scholarly journals The impact of surgeon handedness in total hip replacement

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 437-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Pennington ◽  
A Redmond ◽  
T Stewart ◽  
M Stone

Introduction Total hip replacement (THR) is successful and performed commonly. Component placement is a determinant of outcome. Influence of surgeon handedness on component placement has not been considered previously. This study was a radiographic assessment of component positioning with respect to handedness. Early data from 160 patients are reported. Methods Overall, 160 primary THRs for osteoarthritis were included. Equal numbers of left and right THRs were performed by four surgeons, two right-handed and two left-handed. Postoperative radiography was assessed for THR component position by measurement of leg length inequality, acetabular inclination and centre of rotation. Surgeons’ handedness was assessed using the Edinburgh inventory. Results For leg length inequality, no significant interaction was seen between hip side and surgeon handedness. Acetabular inclination angles showed a statistically significant difference, however, depending on hand dominance, with higher inclination angles recorded when operating on the dominant side. There was a trend towards greater medialisation of the centre of rotation on the non-dominant side although this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions Surgeon handedness appears to influence acetabular component position during THR but it is one factor of many that interact to achieve a successful outcome.

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 539-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony B. McWilliams ◽  
Andrew J. Grainger ◽  
Philip J. O'Connor ◽  
Anthony C. Redmond ◽  
Todd D. Stewart ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony McWilliams ◽  
Todd D. Stewart ◽  
Andrew J. Grainger ◽  
Philip J. O’Connor ◽  
Derrick White ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 513-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junyan Li ◽  
Anthony B. McWilliams ◽  
Zhongmin Jin ◽  
John Fisher ◽  
Martin H. Stone ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faye A Loughenbury ◽  
Anthony B McWilliams ◽  
Todd D Stewart ◽  
Anthony C Redmond ◽  
Martin H Stone

Background: This study reports the results of 2 separate surveys of British Hip Society (BHS) members relating to leg length inequality (LLI) after primary total hip replacement (THR). Survey 1: Investigates the members’ opinions on the effect of LLI on the outcome of THR and explores the acceptable limits of LLI. Survey 2: Reports on the intraoperative techniques currently used by BHS members to minimise LLI after THR. Results - Survey 1: 97% of all surgeons completing the survey believed that LLI can affect the outcome of THR. Results - Survey 2: All surgeons reported using at least 1 intraoperative technique for assessing leg length with a median of 5 techniques. Over 50% of surgeons use 2 or more tests. Conclusion - Survey 1: 89% of surgeons agreed that 15 mm of LLI after primary uncomplicated THR was always acceptable. 90% of surgeons felt that LLI more than 22.74 mm was never acceptable. Conclusion - Survey 2: Despite the multiple published papers on various methods of assessing leg length intraoperatively, the problem of LLI post THR persists. This study highlights the need for further research to develop a simple intraoperative technique with high accuracy and reproducibility.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Anthony McWilliams ◽  
Todd D. Stewart ◽  
Andrew J. Grainger ◽  
Philip J. O'Connor ◽  
Derrick White ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 689-694
Author(s):  
Ioannis P. Stathopoulos ◽  
Nicolaos Andrianopoulos ◽  
Dimitrios Paschaloglou ◽  
Kalliopi Lampropoulou-Adamidou ◽  
Maria Spetsaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document