Challenges of Dental Hygienists in a Multidisciplinary Team Approach During Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Nationwide Study

2020 ◽  
pp. 104990912096070
Author(s):  
Nobuhisa Nakajima
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Oral Care ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Dental Hygienists ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Education ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team Approach ◽  
Palliative Care Education

Purpose: Palliative care is constructed by various kinds of professionals. This study aimed to identify the challenges that dental hygienists (DHs) encountered when working with other professionals in a multidisciplinary team approach in palliative care for advanced cancer patients. Methods: We conducted the following two studies: (1) a questionnaire-based survey for DHs who belong to Japanese Society for Oral Care (JSOC) on oral care in palliative care settings (n = 1,290), and (2) surveys on education for DHs in universities. Items in this study included the following: 1) a cross-sectional analysis of the curriculum on palliative care at 10 universities and 2) a questionnaire-based survey on palliative care education at 1 of the 10 universities (n = 75). Results: (1) Seventy-three percent had experience in oral care in palliative care settings. The number of DHs with ≥20 years’ experience was significantly higher than those with <10 years’ experience (76% vs 66%, p = 0.042). Further, 92% received no formal palliative care education, and 94% perceived a lack of knowledge on palliative care. These data did not differ based on the years of experience. (2) (a) There was no specific curriculum on the subject of palliative care in 10 universities. Lectures on palliative care were provided at 3 universities. (b) Fifty-five percent of students attended lectures on palliative care. However, 88% of them experienced anxiety, and 78% perceived few classes on palliative care. Conclusions: For DHs, to positively contribute to multidisciplinary palliative care team approach, it is important to establish pregraduate and postgraduate education systems.

Disagreements in surgical decision making for advanced cancer patients secondary to deficiencies in palliative care education.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 34-34
Author(s):  
Sarah Bateni ◽  
Robert J. Canter ◽  
Frederick J. Meyers ◽  
Joseph M Galante ◽  
Richard J. Bold
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Education ◽  
Palliative Care Education ◽  
Clinical Vignettes ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
Care Training

34 Background: Surgical decision making in advanced cancer patients requires careful thought and deliberation balancing the high risks with the potential palliative benefits. We sought to compare palliative care education and decision-making for palliative surgery among physicians who commonly treat advanced cancer patients. Methods: Practicing surgeons, medical oncologists, palliative care physicians and critical care intensivists from a large urban city and its surrounding areas were surveyed with a 32-item questionnaire consisting of a palliative care education survey and 4 clinical vignettes depicting patients with advanced cancer and symptomatic surgical conditions. Results: Of the 299 physicians surveyed, 102 responded with a response rate of 34.1%. Respondents reflected the demographics of the total cohort. Physicians reported minimal hours of palliative care education during residency (median 0, IQR 0-8), fellowship (median 0, IQR 0-20), and continuing medical education (CME, median 8, IQR 0-20). Surgeons reported the fewest hours of palliative care education during residency, fellowship, and CME combined (median 10, IQR 2-15) compared to medical oncologists (median 30, IQR 20-80) and intensivists (median 50, IQR 30-100), p < 0.05. 19.6% of surgeons reported receiving no palliative care education compared to none of the medical oncologists and 7.7% of intensivists. Analysis of physician treatment recommendations for the 4 clinical vignettes showed disagreement among physicians regardless of specialty. Absence of palliative care training was associated with recommending major surgical intervention more frequently compared to physicians with ≥40 hours of palliative care training (0.7 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.8, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Deficiencies in palliative care education persist and adversely impact quality of care. Recent national society recommendations for palliative care services are well founded given these deficiencies. Additionally, our findings highlight a sustained failure of the current postgraduate medical education system and the need for greater efforts system-wide in palliative care education across medical and surgical specialties.

HOPE. Home Care Outreach for Palliative Care Education.

1998 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
BR Ferrell ◽  
R Virani ◽  
M Grant
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Care Education ◽  
Palliative Care Education

scholarly journals Using a multidisciplinary approach to reveal decision-making capacity within acute care for an individual with aphasia

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 2050313X2110270
Author(s):  
Ruth Maxwell ◽  
Michelle O’Brien ◽  
Deirdre O’Donnell ◽  
Lauren Christophers ◽  
Thilo Kroll
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team Approach ◽  
Decision Making Capacity ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Functional Assessments ◽  
Health Nursing ◽  
Communication Approach

Formal assessments of cognition that rely on language may conceal the non-linguistic cognitive function of people with aphasia. This may have detrimental consequences for how people with aphasia are supported to reveal communicative and decision-making competence. This case report demonstrates a multidisciplinary team approach to supporting the health and social care decision-making of people with aphasia. The case is a 67-year-old woman with Wernicke’s type aphasia. As the issue of long-term care arose, the speech and language therapist used a supported communication approach with the patient who expressed her wish to go home. A multidisciplinary team functional assessment of capacity was undertaken which involved functional assessments and observations of everyday tasks by allied health, nursing, catering and medical staff. In this way, the patient’s decision-making capacity was revealed and she was discharged home. A collaborative multidisciplinary team approach using supported communication and functional capacity assessments may be essential for scaffolding the decision-making capacity of people with aphasia.

Palliative Referrals in Advanced Cancer Patients: Utilizing the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool and Rothman Index

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912110178
Author(s):  
Abigail Sy Chan ◽  
Amit Rout ◽  
Christopher R. D.’Adamo ◽  
Irina Lev ◽  
Amy Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Code Status ◽  
Palliative Care Needs

Background: Timely identification of palliative care needs can reduce hospitalizations and improve quality of life. The Supportive & Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) identifies patients with advanced medical conditions who may need special care planning. The Rothman Index (RI) detects patients at high risk of acutely decompensating in the inpatient setting. SPICT and RI among cancer patients were utilized in this study to evaluate their potential roles in palliative care referrals. Methods: Advanced cancer patients admitted to an institution in Baltimore, Maryland in 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, length of hospital stay (LOS), palliative care referrals, RI scores, and SPICT scores were obtained. Patients were divided into SPICT positive or negative and RI > 60 or RI < 60.Unpaired t-tests and chi-square tests were utilized to determine the associations between SPICT and RI and early palliative care needs and mortality. Results: 227 patients were included, with a mean age of 68 years, 63% Black, 59% female, with the majority having lung and GI malignancies. Sixty percent were SPICT +, 21% had RI < 60. SPICT + patients were more likely to have RI < 60 (p = 0.001). SPICT + and RI < 60 patients were more likely to have longer LOS, change in code status, more palliative/hospice referrals, and increased mortality (p <0.05). Conclusions: SPICT and RI are valuable tools in predicting mortality and palliative/hospice care referrals. These can also be utilized to initiate early palliative and goals of care discussions in patients with advanced cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document