Clinical Evaluation of Conversational Speech Fluency in the Acute Phase of Acquired Childhood Aphasia: Does a Fluency/Nonfluency Dichotomy Exist?

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 345-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo R. van Dongen ◽  
Philippe F. Paquier ◽  
Wouter L. Creten ◽  
John van Borsel ◽  
Coriene E. Catsman-Berrevoets
2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (05) ◽  
pp. 345
Author(s):  
Hugo R. van Dongen ◽  
Philippe F. Paquier ◽  
Wouter L. Creten ◽  
John van Borsel ◽  
Coriene E. Catsman-Berrevoets

2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (6) ◽  
pp. 536-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Ogawa ◽  
K Otsuka ◽  
A Hagiwara ◽  
T Inagaki ◽  
S Shimizu ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectives:To determine the characteristics of acute phase nystagmus in patients with cerebellar lesions, and to identify a useful indicator for differentiating central lesions from peripheral lesions.Methods:Acute phase nystagmus and the appearance of neurological symptoms were retrospectively investigated in 11 patients with cerebellar stroke.Results:At the initial visit, there were no patients with vertical nystagmus, direction-changing gaze evoked nystagmus or pure rotatory nystagmus. There were four cases with no nystagmus and seven cases with horizontal nystagmus at the initial visit. There were no neurological symptoms, except for vertigo and hearing loss, in any cases at the initial visit. The direction and type of nystagmus changed with time, and neurological symptoms other than vertigo appeared subsequently to admission.Conclusion:It is important to observe the changes in nystagmus and other neurological findings for the differential diagnosis of central lesions.


Cortex ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 619-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo R. Van Dongen ◽  
Philippe F. Paquier ◽  
Jan Raes ◽  
Wouter L. Creten

1978 ◽  
Vol 47 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1231-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Marshall ◽  
Deanie Kushner ◽  
David Phillips

This study examined the letter-recognition abilities of 44 aphasic and 10 normal subjects. On a 26-item letter recognition task normal subjects made no errors. Moderately aphasic subjects illustrated minimal difficulty but did not differ significantly in performance from normals. Severely aphasic subjects exhibited marked impairment and made significantly lower letter-recognition scores than moderate aphasic or normal subjects. Type of aphasia as determined by conversational speech fluency (fluent or nonfluent) seemed to affect the letter-recognition performance of the severely aphasic subjects. Fluent severely aphasic subjects made significantly lower scores than all groups; nonfluent severely aphasic subjects made significantly lower scores than all groups except the severe nonfluent group. The types of letter-recognition errors produced by the two severely aphasic groups offer some explanation as to their performance differences. Errors of the latter group were more likely to be related to the stimulus letter; errors from the former group tended to be random. Findings indicate the intactness of the aphasic subject's semantic associational network is important to the letter-recognition process.


2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (2) ◽  
pp. 634-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilian M. G. Bahia‐Oliveira ◽  
Juliana A. S. Gomes ◽  
José R. Cançado ◽  
Teresa C. Ferrari ◽  
Elenice M. Lemos ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan K. Rafaat ◽  
Susan Rvachew ◽  
Rebecca S. C. Russell

Pairs of speech-language pathologists independently rated severity of phonological impairment for 45 preschoolers, aged 30 to 65 months. Children were rated along a continuum from normal to profound. In addition to judging overall severity of impairment, the clinicians provided separate ratings based on citation form and conversational samples. A judgment of intelligibility of conversational speech was also required. Results indicated that interclinician reliability was adequate (80% agreement) for older preschool-aged children (4-1/2 years and above) but that judgments by speechlanguage pathologists were not sufficiently reliable for children under 3-1/2 years of age 40% agreement). Children judged to have age appropriate phonological abilities were not clearly distinguishable from children judged to have a mild delay. Educating speech-language pathologists regarding the normative phonological data that are available with respect to young preschoolers, and ensuring that such data are readily accessible for assessment purposes, is required.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document