .01) but not in the QT group (2.8% vs 2.3%). The difference in the ratios of graft and contralateral ACL ruptures was even more pronounced in highly active patients treated with HT autografts (11.1% vs 4.2%; odds ratio, 2.6; P = .01) as compared with QT autografts (5.0% vs 2.8%; P = .48). Two-year measures of Lysholm scores (mean ± SD: QT, 86.0 ± 22.3; HT, 89.4 ± 16.4) and Tegner activity scores (QT, 6.1 ± 2.0; HT, 5.7 ± 1.9) as well as visual analog scale pain (QT, 0.8 ± 1.3; HT, 0.7 ± 1.1) did not differ between grafts. Conclusion: Graft choice does not influence clinical and functional outcomes 2 years after ACLR. However, 3 factors—graft type, age group, and activity level—have a significant value in predicting the need for revision surgery. Patients treated with HT autografts have a significantly higher, activity-dependent risk of revision surgery and experience more ipsilateral graft ruptures than subsequent contralateral ACL injuries when compared with patients treated with QT autografts. Young age and high activity level are significant predictors for ACL revision surgery.

scholarly journals Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Predictors of Clinical Outcome After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 1671-1679 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Rick W. Wright ◽  
Laura J. Huston ◽  
Sam K. Nwosu ◽  
Amanda K. Haas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Articular Cartilage ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cartilage Damage ◽  
Functional Limitation ◽  
Sports Participation ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Revision Acl Reconstruction

Background: Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been documented to have worse outcomes compared with primary ACL reconstructions. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine if the prevalence, location, and/or degree of meniscal and chondral damage noted at the time of revision ACL reconstruction predicts activity level, sports function, and osteoarthritis symptoms at 2-year follow-up. The hypothesis was that meniscal loss and high-grade chondral damage noted at the time of revision ACL reconstruction will result in lower activity levels, decreased sports participation, more pain, more stiffness, and more functional limitation at 2 years after revision surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Between 2006 and 2011, a total of 1205 patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction by 83 surgeons at 52 hospitals were accumulated for study of the relationship of meniscal and articular cartilage damage to outcome. Baseline demographic and intraoperative data, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Marx activity score, were collected initially and at 2-year follow-up to test the hypothesis. Regression analysis was used to control for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, activity level, baseline outcome scores, revision number, time since last ACL reconstruction, incidence of having a previous ACL reconstruction on the contralateral knee, previous and current meniscal and articular cartilage injury, graft choice, and surgeon years of experience to assess the meniscal and articular cartilage risk factors for clinical outcomes 2 years after revision ACL reconstruction. Results: At 2-year follow-up, 82% (989/1205) of the patients returned their questionnaires. It was found that previous meniscal injury and current articular cartilage damage were associated with the poorest outcomes, with prior lateral meniscectomy and current grade 3 to 4 trochlear articular cartilage changes having the worst outcome scores. Activity levels at 2 years were not affected by meniscal or articular cartilage pathologic changes. Conclusion: Prior lateral meniscectomy and current grade 3 to 4 changes of the trochlea were associated with worse outcomes in terms of decreased sports participation, more pain, more stiffness, and more functional limitation at 2 years after revision surgery, but they had no effect on activity levels. Registration: NCT00625885

