ACL Reconstruction Combined With the Arnold-Coker Modification of the MacIntosh Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: Long-term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes

Background: Interest in the role of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in preventing rotatory instability and the pivot-shift phenomenon after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been recently renewed. Nevertheless, there is still concern about overconstraint of the lateral compartment of the knee and the risk of subsequent osteoarthritis (OA). Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare long-term subjective and objective outcomes and the rate of OA development between patients undergoing isolated ACLR (iACLR) with a hamstring tendon autograft and those with a combined Arnold-Coker modification of the McIntosh extra-articular procedure. Risk factors for long-term OA were evaluated. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The study included 165 consecutive patients treated at a single center by ACLR. A total of 86 patients underwent iACLR (iACLR group) and 79 received combined intra- and extra-articular reconstruction (ACLR+LET). The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores were administered. Knee stability was tested through the Lachman test, the pivot-shift test, and the KT-1000 knee arthrometer test. A positive pivot-shift test (++/+++), laxity on the KT-1000, and referred giving-way episodes or revision ACLR were considered failures. Radiographic results were assessed according to the Fairbank, IKDC, and Kellgren-Lawrence scales. Radiographic evaluation included both the overall tibiofemoral joint and the medial and lateral compartment separately. A univariate and a multivariate logistic regression with penalized maximum likelihood was used to identify risks factors associated with long-term OA. Results: The mean follow-up was 15.7 years. There were no statistically significant differences in subjective scores between the 2 groups. A side-to-side difference >5 mm on the KT-1000 arthrometer evaluation was found in 8 patients in the iACLR group and in 1 patient in the ACLR+LET group ( P = .01). Nine cases of failure were found in the iACLR group and only 1 case was found in the ACLR+LET group ( P = .0093). Patients in the iACLR group had a significantly higher OA grades than those in the ACLR+LET group for the overall tibiofemoral joint and the lateral compartment of the knee. No differences were found in the medial compartment. A higher level of lateral compartment OA was found in patients who received partial lateral meniscectomy in the iACLR group compared with those in the ACLR+LET group. Univariate and multivariate analysis results demonstrated that meniscectomy was the most significant factor for long-term OA development. Conclusion: A significantly higher risk of long-term OA was found with iACLR than with ACLR combined with the Arnold-Coker modification of the McIntosh extra-articular procedure. Knees with combined ACLR also had a significantly lower OA grade after partial lateral meniscectomy. Additionally, those undergoing combined ACLR had better knee stability and lower graft rupture rates at the long-term follow-up. Partial meniscectomy was the main risk factor negatively associated with OA changes.

Aseptic Revision and Reoperation Risks After Meniscectomy at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: An intact meniscus is considered a secondary stabilizer of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). While loss of the meniscus can increase forces on the anterior cruciate ligament graft after reconstruction, it is unclear whether this increased loading affects the success of the graft after ACLR. Purpose: To identify the risk of subsequent knee surgery when meniscectomy, either partial or total, is performed at the time of index ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We conducted a matched cohort study using data from the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Registry. Patients were identified who had a primary ACLR performed between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2016, with up to 12 years of follow-up. The study sample comprised patients with ACLR who had a lateral meniscectomy (n = 2581), medial meniscectomy (n = 1802), or lateral and medial meniscectomies (n = 666). For each meniscectomy subgroup, patients with ACLR alone were matched to patients with a meniscectomy on a number of patient and procedure characteristics. After the application of matching, Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the risk of aseptic revision, while competing risks regression was used to evaluate the risk of cause-specific ipsilateral reoperation between meniscectomy and ACLR alone. Analysis was performed for each meniscectomy subgroup. Results: After the application of matching, we failed to observe a difference in aseptic revision risk for patients with ACLR and a meniscectomy—lateral (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63-1.02), medial (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.70-1.29), or both (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.77-2.04)—as compared with ACLR alone. When compared with patients who had ACLR alone, patients with a lateral meniscectomy had a higher risk for subsequent lateral meniscectomy (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.18-3.02; P = .008), and those with a medial meniscectomy had a lower risk for manipulation under anesthesia (HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.92; P = .041). Conclusion: No difference in aseptic revision risk was observed for patients undergoing primary ACLR between groups with and without meniscectomy at the time of index surgery. Partial lateral meniscectomy at the time of index ACLR did associate with a higher risk of subsequent lateral meniscectomy.

