Reduction of Postoperative Hip Arthroscopy Pain With an Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Iliaca Block: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 682-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Glomset ◽  
Eugene Kim ◽  
John M. Tokish ◽  
Suzanne D. Renfro ◽  
Tyler B. Seckel ◽  
...  

Background: Ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca blocks have been used for pain control after hip arthroscopy. There is little evidence regarding their effectiveness in comparison with other pain control modalities in patients who have undergone hip arthroscopy. Purpose: To compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided fascia iliac block with intra-articular ropivacaine in controlling pain after hip arthroscopy. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Between 2015 and 2017, patients (N = 95) undergoing hip arthroscopy were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The first group received an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca block with 50 to 60 mL of 0.35% ropivacaine. The second group received an intra-articular injection of 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine at the completion of the surgical case. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores in the recovery room; at postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge; and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and PACU narcotic usage (converted to morphine equivalent use) as well as readmission rates, PACU recovery time, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: Postoperative pain across all points did not significantly differ between the groups. Intraoperative and PACU narcotics did not differ significantly between the groups. Readmission rates, PACU recovery time, and postoperative nausea and vomiting did not significantly differ between the groups. There were no associated complications in either group. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca block for hip arthroscopy had no clinical advantage when compared with onetime intra-articular ropivacaine injection. Registration: NCT02365961 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0014
Author(s):  
John Larson Glomset ◽  
Eugene J. Kim ◽  
John M. Tokish ◽  
Suzanne D. Renfro ◽  
Tyler B. Seckel ◽  
...  

Objectives: Ultrasound guided fascia-Iliaca blocks have been used for pain control following hip arthroscopy. There is little evidence regarding their effectiveness in comparison to other pain control modalities in hip arthroscopy patients. To compare efficacy of ultrasound guided fascia iliac block with intra-articular ropivacaine in controlling pain after hip arthroscopy. Methods: Between 2015 and 2017, 95 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The first group received an ultrasound-guided fascia-iliaca block with 50-60mLs of 0.35% ropivacaine. The second group received intra-articular injection of 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine at the completion of the surgical case. Primary outcomes were post-operative pain scores in the recovery room, at PACU discharge, at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and PACU narcotic usage (converted to morphine equivalent use) as well as readmission rates, PACU recovery time and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Results: Postoperative pain across all points did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Intraoperative and PACU narcotics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Readmission rates, PACU recovery time and PONV did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. There were no associated complications in either group. Conclusion: Ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block for hip arthroscopy had no clinical advantage when compared to one time intra-articular ropivacaine injection. Furthermore, an intraarticular injection decreases costs and is a safe and more efficient modality for postoperative pain control following hip arthroscopy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Xiaohong Chen ◽  
Bingqian Liu ◽  
Xiaoling Liang ◽  
Jiaqing Li ◽  
Tao Li ◽  
...  

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of ketorolac with local anesthesia compared to local anesthesia alone for perioperative pain control in day care retinal detachment surgery. The randomized controlled trial included 59 eyes of 59 participants for retinal detachment surgery who were randomly assigned (1 : 1) into the ketorolac (K) group and control (C) group. All participants underwent conventional local anesthesia while patients in the K group received an extra administration of preoperative ketorolac. Participants in the K group had a statistically significantly lower intraoperative NRS score (median 1.0 versus 3.0, P=0.003), lower postoperative NRS score (median 0 versus 1.0, P=0.035), fewer proportion of rescue analgesic requirement (10% versus 34.5%, P=0.023), and lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (13.3% versus 41.4%, P=0.015) compared to the C group. Intraocular pressure (IOP) changes (△IOP) were significantly reduced in the K group (median 1.9 versus 3.0, P=0.038) compared to the C group 24 hours postoperatively. In conclusion, the combination of local anesthesia with ketorolac provides better pain control in retinal detachment surgery compared to local anesthesia alone. The beneficial effect of ketorolac with local anesthesia may contribute to a wider-spread adoption of day care retinal detachment surgery. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02729285.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-119
Author(s):  
Amjad Nadeem ◽  
Mirza Nasheed Baig ◽  
Nayyer Ayub ◽  
Farhan Ahmed

Objectives: To evaluate the effect on post tonsillectomy pain control with IV and infiltrated dexamethasone and infiltrated bupivacaine. Methodology: This randomized controlled trial study was conducted in the department of ENT and neck surgery of Holy Family hospital, Rawalpindi, over a period of one year from May 2019 to May 2020. A total of 140 pediatric patients were selected and were divided into four equal groups randomly by lottery method. Patients in all four groups had endotracheal intubation with general anesthesia. As premedication, all the patients received intravenous midazolam (1mg). Intravenous fentanyl (1.5mg/kg) and propofol (2.5 mg/kg) followed by endotracheal intubation facilitated with atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) were used as general anesthesia in all patients. Results: There was no significant (p-value >0.05) difference in gender, age of children, postoperative heart rate, postoperative SPO2, and fentanyl consumption. The duration of surgery was significantly (p-value < 0.05) different in all four groups. According to the results, no significant (p-value >0.05) difference was found based on postoperative nausea and vomiting and the requirement of antiemetics. The requirement of analgesics was significantly (p-value <0.05) different among four groups. Minimum number (22.86%) of patients who required the analgesic were in IV dexamethasone group and highest requirement rate (60%) was found in local dexamethasone group followed by bupivacaine (48.57%) group. Conclusion: Intravenous dexamethasone was found to be more effective for early postoperative pain control and reduction in requirement of analgesics. The use of dexamethasone can be a preferred choice in patients undergoing tonsillectomy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document