scholarly journals Effect of Graft Choice on the 6 Year Outcome of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0028
Author(s):  
Mars Group ◽  
Rick W. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Graft Choice ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Revision Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Objectives: Most surgeons believe that graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an important factor related to outcome. The purpose of this study was to determine if revision ACL graft choice predicts outcomes related to sports function, activity level, OA symptoms, graft re-rupture, and reoperation at six years following revision reconstruction. We hypothesized that autograft use would result in increased sports function, increased activity level, and decreased OA symptoms (as measured by validated patient reported outcome instruments). Additionally, we hypothesized that autograft use would result in decreased graft failure and reoperation rate 6 years following revision ACL reconstruction. Methods: Revision ACL reconstruction patients were identified and prospectively enrolled by 83 surgeons over 52 sites. Data collected included baseline demographics, surgical technique and pathology, and a series of validated patient reported outcome instruments (IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC, and Marx activity rating score). Patients were followed up for 6 years, and asked to complete the identical set of outcome instruments. Incidence of additional surgery and re-operation due to graft failure were also recorded. Multivariate regression models were used to determine the predictors (risk factors) of IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC, Marx scores, graft re-rupture, and re-operation rate at 6 years following revision surgery. Results: 1234 patients were successfully enrolled with 716 (58%) males. Median age was 26. In 87% this was their first revision. 367 (30%) were undergoing revision by the surgeon that had performed the previous reconstruction. 598 (48%) underwent revision reconstruction utilizing an autograft, 599 (49%) allograft, and 37 (3%) both autograft and allograft. Median time since their last ACL reconstruction was 3.4 years. Questionnaire follow-up was obtained on 810 subjects (65%), while phone follow-up was obtained on 949 subjects (76%). The IKDC, KOOS, and WOMAC scores (with the exception of the WOMAC stiffness subscale) all significantly improved at the 6-year follow-up time point (p<0.001). Contrary to the IKDC, KOOS, and WOMAC scores, the 6-year MARX activity scale demonstrated a significant decrease from the initial score at enrollment (p<0.001). Graft choice proved to be a significant predictor of 6-year Marx activity level scores (p=0.005). Specifically, the use of an autograft for revision reconstruction predicted improved activity levels [Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.54; 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 1.14, 2.04]. Graft choice proved to be a significant predictor of 6-year IKDC scores (p=0.018), in that soft tissue grafts predicted higher 6-year IKDC scores [OR = 1.62; 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 1.09, 2.414]. For the KOOS subscales, graft choice did not predict outcome score. Graft re-rupture was reported in 55/949 (5.8%) of patients by their 6-year follow-up: 37 allografts, 16 autografts, and 2 allograft + autograft. Use of an autograft for revision resulted in patients 6.04 times less likely to sustain a subsequent graft rupture than if an allograft was utilized (p=0.009; 95% CI=1.57, 23.2). Conclusion: Improved sports function and patient reported outcome measures are obtained when an autograft is utilized. Additionally, autograft type shows a decreased risk in graft re-rupture at six years follow-up. Surgeon education regarding the findings in this study can result in potentially improved revision ACLR results for our patients.

scholarly journals Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 2056-2066
Author(s):  
◽  
John P. Bigouette ◽  
Erin C. Owen ◽  
Brett (Brick) A. Lantz ◽  
Rudolf G. Hoellrich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Sports Participation ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Acl Revision ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision cohorts continually report lower outcome scores on validated knee questionnaires than primary ACL cohorts at similar time points after surgery. It is unclear how these outcomes are associated with physical activity after physician clearance for return to recreational or competitive sports after ACL revision surgery. Hypotheses: Participants who return to either multiple sports or a singular sport after revision ACL surgery will report decreased knee symptoms, increased activity level, and improved knee function as measured by validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and compared with no sports participation. Multisport participation as compared with singular sport participation will result in similar increased PROMs and activity level. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 1205 patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction were enrolled by 83 surgeons at 52 clinical sites. At the time of revision, baseline data collected included the following: demographics, surgical characteristics, previous knee treatment and PROMs, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, Marx activity score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). A series of multivariate regression models were used to evaluate the association of IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC, and Marx Activity Rating Scale scores at 2 years after revision surgery by sports participation category, controlling for known significant covariates. Results: Two-year follow-up was obtained on 82% (986 of 1205) of the original cohort. Patients who reported not participating in sports after revision surgery had lower median PROMs both at baseline and at 2 years as compared with patients who participated in either a single sport or multiple sports. Significant differences were found in the change of scores among groups on the IKDC ( P < .0001), KOOS-Symptoms ( P = .01), KOOS–Sports and Recreation ( P = .04), and KOOS–Quality of Life ( P < .0001). Patients with no sports participation were 2.0 to 5.7 times more likely than multiple-sport participants to report significantly lower PROMs, depending on the specific outcome measure assessed, and 1.8 to 3.8 times more likely than single-sport participants (except for WOMAC-Stiffness, P = .18), after controlling for known covariates. Conclusion: Participation in either a single sport or multiple sports in the 2 years after ACL revision surgery was found to be significantly associated with higher PROMs across multiple validated self-reported assessment tools. During follow-up appointments, surgeons should continue to expect that patients who report returning to physical activity after surgery will self-report better functional outcomes, regardless of baseline activity levels.

