The First Step to Initiate Pediatric Palliative Care: Identify Patient Needs and Cooperation of Medical Staff

Few Korean hospitals had experience in pediatric palliative care. Since the beginning of the national palliative care project, interest in pediatric palliative care has gradually increased, but the establishment of professional palliative care is still inadequate due to a lack of indicators. This study aimed to find considerations in the process of initiating palliative care services. The general and clinical characteristics of 181 patients aged less than 24 years who were registered at the pediatric palliative care center from January 2019 to August 2021 were evaluated. Life-limiting condition group 1 had the largest number of patients. The primary need for palliative care was psychological and emotional support, followed by information sharing and help in communication with the medical staff in decision-making processes. Seventy-two patients were technologically dependent, with one to four technical supports for each patient. The registration of patients with cancer increased with time, and the time from disease diagnosis to consultation for pediatric palliative care service was significantly reduced. In conclusion, before starting pediatric palliative care, it is necessary to understand the needs of patients and their families and to cooperate with medical staff.

Planning for Implementation Success of an Electronic Cross-Facility Health Record for Pediatric Palliative Care Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

Pediatric palliative care (PPC) patients require years of care across professions and sectors. Sharing treatment-related information and communicating among different PPC professionals is critical to ensure good quality of care. In Germany, this communication is mostly paper-based and prone to errors. Therefore, an electronic cross-facility health record (ECHR) was participatorily designed with users, wherein information can be shared and PPC professionals can communicate with each other. As this form of electronic health record differs from existing models in Germany, there is a need for successful implementation to ensure a positive impact. Therefore, the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of ECHR in PPC were examined. Using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR), transcripts of 32 interviews, 3 focus groups, and 20 think-aloud studies with PPC professionals were analyzed. CFIR indicated that the ECHR-design was viewed positively by users and can be a facilitator for implementation. Barriers exist, mainly due to the fact that the implementation is not planned, the use of the ECHR involves effort, costs are not covered, and all users must be motivated to use the ECHR for functionality. CFIR helps uncover the crux of the issues that need to be considered when planning ECHR implementation to improve care in PPC.

Care practices of specialized outpatient pediatric palliative care teams in collaboration with parents: Results of participatory observations

Background: Collaboration between parents and professional care providers is an essential part of pediatric palliative care. As children are embedded in family systems and many of the patients are not able to communicate verbally, their parents are the primary interaction partners for palliative care providers. International standards for pediatric palliative care in Europe state that parents should be supported, acknowledged as the primary carers and involved as partners in all care and decisions. Aim: To find out through which care practices pediatric palliative care teams shape collaboration with parents in everyday care. Design: Ethnographic method of participatory observations. Field notes were analyzed using thematic analysis. Setting/participants: Researchers accompanied three pediatric palliative care teams on home visits to eight different families caring for a child with life-limiting conditions. Results: Care practices of palliative care teams were characterized by familiarity, a resource-oriented attitude, empowerment of parents, shared decision-making and support for parents. Palliative care teams not only provided palliative medical treatment for the children, but also developed a trusting care partnership with parents. The teams employed a sensitive and multifaceted communication style in their collaboration with parents. Conclusions: Care practices in pediatric palliative care require time, communication skills, and a high level of psychosocial competence, to develop a trusting, collaborative relationship with parents. This should be taken into consideration when establishing pediatric palliative care structures, preparing guidelines, training staff, and deciding upon appropriate remuneration.

Trends in Pediatric Palliative Care Research (TPPCR) 2021; Issue #10: Commentary on Battista et al.

This TPPCR commentary discusses the 2021 paper by Battista et al, “Advance Directives for Adolescents and Young Adults Living with Neuromuscular Disease: An Integrative Review of the Literature.” published in Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing.

Challenges in the Provision of Pediatric Palliative Care in Mexico: A Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey

Objective: An enormous need for pediatric palliative care (PPC) has been reported, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, the access to PPC is limited. This study identifies the current challenges in the provision of PPC and their severity from the perspective of healthcare professionals. Method: We conducted a web-based descriptive cross-sectional survey among healthcare professionals treating children in need of palliative care in Mexico in 2019. We used convenience sampling and snowball sampling to acquire participants. Results: Seventy healthcare professionals from Mexico participated. Participants were 64.3% female, on average 45.8 (SD = 10.9) years old, had an average of 15.84 (SD = 10.4) years of work experience and worked in 15 states. The three most severe barriers reported were: (1) Few teams and/or networks of out-of-hospital/domestic support; (2) Absence of training centres and continuing medical/paramedical education in PPC; and (3) Lack of legal, labor, and economic protection for parents who must stop working to be with their children. The barriers related to a lack of awareness and commitment, a lack of support, legal factors, and working conditions were rated highest. Participants considered increased awareness and better knowledge of PPC for all as the top priority, and particularly emphasized the need for better education and training of health professionals. Conclusion: We have identified several barriers to successful palliative care (PC) provision for children. Primarily, these are lack of awareness and commitment, especially of the health authorities and the medical professions, lack of personal and financial support, legal factors, and working conditions. The need to change and improve care exists at the policy level, the health professional level, and the public societal level.

Trisomy 18 – When the Diagnosis Is Compatible With Life

Trisomy 18 is an autosomal chromosomal disorder characterized by the presence of an extra 18 chromosome. In the last decades, and as the therapeutic options have become more relevant, the medical community witnessed a paradigm shift on the offer of treatment to these children.This is a retrospective, cohort study that strives to characterize the clinical path and survival of the children with the diagnosis of trisomy 18, accompanied in a tertiary pediatric hospital between 1995 and 2020.Six children were identified with trisomy 18, two of them mosaic (33,3%) and four were females (66,7%). All had cardiovascular, cognitive and physical development anomalies or minor congenital anomalies (n=6, 100%) and most presented musculoskeletal anomalies (n=5, 83,3%) and feeding difficulties (n=4, 66,7%). Four children (66,7%) were reliant on devices or equipment and all needed chronic medication (n=6, 100%). Two children (33,3%) were submitted to surgical interventions. Four children (66,7%) were hospitalized in the last year of life. A decision of limitation of therapeutic effort was present in three cases (50%) with one child being referenced to pediatric palliative care (16,7%). One-month, one-year and ten-year survival were 66,7% (n=4), 33,3% (n=2, both mosaic), and 16,7% (n=1, mosaic) respectively.Conclusions: Knowledge on the clinical picture is of great importance regarding the neonatal care and the decisions about invasive treatments, which can involve ethical issues, highlighting, concurrently, the need for attempted referral of these children to pediatric palliative care teams.