Contact surface motion paths associated with leg length inequality following unilateral total hip replacement

Author(s):  
Sarah Budenberg ◽  
Anthony Redmond ◽  
Derek White ◽  
Andrew Grainger ◽  
Philip O’Connor ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 539-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony B. McWilliams ◽  
Andrew J. Grainger ◽  
Philip J. O'Connor ◽  
Anthony C. Redmond ◽  
Todd D. Stewart ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony McWilliams ◽  
Todd D. Stewart ◽  
Andrew J. Grainger ◽  
Philip J. O’Connor ◽  
Derrick White ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 513-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junyan Li ◽  
Anthony B. McWilliams ◽  
Zhongmin Jin ◽  
John Fisher ◽  
Martin H. Stone ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faye A Loughenbury ◽  
Anthony B McWilliams ◽  
Todd D Stewart ◽  
Anthony C Redmond ◽  
Martin H Stone

Background: This study reports the results of 2 separate surveys of British Hip Society (BHS) members relating to leg length inequality (LLI) after primary total hip replacement (THR). Survey 1: Investigates the members’ opinions on the effect of LLI on the outcome of THR and explores the acceptable limits of LLI. Survey 2: Reports on the intraoperative techniques currently used by BHS members to minimise LLI after THR. Results - Survey 1: 97% of all surgeons completing the survey believed that LLI can affect the outcome of THR. Results - Survey 2: All surgeons reported using at least 1 intraoperative technique for assessing leg length with a median of 5 techniques. Over 50% of surgeons use 2 or more tests. Conclusion - Survey 1: 89% of surgeons agreed that 15 mm of LLI after primary uncomplicated THR was always acceptable. 90% of surgeons felt that LLI more than 22.74 mm was never acceptable. Conclusion - Survey 2: Despite the multiple published papers on various methods of assessing leg length intraoperatively, the problem of LLI post THR persists. This study highlights the need for further research to develop a simple intraoperative technique with high accuracy and reproducibility.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Anthony McWilliams ◽  
Todd D. Stewart ◽  
Andrew J. Grainger ◽  
Philip J. O'Connor ◽  
Derrick White ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 437-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Pennington ◽  
A Redmond ◽  
T Stewart ◽  
M Stone

Introduction Total hip replacement (THR) is successful and performed commonly. Component placement is a determinant of outcome. Influence of surgeon handedness on component placement has not been considered previously. This study was a radiographic assessment of component positioning with respect to handedness. Early data from 160 patients are reported. Methods Overall, 160 primary THRs for osteoarthritis were included. Equal numbers of left and right THRs were performed by four surgeons, two right-handed and two left-handed. Postoperative radiography was assessed for THR component position by measurement of leg length inequality, acetabular inclination and centre of rotation. Surgeons’ handedness was assessed using the Edinburgh inventory. Results For leg length inequality, no significant interaction was seen between hip side and surgeon handedness. Acetabular inclination angles showed a statistically significant difference, however, depending on hand dominance, with higher inclination angles recorded when operating on the dominant side. There was a trend towards greater medialisation of the centre of rotation on the non-dominant side although this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions Surgeon handedness appears to influence acetabular component position during THR but it is one factor of many that interact to achieve a successful outcome.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 689-694
Author(s):  
Ioannis P. Stathopoulos ◽  
Nicolaos Andrianopoulos ◽  
Dimitrios Paschaloglou ◽  
Kalliopi Lampropoulou-Adamidou ◽  
Maria Spetsaki ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Gebel ◽  
Markus Oszwald ◽  
Bernd Ishaque ◽  
Gaffar Ahmed ◽  
Recha Blessing ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study was to analyse a new concept of using the the minimally invasive direct anterior approach (DAA) in total hip replacement (THR) in combination with the leg positioner (Rotex- Table) and a modified retractor system (Condor). We evaluated retrospectively the first 100 primary THR operated with the new concept between 2009 and 2010, regarding operation data, radiological and clinical outcome (HOOS). All surgeries were perfomed in a standardized operation technique including navigation. The average age of the patients was 68 years (37 to 92 years), with a mean BMI of 26.5 (17 to 43). The mean time of surgery was 80 min. (55 to 130 min). The blood loss showed an average of 511.5 mL (200 to 1000 mL). No intra-operative complications occurred. The postoperative complication rate was 6%. The HOOS increased from 43 points pre-operatively to 90 (max 100 points) 3 months after surgery. The radiological analysis showed an average cup inclination of 43° and a leg length discrepancy in a range of +/- 5 mm in 99%. The presented technique led to excellent clinic results, showed low complication rates and allowed correct implant positions although manpower was saved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document