scholarly journals Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Predictors of Outcome following Revision ACL Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0036
Author(s):  
Rick Wright ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Articular Cartilage ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Medial Meniscus ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Revision Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Acl Surgery

Objectives: Previous work has shown that having a lateral meniscectomy prior to revision ACL surgery, as well as grade 3-4 chondral damage to the trochlea at the time of revision ACL surgery results in poorer outcomes at 2 years. Alternatively, meniscal or articular cartilage (AC) pathology documented at the time of a revision surgery were not found to be significant risk factors for 2-year activity levels. The purpose of this study was to follow this cohort for a longer time period, to determine if either meniscal and/or articular cartilage pathology noted at the time of revision ACL surgery significantly affects a patient’s activity level, sports function, and OA symptoms at 6-year follow-up. Methods: Revision ACL reconstruction patients were identified and prospectively enrolled between 2006 and 2011. Data collected included baseline demographics, surgical technique and pathology, and a series of validated patient reported outcome instruments (IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC, and Marx activity rating score). Patients were followed up for 6 years and asked to complete the identical set of outcome instruments. Regression analysis was used to control for age, gender, BMI, smoking status, activity level, baseline outcome scores, revision number, time since their last ACL reconstruction, graft choice, and previous and current meniscal and articular cartilage pathology, in order to assess the meniscal and AC pathology risk factors for clinical outcomes 6 years after revision ACL reconstruction. Results: 1234 patients met the inclusion criteria and were successfully enrolled, with 716 (58%) males and a median cohort age of 26 years. The median time since their last ACL reconstruction was 3.4 years. Surgeons noted previous pathology in the medial meniscus (39%), lateral meniscus (20%), and articular surfaces (12%) at the time of revision surgery. Surgeons reported current pathology at the time of revision surgery in the medial meniscus (45%), lateral meniscus (36%), medial femoral condyle (MFC; 43%), lateral femoral condyle (LFC; 29%), medial tibial plateau (MTP; 11%), lateral tibial plateau (LTP; 17%), patella (30%), and trochlea (21%). At 6 years, follow-up was obtained on 77% (949/1234). Previous and current meniscal pathology (both medial and lateral), as well as current AC pathology (in the MFC, LTP, trochlea, and patella) were found to be significant drivers of poorer outcomes at 6 years. The most consistent cartilage-related factors driving outcome in revision patients were either a previous or current repair or excision of the medial meniscus and patellofemoral AC pathology. Six-year Marx activity levels were negatively impacted by having either a repair or an excision of the medial meniscus (odds ratio range =0.58-66; 95% CI=0.38-0.91; p=0.01) or having grade 3-4 patellar chondrosis (OR=0.57; 95% CI= 0.35-0.95; p=0.03). Conversely, 6-year activity levels significantly improved by having either a lateral meniscus repair or excision (OR=1.49-2.22; 95% CI=1.07-4.04; p=0.005). Previous medial or lateral meniscal pathology negatively affected all KOOS subscales except for sports/recreation (p<0.05). Articular pathology significantly impaired KOOS symptoms, sports/recreation and the quality of life subscales (p<0.05). The KOOS sports/recreation subscale was significantly affected by articular cartilage pathology (LTP, patella, trochlea; p<0.03). Lower baseline outcome scores, lower baseline activity level, and being a smoker all significantly increased the odds of reporting poorer clinical outcomes at 6 years. Conclusion: Meniscal and articular cartilage pathology was found to have a larger impact at 6 years following revision ACL surgery, as compared to 2-year follow-up. In contrast to 2-year follow-up, incidence of medial meniscal and AC pathology at the time of a patient’s revision surgery were found to significantly diminish a patient’s activity level at 6 years, whereas the incidence of lateral meniscal repair or excision was found to improve a patient’s activity level. Having a previous medial meniscal repair or excision or exhibiting grade 2-4 chondral damage noted at the time of ACL revision reconstruction results in poorer IKDC and KOOS scores and worse WOMAC pain and ADL scores at 6 years following revision surgery.

