Minimum 10-Year Outcomes of Primary Arthroscopic Transosseous-Equivalent Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110154
Author(s):  
Adam M. Johannsen ◽  
Justin W. Arner ◽  
Bryant P. Elrick ◽  
Philip-C. Nolte ◽  
Dylan R. Rakowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Modern rotator cuff repair techniques demonstrate favorable early and midterm outcomes, but long-term results have yet to be reported. Purpose: To determine 10-year outcomes and survivorship after arthroscopic double-row transosseous-equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence 4. Methods: The primary TOE rotator cuff repair procedure was performed using either a knotted suture bridge or knotless tape bridge technique on a series of patients with 1 to 3 tendon full-thickness rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus. Only patients who were 10 years postsurgery were included. Patient-reported outcomes were collected pre- and postoperatively, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and satisfaction. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. Failure was defined as progression to revision surgery. Results: A total of 91 shoulders (56 men, 31 women) were included between October 2005 and December 2009. Mean follow-up was 11.5 years (range, 10.0-14.1 years). Of 91 shoulders, 5 (5.5%) failed and required revision surgery. Patient-reported outcomes for patients who survived were known for 80% (69/86). Outcomes scores at final follow-up were as follows: ASES, 93.1 ± 10.8; SANE, 87.5 ± 14.2; QuickDASH, 11.1 ± 13.5; and SF-12 physical component summary (PCS), 49.2 ± 10.1. There were statistically significant declines in ASES, SANE, and SF-12 PCS from the 5-year to 10-year follow-up, but none of these changes met the minimally clinically important difference threshold. Median satisfaction at final follow-up was 10 (range, 3-10). From this cohort, Kaplan-Meier survivorship demonstrated a 94.4% survival rate at a minimum of 10 years. Conclusion: Arthroscopic TOE rotator cuff repair demonstrates high patient satisfaction and low revision rates at a mean follow-up of 11.5 years. This information may be directly utilized in surgical decision making and preoperative patient counseling regarding the longevity of modern double-row rotator cuff repair.

scholarly journals Randomized Prospective Trial of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff With or Without Acromioplasty: No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes at Long-term Follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Robert Waterman ◽  
Jonathan Newgren ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
Brandon C. Cabarcas ◽  
Bernard R. Bach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Objectives: To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty. Methods: Between 2007-2011, prospectively-enrolled patients undergoing arthroscopic repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears were previously randomized into either acromioplasty or non-acromioplasty groups. Patients with death, advanced neurologic conditions, or subsequent shoulder arthroplasty were excluded. Baseline and long-term follow-up questionnaires, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and Constant scores were obtained. Rates of revision rotator cuff surgery, or secondary reoperation were recorded. Averages with standard deviation (SD) were calculated, and t-tests were utilized to compare outcomes of interest between cohorts. Results: After exclusion of 5 additional patients from the short-term follow-up study, 66 of 90 patients (73.3%) were available at 92.4 months (±10.5). Comparison of baseline demographics and intraoperative information revealed no significant differences, including age, gender, workers compensation, acute mechanism of injury, tear size, degree of retraction, and surgical technique (e.g. single- vs. double-row). At final follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences according to ASES (p=0.33), VAS pain (p=0.79), Constant (p=0.17), SST (p=0.05), UCLA (p=0.19), and SF-12 (p=0.79) in patients with and without acromioplasty (Figure 1). One patient with acromioplasty (2.9%) and two patients without acromioplasty (6.3%) sustained atraumatic recurrent rotator cuff tear with secondary repair (p=0.99). Conclusion: Combined acromioplasty and rotator cuff repair offer no significant long-term benefits in patient-reported outcomes or secondary surgery when compared to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair alone. [Figure: see text]

