Pain control according to the periprostatic nerve block site in magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal targeted prostate biopsy

We analyzed the intensity of pain at each site of systemic prostate biopsy (SBx) and compared the intensity of pain among magnetic resonance (MRI)-targeted transrectal biopsies according to the periprostatic nerve block (PNB) site. We collected data from 229 consecutive patients who had undergone MRI-targeted biopsy. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the site of PNB (base versus base and apex PNB). Pain was quantified at the following time points: probe insertion, injection at the prostate base, injection at the prostate apex, MRI cognitive biopsy (CBx), MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy (FBx), SBx, and 15 min after biopsy. For all biopsy methods, the average pain were significantly higher in the base PNB group than in the base and apex PNB group (CBx, p < 0.001; FBx, p = 0.015; SBx, p < 0.001). In the base and apex PNB group, FBx was significantly more painful than SBx (p = 0.024). Overall, regardless of the PNB site, pain at the anterior sites was more than that at the posterior sites in FBx (p = 0.039). Base and apex PNB provided better overall pain control than base-only PNB in all biopsy methods. In the base and apex PNB group, FBx was more painful than CBx and SBx.

MRI-based nomogram for the prediction of prostate cancer diagnosis: A multi-centre validated patient–physician decision tool

Objective: To update and externally validate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based nomogram for predicting prostate biopsy outcomes with a multi-centre cohort. Materials and methods: Prospective data from five UK-based centres were analysed. All men were biopsy naïve. Those with missing data, no MRI, or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 30 ng/mL were excluded. Logistic regression analysis was used to confirm predictors of prostate cancer outcomes including MRI-PIRADS (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) score, PSA density, and age. Clinically significant disease was defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group ⩾ 2 (Gleason grade ⩾ 7). Biopsy strategy included transrectal and transperineal approaches. Nomograms were produced using logistic regression analysis results. Results: A total of 506 men were included in the analysis with median age 66 (interquartile range (IQR) = 60–69). Median PSA was 6.6 ng/mL (IQR = 4.72–9.26). PIRADS ⩾ 3 was reported in 387 (76.4%). Grade Group ⩾ 2 detection was 227 (44.9%) and 318 (62.8%) for any cancer. Performance of the MRI-based nomogram was an area under curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.81–0.88) for Grade Group ⩾ 2% and 0.85 (95% CI = 0.82–0.88) for any prostate cancer. Conclusion: We present external validation of a novel MRI-based nomogram in a multi-centre UK-based cohort, showing good discrimination in identifying men at high risk of having clinically significant disease. These findings support this risk calculator use in the prostate biopsy decision-making process. Level of evidence: 2c

The Role of the Serum 25-OH Vitamin D Level in Detecting Prostate Cancer in Men with Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels

We aimed to determine whether vitamin D levels before prostate biopsy have diagnostic value for clinically significant prostate cancer. The study cohort included patients who underwent prostate biopsy. A total of 224 patients were enrolled in our study, and serum vitamin D levels were measured from February 2016 to December 2019 in routine laboratory tests. To determine the relationship between vitamin D levels and the aggressiveness of prostate cancer, we used multivariate analysis. Based on the histopathological results, the serum vitamin D level was marginally lower in the group with higher positive cores and pT3 or higher, and the serum vitamin D level was significantly lower in the large tumor volume group. In the univariate analysis, the prostate cancer diagnosis rate was associated with low vitamin D levels. In clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis, low vitamin D levels were found in the univariate (odds ratio [OR], 0.955; P<0.001) and multivariate (OR, 0.944; P=0.027) analyses. In conclusion, we found that the incidence of prostate cancer tends to increase as the vitamin D level is lower in the Asian population, and this is particularly helpful in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer.