Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With or Without Derotational Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Treating Recurrent Patellar Dislocation With Increased Femoral Anteversion: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Background: Controversy exists regarding the surgical treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) with an increased femoral anteversion angle (FAA). Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) either alone or combined with derotational distal femoral osteotomy (DDFO) results in favorable clinical outcomes. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of MPFL-R versus MPFL-R with DDFO in treating RPD with increased FAA (>30°). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between January 2014 and December 2017, 126 patients (135 knees) with RPD and increased FAA (>30°) were surgically treated using MPFL-R with or without DDFO and eligible for this retrospective study. These patients were allocated into 2 groups based on whether an additional DDFO was performed: the DDFO group (MPFL-R + DDFO with or without tibial tubercle transfer; n = 66) and the control group (MPFL-R with or without tibial tubercle transfer; n = 69). Pre- and postoperative patellar stability was measured using stress radiography. Patellar maltracking (J-sign) and patient-reported outcomes (Kujala, International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, and Tegner scores) were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying the results in terms of the severity of preoperative patellar maltracking (low-grade vs high-grade J-sign). Results: A total of 135 knees (126 patients) with a mean follow-up time of 3.7 ± 1.2 years were evaluated in the present study. The rates of postoperative MPFL residual graft laxity and residual J-sign were significantly lower in the DDFO group than in the control group (6% vs 19%, P = .028; 33% vs 54%, P = .018). The DDFO group had significantly higher Kujala (82.3 vs 76.7; P = .001) and Lysholm (83.7 vs 77.7; P = .034) scores than the control group had postoperatively. For patients with a preoperative high-grade J-sign, further subgroup analysis demonstrated that the DDFO group had a significantly lower rate of MPFL residual graft laxity than the control group had (18% vs 57%; P = .029). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, treatment of RPD with increased femoral anteversion using MPFL-R with DDFO yielded more favorable subjective and objective outcomes than did MPFL-R without DDFO, and this circumstance was more remarkable when the patients had a preoperative high-grade J-sign.

Download Full-text

Combined Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction and Tibial Tubercle Transfer Results at a Follow-Up of 2 years

The Journal of Knee Surgery ◽

10.1055/s-0036-1579665 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 30 (01) ◽

pp. 42-46 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Marius Calciu ◽

Narlaka Jayasekera ◽

Peter Schranz ◽

Vipul Mandalia ◽

Riaz Ahmad

Keyword(s):

Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽

Tibial Tubercle ◽

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Tibial Tubercle Transfer

Download Full-text

Closing-Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy Combined with Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation with Genu Valgum

10.21203/rs.3.rs-38833/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Lizhong Jing ◽

Xiaole Wang ◽

Kun Liu ◽

Xiaotan Wang ◽

Lu Jiang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Patellar Dislocation ◽

Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽

Weight Bearing ◽

Femoral Osteotomy ◽

Genu Valgum ◽

Imaging Findings ◽

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Recurrent Patellar Dislocation ◽

Distal Femoral Osteotomy

Abstract Background: Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) is a well-established procedure for addressing recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) in young patients. However, for RPD with genu valgum, simultaneous MPFLR and closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (CWDFO) may be a promising procedure yet rarely reported. This study’s purpose was to observe and analyse the clinical and imaging findings of CWDFO combined with MPFLR for RPD with genu valgum.Methods: From May 2015 to Apirl 2018, 25 patients with RPD and genu valgum were surgically treated in our department. Anteroposterior long-leg, weight-bearing, lower-extremity radiographs, lateral radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans of the patellofemoral joint were obtained, and the femorotibial angle (FTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), weight-bearing line rate (WBLR), patellar height, patellar lateral shift (PLS) and tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance were analysed. Validated knee scores, such as the Kujala, Lysholm, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Tegner socres, were evaluated preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively.Results: 25 patients, with an average age of 19.8 years (14–27), were evaluated. All patients had been able to achieve a better sports level without any problems during the 2-year follow-up period. There has been no recurrence of patellar instability. Compared with preoperation, the FTA, mLDFA, WBLR and PLS showed statistically significant improvement following the procedure (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, no significant differences in the Insall index and TT-TG distance was found. The mean Kujala score, average Lysholm score, VAS score and Tegner socres showed significant improvement postoperatively.Conclusions: CWDFO combined with MPFLR is a suitable treatment for RPD with genu valgum, as it leads to significant improvement in the clinical and imaging findings of the knee in the short term.