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes at a Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (03) ◽  
pp. 218-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea Johnson ◽  
Robert Brophy ◽  
Ljiljana Bogunovic ◽  
Matthew Matava ◽  
Matthew Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Revision Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

AbstractRevision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction typically has worse outcomes than primary reconstructions. Minimal long-term data exist regarding 5-year results. We chose to perform a systematic review to evaluate midterm (5-year) revision ACL reconstruction outcomes (patient-reported outcomes, reoperation, stability, arthritis) in comparison to primary ACL reconstructions at similar time points. Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were queried, and four studies met the inclusion criteria. Two authors reviewed and performed data extraction. All were level 4 studies. Review of the studies demonstrated that results at 5 years are consistently worse than those noted in primary reconstructions for objective and patient-reported outcomes. Revision ACL reconstruction outcomes remain worse than primary reconstructions at midterm 5-year follow-up. The level of evidence is 4.

scholarly journals Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 2586-2594 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Christina R. Allen ◽  
Allen F. Anderson ◽  
Daniel E. Cooper ◽  
Thomas M. DeBerardino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Femoral Fixation ◽  
Revision Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been documented to have worse outcomes compared with primary ACL reconstruction. Hypothesis: Certain factors under the control of the surgeon at the time of revision surgery can both negatively and positively affect outcomes. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction were identified and prospectively enrolled between 2006 and 2011. Data collected included baseline demographics, intraoperative surgical technique and joint disorders, and a series of validated patient-reported outcome instruments (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] subjective form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], and Marx activity rating scale) completed before surgery. Patients were followed up for 2 years and asked to complete an identical set of outcome instruments. Regression analysis was used to control for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), activity level, baseline outcome scores, revision number, time since last ACL reconstruction, and a variety of previous and current surgical variables to assess the surgical risk factors for clinical outcomes 2 years after revision ACL reconstruction. Results: A total of 1205 patients (697 male [58%]) met the inclusion criteria and were successfully enrolled. The median age was 26 years, and the median time since their last ACL reconstruction was 3.4 years. Two-year follow-up was obtained on 82% (989/1205). Both previous and current surgical factors were found to be significant contributors toward poorer clinical outcomes at 2 years. Having undergone previous arthrotomy (nonarthroscopic open approach) for ACL reconstruction compared with the 1-incision technique resulted in significantly poorer outcomes for the 2-year IKDC ( P = .037; odds ratio [OR], 2.43; 95% CI, 1.05-5.88) and KOOS pain, sports/recreation, and quality of life (QOL) subscales ( P ≤ .05; OR range, 2.38-4.35; 95% CI, 1.03-10.00). The use of a metal interference screw for current femoral fixation resulted in significantly better outcomes for the 2-year KOOS symptoms, pain, and QOL subscales ( P ≤ .05; OR range, 1.70-1.96; 95% CI, 1.00-3.33) as well as WOMAC stiffness subscale ( P = .041; OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.02-3.03). Not performing notchplasty at revision significantly improved 2-year outcomes for the IKDC ( P = .013; OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.08-1.99), KOOS activities of daily living (ADL) and QOL subscales ( P ≤ .04; OR range, 1.40-1.41; 95% CI, 1.03-1.93), and WOMAC stiffness and ADL subscales ( P ≤ .04; OR range, 1.41-1.49; 95% CI, 1.03-2.05). Factors before revision ACL reconstruction that increased the risk of poorer clinical outcomes at 2 years included lower baseline outcome scores, a lower Marx activity score at the time of revision, a higher BMI, female sex, and a shorter time since the patient’s last ACL reconstruction. Prior femoral fixation, prior femoral tunnel aperture position, and knee flexion angle at the time of revision graft fixation were not found to affect 2-year outcomes in this revision cohort. Conclusion: There are certain surgical variables that the physician can control at the time of revision ACL reconstruction that can modify clinical outcomes at 2 years. Whenever possible, opting for an anteromedial portal or transtibial surgical exposure, choosing a metal interference screw for femoral fixation, and not performing notchplasty are associated with significantly better 2-year clinical outcomes.

