Review of the Acuity Scoring Systems for the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and Their Use in Quality Improvement

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Marcin ◽  
Murray M. Pollack
2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 59-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanaa I. Rady ◽  
Shereen A. Mohamed ◽  
Nabil A. Mohssen ◽  
Mohamed ElBaz

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 545-545
Author(s):  
Felicia Sifers ◽  
Leslie Hayes ◽  
Amanda Rogers ◽  
Johanna Robbins ◽  
Stephanie Wilson

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e369
Author(s):  
Neha Gupta ◽  
Amber Sones ◽  
Maegan Powell ◽  
Johanna Robbins ◽  
Stephanie Wilson ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 994.1-994
Author(s):  
Jodi Herbsman ◽  
Yasir Al-Qaqaa ◽  
John Corcoran ◽  
Jennifer Daly ◽  
Tiffany Folks ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blair R. L. Colwell ◽  
Cydni N. Williams ◽  
Serena P. Kelly ◽  
Laura M. Ibsen

Background Mobilization is safe and associated with improved outcomes in critically ill adults, but little is known about mobilization of critically ill children. Objective To implement a standardized mobilization therapy protocol in a pediatric intensive care unit and improve mobilization of patients. Methods A goal-directed mobilization protocol was instituted as a quality improvement project in a 20-bed cardiac and medical-surgical pediatric intensive care unit within an academic tertiary care center. The mobilization goal was based on age and severity of illness. Data on severity of illness, ordered activity limitations, baseline functioning, mobilization level, complications of mobilization, and mobilization barriers were collected. Goal mobilization was defined as a ratio of mobilization level to severity of illness of 1 or greater. Results In 9 months, 567 patient encounters were analyzed, 294 (52%) of which achieved goal mobilization. The mean ratio of mobilization level to severity of illness improved slightly but nonsignificantly. Encounters that met mobilization goals were in younger (P = .04) and more ill (P < .001) patients and were less likely to have barriers (P < .001) than encounters not meeting the goals. Complication rate was 2.5%, with no difference between groups (P = .18). No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions A multidisciplinary, multiprofessional, goal-directed mobilization protocol achieved goal mobilization in more than 50% of patients in this pediatric intensive care unit. Undermobilized patients were older, less ill, and more likely to have mobilization barriers at the patient and provider level.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document