Risk Factors for Rapid Chondrolysis After Partial Lateral Meniscectomy: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Background: The occurrence of rapid chondrolysis after partial lateral meniscectomy is rare. The pathophysiology, risk factors, and outcomes of treatment have not been established. Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to perform a scoping review of the literature to determine the potential risk factors and pathogenesis of rapid chondrolysis. The secondary objective was to report outcomes of treatment. Study Design: Systematic (scoping) review. Methods: A scoping review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the framework of Arksey and O’Malley. A search strategy based on the terms “chondrolysis” AND “knee,” “chondrolysis” AND “meniscus,” and “chondral damage” AND “lateral meniscus” was applied to the PubMed database on March 31, 2020. All relevant studies were included. Patient demographics and clinical data were extracted from these studies and analyzed in order to investigate the potential risk factors, pathogenesis, and outcomes of treatment for rapid chondrolysis. Results: Five articles (22 cases) featuring rapid chondrolysis in the lateral compartment after partial lateral meniscectomy were identified and included. The condition occurred most frequently in patients who were young (mean age, 25.6 years), male (20/22 cases; 91%), and participating in high-intensity sports (19/22 cases; 86.4%) within 1 year of the index procedure. Half of the included study population underwent surgery for a radial tear. All professional athletes (13/13) returned to the preinjury level of sport. All authors of included studies suggested that the main causal risk factor was mechanical focal cartilage overload in the lateral compartment of the knee. Conclusion: Rapid chondrolysis after partial lateral meniscectomy is a rare condition that typically occurs within 12 months of the index procedure. Younger age, male sex, high-intensity sports participation, and some meniscal tear patterns (eg, radial tear) are potentially important risk factors. Return-to-sport rates at short-term follow up are high, but no long-term studies were identified. The pathogenesis of rapid chondrolysis seems to relate to mechanical focal cartilage overload.

Spontaneous atraumatic knee haemarthrosis

Spontaneous knee haemarthrosis is a rare condition, most prevalent in the elderly with osteoarthritis. Recent reports have proposed that the source of bleeding is the peripheral arteries supplying the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. In this case, a 62-year-old active man presented with acute postero-lateral left knee pain and swelling with limited weight bearing or movement of the knee. No recent history of trauma but history of lateral compartment dominant osteoarthritis and arthroscopic partial lateral meniscectomy of left knee. Aspiration showed a large haemarthrosis and following an MRI scan displaying large areas of full thickness chondral loss, complex tearing of lateral meniscus and loose bodies, the patient had an arthroscopy, washout, debridement of osteochondral tibial defect and diathermy of suspected bleeding point. This report supports the peripheral arteries supplying the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus as the source of bleeding in spontaneous haemarthrosis of the knee.

Development of OA Following ACL Reconstruction: Unexpected Finding in Medial Versus Lateral Meniscus Pathology

