Precarious work and intrinsic job quality: Evidence from Finland, 1984–2013

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pasi Pyöriä ◽  
Satu Ojala
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe LaBriola ◽  
Daniel Schneider

Precarious work, which has become more prevalent in the United States in recent decades, is disproportionately experienced by workers of lower socio-economic classes, and research suggests that the erosion of worker power has contributed to this class polarization in precarity. One dimension of precarious work of growing interest to scholars and policymakers is instability faced by workers in the amount and regularity of their work hours. However, we know little about the magnitude of month-to-month or week-to-week (intra-year) volatility in hours worked, the extent of class-based polarization in this measure of job quality, and whether worker power moderates this polarization. In this paper, we make novel use of the panel nature of the nationally-representative Current Population Survey (CPS) to estimate intra-year volatility in the actual hours respondents report working in the previous week across four consecutive survey months. Using this new measure, we then show that, net of demographic characteristics and controls for occupation and industry, low-wage workers experience disproportionately greater work hour volatility. Finally, we find evidence that reductions in marketplace bargaining power--as measured by higher state-level unemployment rates--increase wage- and education-based polarization in work hour volatility, while increases in associational power--as measured by union coverage--reduce wage-based polarization in work hour volatility.


Arbeit ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Scheele

AbstractDer Beschäftigungsanstieg in Deutschland in den letzten Jahren basiert zu einem großen Anteil auf der Basis von sog. atypischen Beschäftigungsverhältnissen, die häufig zugleich nur eine prekäre Erwerbsintegration ermöglichen. Insbesondere die Erwerbsmuster von Frauen weisen Brüche auf, die Ergebnis der geschlechtshierarchischen Arbeitsteilung sind. Ausgehend von einer knappen Skizze zurEntwicklungder Frauenerwerbstätigkeit und der geschlechtlichen Arbeitsteilung im Kontext der allgemeinen Zunahme atypischer Beschäftigung wirdargumentiert, dass der Prekarisierungsdiskurs hinsichtlich der Analyse von Arbeits- und Geschlechterverhältnissen nicht nur einige seitens der Geschlechterforschung kritisierte Leerstellen aufweist, sondern trotz seiner Erweiterung auf das „ganze Leben“ nur begrenzt Ansatzpunkte für eine geschlechterpolitisch erweiterte arbeits politische Agenda bietet. Viel versprechender - so die These - ist die Hinwendung zu einem normativen, „positiven“ Bezugspunkt für Arbeitspolitik und Arbeitsgestaltung, derausden politischen Initiativen zu „guter Arbeit“ entwickelt werden kann.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 527-541
Author(s):  
Tom Barnes ◽  
Sally A. Weller

Much of the large literature on precarious work has largely tended to assume that precarity is shaped by job quality: that precarious work leads to precarious lives. This paper adds to the literature by questioning this line of causality and highlighting the broader range of influences shaping the lives of older workers who enter precarious work after retrenchment from secure, long-term careers. Drawing on a study of Australia’s automotive manufacturing industry, which closed in 2017, this article finds that for older retrenched workers, exposure to precarious employment sharpened life precarity for some but did not lead to precarious lives for others. Instead of a uniform transition from security to precarity, these workers’ life trajectories diverged depending on their household-scale financial security. Key issues influencing the likelihood of older workers’ lives becoming precarious were enterprise benefits and asset wealth accumulated through their previous careers.


Social Forces ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 973-999
Author(s):  
Joe LaBriola ◽  
Daniel Schneider

Abstract Precarious work, which has become more prevalent in the United States in recent decades, is disproportionately experienced by workers of lower socio-economic classes, and research suggests that the erosion of worker power has contributed to this class polarization in precarity. One dimension of precarious work of growing interest to scholars and policymakers is instability faced by workers in the amount and regularity of their work hours. However, we know little about the magnitude of month-to-month or week-to-week (intra-year) volatility in hours worked, the extent of class-based polarization in this measure of job quality, and whether worker power moderates this polarization. In this paper, we make novel use of the panel nature of the nationally-representative Current Population Survey (CPS) to estimate intra-year volatility in the actual hours respondents report working in the previous week across four consecutive survey months. Using this new measure, we then show that, net of demographic characteristics and controls for occupation and industry, low-wage workers experience disproportionately greater work hour volatility. Finally, we find evidence that reductions in marketplace bargaining power—as measured by higher state-level unemployment rates—increase wage- and education-based polarization in work hour volatility, while increases in associational power—as measured by union coverage—reduce wage-based polarization in work hour volatility.


2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne L. Kalleberg
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard V. Adkisson ◽  
Eduardo Saucedo
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document