scholarly journals Sex-Based Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 232596711988195
Author(s):  
Stephen D. Daniels ◽  
Cory M. Stewart ◽  
Kirsten D. Garvey ◽  
Emily M. Brook ◽  
Laurence D. Higgins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Rotator cuff repair is one of the most common surgical procedures performed on the shoulder. Previous studies have indicated that pain and disability can vary significantly between patients with similarly appearing rotator cuff tears on diagnostic imaging. Prior literature has compared functional outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatments as well as variability in surgical techniques. However, few studies have examined postoperative outcomes based on patient factors such as sex. Purpose: To compare patient-reported outcomes after rotator cuff repair between men and women. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 283 patients (153 male, 130 female) who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were included in this study; of those, 275 patients (97.2%) completed 1-year follow-up. Patient-reported pain visual analog scale (VAS), Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey (VR-12 mental and physical components), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores were collected preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively using an electronic outcomes system. Results: Women reported higher VAS pain scores when compared with men preoperatively ( P < .01) and at 2 weeks ( P < .01), 6 weeks ( P < .01), and 3 months ( P = .02) postoperatively. Additionally, women experienced a greater overall change in the mean VAS score preoperatively when compared with 1 year postoperatively ( P < .01). The use of narcotic pain medication 2 weeks after surgery was greater in women ( P = .032). Women had significantly lower preoperative VR-12 mental scores ( P = .03) and experienced a greater increase in the mean VR-12 mental score preoperatively when compared with 1 year postoperatively ( P < .01). Men had higher ASES scores preoperatively ( P < .01) and at 3 months postoperatively ( P < .01). Women experienced a greater overall change in the ASES score preoperatively when compared with 1 year postoperatively ( P < .01). Conclusion: Women reported greater pain and decreased shoulder function compared with men during the initial 3 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. There were no sex-based differences in patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up. The results of this study indicate that there are sex-related differences in the early postoperative recovery of patients undergoing rotator cuff repair, contributing to postoperative expectations for both clinicians and patients alike.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of an All-Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis Using the Anterolateral Anchor During Concomitant Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596712095914
Author(s):  
Mitchell B. Meghpara ◽  
William Schulz ◽  
Rafael A. Buerba ◽  
Elan J. Golan ◽  
Dharmesh Vyas
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Repeat Operation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon frequently occurs concomitantly with rotator cuff tears, necessitating a surgical treatment, often in the form of a tenodesis procedure. Many techniques for a tenodesis exist; however, they often require additional implants or a separate incision. Purpose: To report an average of 2-year outcomes of an all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis employing the stay sutures from the anterolateral anchor during concomitant double-row rotator cuff repair (RCR). Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent an all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis during concomitant double-row RCR by the senior author between January 2014 and May 2018. Patients were included if they underwent this procedure and had baseline preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with a minimum of 1 year of postoperative PROs for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score. Additionally, patient data, surgical history, postoperative complications, and satisfaction were reported. Results: Fifteen patients were eligible for the study. There were 12 (80%) men and 3 (20%) women with a mean age of 50.0 years (range, 35-64 years). The mean follow-up time was 25.2 months (range, 13-63 months). Six of 15 (40%) patients also had an arthroscopic subscapularis repair performed. ASES shoulder scores improved from 37.1 preoperatively to 94.1 postoperatively ( P < .001), and VAS scores improved from 6.4 preoperatively to 0.5 postoperatively ( P < .001). One patient who underwent concomitant subscapularis repair reported continued anterior groove pain. No patients experienced biceps cramping, developed a deformity, or required a repeat operation at the final follow-up. Overall, 93.3% of the patients reported being highly satisfied with their surgery. Conclusion: This study presents the clinical results of an all-arthroscopic technique for concomitant double-row RCR and biceps tenodesis, which resulted in high rates of patient satisfaction and significant improvement in reported shoulder outcome and pain scores. Additionally, this technique offers the potential benefits of avoiding a secondary incision, which may decrease surgical morbidity while also decreasing cost by eliminating the need for an extra, tenodesis-specific implant.