Objectives: Recent studies have described increased risk of OA following ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Systematic reviews have suggested that meniscal pathology, which occurs in up to 60% of patients with ACL injury, increases this risk. The literature reports a 50% incidence of OA following medial meniscectomy, two times the risk compared to lateral meniscectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of meniscal pathology on the incidence of OA following ACLR. Methods: All patients who underwent primary autograft or allograft BPTB transtibial ACLR by a single surgeon between 1999-2015 were identified. Revision ACLR, multi-ligamentous reconstructions, and patients with less than 2-year imaging follow-up were excluded. Meniscus pathology and treatment were recorded. OA was defined at follow-up as Kellgren-Lawrence grade III-IV on plain radiographs. Chi-square tests assessed differences in incidence rates (p<0.05). Results: A consecutive series of 103 patients (56 males, 47 females; age 36.1±11.4 years) with BPTB ACLR with an average follow-up of 8.81±4.96 (range 2-20 years) were included. The prevalence of medial meniscus tears at the time of ACL injury was 47.6% (49/103) and prevalence of lateral meniscus tears was 56.3% (58/103) (p=0.166). Medial compartment OA was seen in 9.7% (10/103) of patients. Prevalence of medial compartment OA was greater in patients with medial meniscus tear (14.3%; 7/49) compared to those without a medial meniscus tear (5.6%; 3/54); however, this was not significant (p=0.135). Of the 7 patients with medial meniscal tear and medial compartment OA, 5 underwent partial medial meniscectomy and 2 underwent repair. Lateral compartment OA was seen in 14.6% (15/103). The prevalence of lateral compartment OA was greater in patients with a lateral meniscus tear (22.4%; 13/58) compared to patients without lateral meniscus tears (4.4%; 2/45) (p=0.01). Patients with lateral meniscus tear were 5.04 [95%CI: 1.2 to 21.2] times more likely to develop OA. Thirteen of the 47 (28%) patients that underwent partial lateral meniscectomy developed lateral OA compared to 0% of patients (0/10) that underwent lateral meniscal repair (p=0.068). Conclusion: While studies with multiple surgeons and rehabilitation protocols have shown the development of OA following ACLR is increased with medial meniscal pathology, we found that the prevalence of medial OA was not significantly higher in these patients with medial meniscal tear at an average of 8.81 years follow-up. Whereas, lateral meniscal repair dramatically reduced the development of knee OA compared to partial meniscectomy in this cohort of patients with ACLR. These findings can inform clinical practice as despite prior literature indicating a relationship between medial meniscal tear and osteoarthritis, we did not see a greater prevalence of OA amongst patients undergoing ACLR with a medial meniscal tear. Further, a lateral meniscal repair offers superior protection against OA when compared to partial lateral meniscectomy in treating lateral meniscal tears and is essential in the treatment of these complex patients.

Role of pre-operative PROMIS scores in predicting post-operative outcomes and likelihood of achieving MCID following arthroscopic meniscus surgery

Objectives: The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement and Information System computer-adaptive test (PROMIS-CAT) forms in patients undergoing meniscus surgery remains unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine changes of PROMIS t-scores in meniscus surgery patients, as well as to determine the MCID in PROMIS scores for these patients. Secondarily, we sought to determine factors that predicted achievement of this MCID. Methods: Patients undergoing meniscal surgery (medial and/or lateral meniscectomy or meniscus repair) by one of two orthopaedic surgeons were asked to complete three PROMIS-CAT forms preoperatively, and at various postoperative visits. The three administered forms were as follows: PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), PROMIS Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), and PROMIS Depression (PROMIS-D). Average t-scores were analyzed across the time points within each domain. Additionally, the MCID for each PROMIS domain was calculated. Finally, predictive preoperative score cutoffs were determined for each domain with respect to MCID. Results: Average PROMIS t-score improved significantly in each domain from the preoperative to 6 weeks postoperative timepoint (38.6 ± 6.9 v 44.0 ± 3.5, 63.3 ± 6.1 v 55.3 ± 3.0, and 48.2 ± 9.6 v 44.2 ± 4.8) for PROMIS PF, PI, and D, respectively (Figure I). MCID values were calculated following a distribution-based methodology. These values were 3.48, 3.09, and 4.82, respectively. Of patients undergoing meniscus surgeries, 71.0%, 80.2% and 58.8% of patients achieved MCID respectively. After construction of prognostic preoperative score cutoffs in each PROMIS domain, 96.3%, 94.7% and 91.7% of patients meeting the prognostic cutoff scores achieved MCID, respectively (Table I). Conclusion: With respect to PROMIS CAT forms, significant improvement was detected at 6 weeks postoperatively in each of three domains, suggesting these surgeries are effective. Additionally, our results suggest that preoperative PROMIS scores can predict operative success in the form of achieving MCID. [Figure: see text][Table: see text]

Thrombolysis of Postoperative Acute Pulmonary Embolism with a Thrombus in Transit

Right heart thrombus in transit clot (RHTT) associated with a pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a rare but potentially fatal diagnosis. Early diagnosis and immediate intervention are crucial. This report describes the case of a healthy, physically active 32-year-old female who presented 19 days postoperatively, following an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and partial lateral meniscectomy with a saddle PE, RHTT, and right ventricular (RV) strain. The patient received half of the standard dose of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) in combination with anticoagulation and survived. Case reports of RHTT will inform future studies designed to evaluate whether and when thrombolysis should be administered.