Cognitive Differentiation and Organizational Influence Tactics: Findings and Implications for Leaders as Agents of Influence

1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 152-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.B. Crawford ◽  
C. Sue Strohkirch

This paper examines the relationships between cognitive differentiation and three different methods of influence. A brief summary of cognitive differentiation examined the historical formulation, the organizational applications, and the measures and methods involved. Similarly, a review of organizational influence summarizes the important of influence as well as the organizational and leadership applications of influence. Subjects (N=238) completed copies of the Role Category Questionnaire and the Assessment of Influence Behaviors. Findings suggest that people more cognitively differentiated used more charismatic and team influence, but no more reward/punishment/manipulation influence than did less differentiated subjects. Specific conclusions and implications for leadership addressed.

2000 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Blickle

It was the purpose of this research to analyze the factorial and construct validity of the Profile of Organizational Influence Strategies, Form M of Kipnis and Schmidt, which assesses attempts to influence a manager and also attempts when the manager has resisted doing what the employee wants. 254 German employees from various organizations participated. The Profile of Organizational Influence Strategies and the Blickle Inventory assessed upward influencing strategies over 2 wk. Data were analyzed with confirmatory factor analyses in a multitrait-multimethod design. All items loaded significantly on the expected factors. The results support the factorial and convergent validity of the subscales In addition, the data show that initial attempts to influence and attempts after resistance should be assessed separately.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document