Radiographic shoulder parameters and their relationship to outcomes following rotator cuff repair: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
pp. 175857321989598
Author(s):  
Musa B Zaid ◽  
Nathan M Young ◽  
Valentina Pedoia ◽  
Brian T Feeley ◽  
C Benjamin Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Critical Shoulder Angle ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Acromion Index ◽  
Bony Morphology ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Shoulder Angle

Background Anatomic parameters, such as the critical shoulder angle and acromion index, have emerged as methods to quantify scapular anatomy and may contribute to rotator cuff pathology. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the published literature on influences of scapular morphology on the development of re-tears and patient-reported outcomes following rotator cuff repair. Methods A systematic review of the Embase and PubMed databases was performed to identify published studies on the potential influence of scapular bony morphology and re-tear rates and patient-reported outcomes after rotator cuff repair. Studies were reviewed by two authors. Results A total of 615 unique titles and 49 potentially relevant abstracts were reviewed, with eight published manuscripts identified for inclusion. Two of three papers reported no relationship between these acromion index and rotator cuff re-tear rate, while one paper found an increased re-tear rate. All three studies on critical shoulder angle found a significant association between critical shoulder angle and cuff re-tear rate. There was no clear relationship between any bony morphologic measurement and patient-reported outcomes after rotator cuff repair. Conclusions Rotator cuff re-tear rate appears to be significantly associated with the critical shoulder angle and glenoid inclination, while not clearly associated with acromial morphologic measurements.

Establishing Maximal Medical Improvement After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 1000-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Zuke ◽  
Timothy S. Leroux ◽  
Bonnie P. Gregory ◽  
Austin Black ◽  
Brian Forsythe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Orthopaedic Care ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: As health care transitions from a pay-for-service to a pay-for-performance infrastructure, the value of orthopaedic care must be defined accurately. Significant efforts have been made in defining quality and cost in arthroplasty; however, there remains a lag in ambulatory orthopaedic care. Purpose: Two-year follow-up has been a general requirement for reporting outcomes after rotator cuff repair. However, this time requirement has not been established scientifically and is of increasing importance in the era of value-based health care. Given that arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a common ambulatory orthopaedic procedure, the purpose of this study was to establish a time frame for maximal medical improvement (the state when improvement has stabilized) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted, identifying studies reporting sequential patient-reported outcomes up to a minimum of 2 years after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The primary clinical outcome was patient-reported outcomes at 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up. Secondary clinical outcomes included range of motion, strength, retears, and complications. Clinically significant improvement was determined between various time intervals by use of the minimal clinically important difference. Results: The review included 19 studies including 1370 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair. Clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes was seen up to 1 year after rotator cuff repair, but no clinical significance was noted from 1 year to 2 years. The majority of improvement in strength and range of motion was seen up to 6 months, but no clinically meaningful improvement was seen thereafter. All reported complications and the majority of retears occurred within 6 months after rotator cuff repair. Conclusion: After rotator cuff repair, a clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, and strength was seen up to 1 year after surgery, but not beyond this. This information is important not only to establish appropriate patient expectations but also to determine a time frame for outcome collection after surgery to better define value in orthopaedic care.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic undersurface rotator cuff repair versus conventional arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair – Comparable results at 2-year follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949901875757
Author(s):  
Benjamin Fu Hong Ang ◽  
Jerry Yongqiang Chen ◽  
William Yeo ◽  
Denny Tijauw Tjoen Lie ◽  
Paul Chee Cheng Chang
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Cuff Repair

scholarly journals All-Suture and Solid Medial Row Anchors Produce Similar Clinical Outcomes for Double Row Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair (227)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0033
Author(s):  
John Feldman ◽  
Mims Ochsner ◽  
Glenn Fleisig ◽  
Rob Tatum ◽  
Lindsay Grosz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Suture Bridge ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Anchor Fixation

