1088: Quality Improvement: Oral Feeding Evaluation Post-Extubation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 545-545
Author(s):  
Felicia Sifers ◽  
Leslie Hayes ◽  
Amanda Rogers ◽  
Johanna Robbins ◽  
Stephanie Wilson
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e369
Author(s):  
Neha Gupta ◽  
Amber Sones ◽  
Maegan Powell ◽  
Johanna Robbins ◽  
Stephanie Wilson ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 994.1-994
Author(s):  
Jodi Herbsman ◽  
Yasir Al-Qaqaa ◽  
John Corcoran ◽  
Jennifer Daly ◽  
Tiffany Folks ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blair R. L. Colwell ◽  
Cydni N. Williams ◽  
Serena P. Kelly ◽  
Laura M. Ibsen

Background Mobilization is safe and associated with improved outcomes in critically ill adults, but little is known about mobilization of critically ill children. Objective To implement a standardized mobilization therapy protocol in a pediatric intensive care unit and improve mobilization of patients. Methods A goal-directed mobilization protocol was instituted as a quality improvement project in a 20-bed cardiac and medical-surgical pediatric intensive care unit within an academic tertiary care center. The mobilization goal was based on age and severity of illness. Data on severity of illness, ordered activity limitations, baseline functioning, mobilization level, complications of mobilization, and mobilization barriers were collected. Goal mobilization was defined as a ratio of mobilization level to severity of illness of 1 or greater. Results In 9 months, 567 patient encounters were analyzed, 294 (52%) of which achieved goal mobilization. The mean ratio of mobilization level to severity of illness improved slightly but nonsignificantly. Encounters that met mobilization goals were in younger (P = .04) and more ill (P < .001) patients and were less likely to have barriers (P < .001) than encounters not meeting the goals. Complication rate was 2.5%, with no difference between groups (P = .18). No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions A multidisciplinary, multiprofessional, goal-directed mobilization protocol achieved goal mobilization in more than 50% of patients in this pediatric intensive care unit. Undermobilized patients were older, less ill, and more likely to have mobilization barriers at the patient and provider level.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 57-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina M. Rohlik ◽  
Karen R. Fryer ◽  
Sandeep Tripathi ◽  
Julie M. Duncan ◽  
Heather L. Coon ◽  
...  

BACKGROUNDDelirium is associated with poor outcomes in adults but is less extensively studied in children.OBJECTIVESTo describe a quality improvement initiative to implement delirium assessment in a pediatric intensive care unit and to identify barriers to delirium screening completion.METHODSA survey identified perceived barriers to delirium assessment. Failure modes and effects analysis characterized factors likely to impede assessment. A randomized case-control study evaluated factors affecting assessment by comparing patients always assessed with patients never assessed.RESULTSDelirium assessment was completed in 57% of opportunities over 1 year, with 2% positive screen results. Education improved screening completion by 20%. Barriers to assessment identified by survey (n = 25) included remembering to complete assessments, documentation outside workflow, and “busy patient.” Factors with high risk prediction numbers were lack of time and paper charting. Patients always assessed had more severe illness (median Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 score, 0.90 vs 0.36; P < .001), more developmental disabilities (moderate to severe pediatric cerebral performance category score, 54% vs 32%; P = .007), and admission during lower pediatric intensive care unit census (median [interquartile range], 10 [9–12] vs 12 [10–13]; P < .001) than did those never assessed (each group, n = 80). Patients receiving mechanical ventilation were less likely to be assessed (41.0% vs 51.2%, P < .001).CONCLUSIONSSuccessful implementation of pediatric delirium screening may be associated with early use of quality improvement tools to identify assessment barriers, comprehensive education, monitoring system with feedback, multidisciplinary team involvement, and incorporation into nursing workflow models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document