Strategies for revision surgery after primary double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2072-2080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Hofbauer ◽  
Bart Muller ◽  
Christopher D. Murawski ◽  
Michael Baraga ◽  
Carola Franziska van Eck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Double Bundle ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Twenty-Year Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Prospectively Collected Data

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110273
Author(s):  
Joshua S. Everhart ◽  
Sercan Yalcin ◽  
Kurt P. Spindler
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Function ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Several long-term (≥20 years) follow-up studies after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been published in recent years, allowing for a systematic evaluation of outcomes. Purpose: To summarize outcomes at ≥20 years after ACL reconstruction and identify patient and surgical factors that affect these results. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Prospective studies of primary ACL reconstructions with hamstring or bone–patellar tendon—bone (BTB) autograft via an arthroscopic or a mini-open technique and with a mean follow-up of ≥20 years were identified. When possible, the mean scores for each outcome measure were calculated. Factors identified in individual studies as predictive of outcomes were described. Results: Five studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria with a total of 2012 patients. The pooled mean follow-up for patient-reported outcome measures was 44.2% (range, 29.6%-92.7%) and in-person evaluation was 33.2% (range, 29.6%-48.9%). Four studies (n = 584) reported graft tears at a mean rate of 11.8% (range, 2%-18.5%) and 4 studies (n = 773) reported a contralateral ACL injury rate of 12.2% (range, 5.8%-30%). Repeat non-ACL arthroscopic surgery (4 studies; n = 177) to the ipsilateral knee occurred in 10.4% (range, 9.5%-18.3%) and knee arthroplasty (1 study; n = 217) in 5%. The pooled mean of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee function (IKDC) score was 79.1 (SD, 21.8 [3 studies; n = 644]). In 2 studies (n?= 221), 57.5% of patients continued to participate in strenuous activities. The IKDC-objective score was normal or nearly normal in 82.3% (n = 496; 3 studies), with low rates of clinically significant residual laxity. Moderate-severe radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) (IKDC grade C or D) was present in 25.9% of patients (n = 605; 3 studies). Medial meniscectomy is associated with increased risk of radiographic OA. Radiographic OA severity is associated with worse patient-reported knee function, but the association with knee pain is unclear. Conclusion: Currently available prospective evidence for ACL reconstruction with hamstring or BTB autograft provides several insights into outcomes at 20 years. The rates of follow-up at 20 years range from 30% to 93%. IKDC-objective scores were normal or nearly normal in 82% and the mean IKDC-subjective score was 79 points.

Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 2501-2509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avinesh Agarwalla ◽  
Richard N. Puzzitiello ◽  
Joseph N. Liu ◽  
Gregory L. Cvetanovich ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are one of the most common traumatic knee injuries experienced by athletes. Return to sport is considered the pinnacle endpoint among patients receiving ACL reconstruction. However, at the time of return to sport, patients may not be participating at their previous levels of function, as defined by clinical metrics. Purpose: To establish when patients perceive maximal subjective medical improvement according to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed database was conducted to identify studies that reported sequential PROMs up to a minimum of 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Pooled analysis was conducted for PROMs at follow-up points of 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Clinically significant improvement was determined between pairs of intervals with the minimal clinically important difference. Results: This review contains 30 studies including 2253 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. Clinically significant improvement in the KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was seen up to 1 year after ACL reconstruction, but no clinical significance was noted from 1 to 2 years. Clinically significant improvement in the IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) and Lysholm questionnaires was seen up to 6 months postoperatively, but no clinical significance was noted beyond that. Conclusion: After ACL reconstruction, maximal subjective medical improvement is established 1 year postoperatively, with no further perceived clinical improvement beyond this time point according to current PROMs. The KOOS may be a more responsive metric to subjective improvements in this patient cohort than other patient-reported outcomes, such as the IKDC and Lysholm. Clinical Relevance: After ACL reconstruction, patients perceive interval subjective improvements until 1 year postoperatively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document