Objectives: All-suture anchor use for rotator cuff repair is increasing. Potential benefits of these anchors include less bone loss from anchor hole drilling and decreased injury to the chondral surface with anchor pullout. Minimal evidence exists comparing clinical outcomes of all suture to solid medial row anchor fixation in double row suture bridge rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes for rotator cuff tears treated with all-suture medial row anchors to those treated with more traditional solid anchors. The null hypothesis was that there is no difference in outcomes between the all-suture and solid anchor rotator cuff repairs. Methods: Three sports medicine fellowship trained surgeons performed rotator cuff repairs using the double row suture bridge technique with minimum 3 years of follow up. Patients were separated into two groups based on whether or not they received all-suture or solid anchor fixation for the medial row of their repair. All lateral row fixation was performed with solid anchors. Primary outcomes were evaluated with telephone follow-up and included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Rehabilitation protocol was the same for all subjects in the study. Results: 3 sports medicine fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons performed 153 rotator cuff repairs. 91 of these subjects had all-suture fixation of the medial row and 62 received solid anchor fixation. Follow up was 3.6 years ± 0.6 for the all-suture group and 3.7 years ± 0.6 in the solid anchor group (p= 0.28). ASES scores were 92 ± 16 in the all-suture group and 90 ± 17 in the solid group (p =0.35). SANE scores were 91 ± 13 in the all-suture and also 91 ± 13 in the solid anchor cohort (p = 0.97). VAS scores were 1.1 ± 2.0 in the all-suture and 0.7± 1.8 in the solid anchor group (p=0.17). There were no significant differences between groups with regards to re-operation rate or anchor configuration. Conclusions: All suture anchors used in medial row fixation for double row suture bridge rotator cuff repairs have similar clinical outcomes to rotator cuff tears treated in similar fashion with solid medial row anchors.

Long-term Results of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Follow-up Study Comparing Single-Row Versus Double-Row Fixation Techniques

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 1568-1574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Plachel ◽  
Paul Siegert ◽  
Katja Rüttershoff ◽  
Kathi Thiele ◽  
Doruk Akgün ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Fixation Techniques ◽  
Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) with suture anchor–based fixation techniques has replaced former open and mini-open approaches. Nevertheless, long-term studies are scarce, and lack of knowledge exists about whether single-row (SR) or double-row (DR) methods are superior in clinical and anatomic results. Purpose: To analyze long-term results after arthroscopic RCR in patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears and to compare functional and radiographic outcomes between SR and DR repair techniques at least 10 years after surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between 2005 and 2006, 40 patients with a symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tear (supraspinatus tendon tear with or without a tear of the infraspinatus tendon) underwent arthroscopic RCR with either an SR repair with a modified Mason-Allen suture–grasping technique (n = 20) or a DR repair with a suture bridge fixation technique (n = 20). All patients were enrolled in a long-term clinical evaluation, with the Constant score (CS) as the primary outcome measure. Furthermore, an ultrasound examination was performed to assess tendon integrity and conventional radiographs to evaluate secondary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Results: A total of 27 patients, of whom 16 were treated with an SR repair and 11 with a DR repair, were followed up after a mean ± SD period of 12 ± 1 years (range, 11-14 years). Five patients underwent revision surgery on the affected shoulder during follow-up period, which led to 22 patients being included. The overall CS remained stable at final follow-up when compared with short-term follow-up (81 ± 8 vs 83 ± 19 points; P = .600). An increasing number of full-thickness retears were found: 6 of 22 (27%) at 2 years and 9 of 20 (45%) at 12 years after surgery. While repair failure negatively affected clinical results as shown by the CS ( P < .05), no significant difference was found between the fixation techniques ( P = .456). In general, progressive osteoarthritic changes were observed, with tendon integrity as a key determinant. Conclusion: Arthroscopic RCR with either an SR or a DR fixation technique provided good clinical long-term results. Repair failure was high, with negative effects on clinical results and the progression of secondary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. While DR repair slightly enhanced tendon integrity at long-term follow-up, no clinical superiority to SR repair was found.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document