Download Full-text

Closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation with genu valgum

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽

10.1186/s12891-021-04554-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Lizhong Jing ◽

Xiaole Wang ◽

Xiaoliang Qu ◽

Kun Liu ◽

Xiaotan Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Patellar Dislocation ◽

Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽

Weight Bearing ◽

Femoral Osteotomy ◽

Genu Valgum ◽

Imaging Findings ◽

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Recurrent Patellar Dislocation ◽

Distal Femoral Osteotomy

Abstract Background Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) is a well-established procedure for addressing recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) in young patients. However, despite being a promising procedure for RPD with genu valgum, there is a scarcity of reports on simultaneous MPFLR and closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (CWDFO). The purpose of the present study was to observe and analyse the clinical and imaging findings of CWDFO combined with MPFLR for RPD with genu valgum. Methods From May 2015 to April 2018, 25 patients with RPD and genu valgum were surgically treated in our department. Anteroposterior long-leg, weight-bearing, lower-extremity radiographs, lateral radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans of the patellofemoral joint were obtained, and the anatomical femorotibial angle (aFTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), weight-bearing line rate (WBLR), patellar height, patellar lateral shift (PLS) and tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance were analysed. Validated knee scores, such as the Kujala, Lysholm, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Tegner socres, were evaluated preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Results 25 patients, with an average age of 19.8 years (14–27), were evaluated. During the 2-year follow-up period, all patients were able to achieve a better sports level without any problems, with no recurrence of patellar instability. Compared with preoperation, the aFTA, mLDFA, WBLR and PLS showed statistically significant improvement following the procedure (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, no significant differences in the Insall index and TT-TG distance were found. The mean Kujala score, average Lysholm score, VAS score and Tegner socres showed significant postoperative improvement. Conclusions CWDFO combined with MPFLR is a suitable treatment for RPD with genu valgum, and can lead to significant improvement in the clinical and imaging findings of the knee in the short term.

Download Full-text

Outcomes And Reoperation Rates After Tibial Tubercle Transfer And Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967120s00129 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (3_suppl2) ◽

pp. 2325967120S0012

Author(s):

Dax T. Varkey ◽

Jacob Gorbaty ◽

Susan Odum ◽

Dana P. Piasecki ◽

James E. Fleischli

Keyword(s):

Knee Pain ◽

Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽

Patellofemoral Instability ◽

Reoperation Rate ◽

Tibial Tubercle ◽

Trochlear Groove ◽

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Tibial Tubercle Transfer ◽

Reoperation Rates

Objectives: Patellofemoral instability (PFI) is a painful condition affecting approximately 7 patients per 100,000 in the US. Unfortunately, as many as 50% of young patients with patellar dislocations can go on to recurrent instability and have debilitating symptoms. With a wide range of operative techniques, and subsequent reoperation and complication rate cited in the literature, it becomes challenging to create an appropriate algorithm with which to treat patients. The goal of our study was to determine the reoperation rate, risk factors for reoperation, and patient reported outcomes after Tibial Tubercle Transfer (TTT), Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction (MPFLR), or a combination of the two, for patellofemoral instability surgery. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent MPFLR and TTT by querying the surgical database at our single institution from 2002-2018 for CPT codes associated with the procedures (CPT-27418, CPT-27427). Patients were included if they had an MPFLR and/or TTT performed for PFI whether recurrent or single dislocation. Patients were excluded if either additional ligamentous reconstruction was performed simultaneously, indications for the procedure was for a condition other than PFI or if records were incomplete. 497 patients were eligible to be included. Radiographic measurements, demographic parameters, and subsequent revision procedures and their indications were identified. A modified anterior knee pain survey was conducted by mail and with follow-up phone survey. Chi-Square Tests or Fishers Exact Test were used to compare differences for categorical data and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare the non-parametric pain scores. A multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between patient demographics, radiographic parameters and procedure type. Results: The overall rate of reoperation amongst all patients was 25.6%. The rate of reoperation for MPFL alone (19.9%) was lower than that of TTT alone (34.8%) or both procedures simultaneously (26.4%) (P = .007). There was a trend towards increased major reoperation rates and revision stabilization procedures in patients with isolated TTT (P = .16). There was no association with tibial tubercle to trochlear groove (TTTG) distance and the rate of reoperation (P = .99). A preoperative Dejour classification D was associated with a higher reoperation rate (28%) than those with Dejour A-C (P=.43). A Caton-Deschamp ratio >1.3 increased the odds of having a revision stabilization surgery (odds ratio 2.303). Patients who had a revision surgery for any reason were more likely to report pain while walking compared to those who did not (P = <.0001). Conclusion: The overall reoperation after PFI surgery is higher than previously reported. Patients who underwent further procedures were more likely to report continued knee pain when walking. Our results would suggest that patients with trochlear dysplasia and patella alta are more likely to undergo future procedures for instability, and may benefit from more aggressive initial treatment, such as MPFLR and TTT in combination.

Download Full-text