Performance of variable friction pendulum system for torsionally coupled structures

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay R Panchal ◽  
Radhey S Jangid
Author(s):  
Darshak Patel ◽  
V. R. Panchal ◽  
Maulik Patel

In this study, building-equipment system with Modified Variable Friction Pendulum System (MVFPS) is investigated under different earthquake ground excitations. Earthquake response of building-equipment system isolated with MVFPS is compared with Variable Friction Pendulum System (VFPS) and Friction Pendulum System (FPS) in order to find efficiency of MVFPS. Newmark’s linear acceleration method is used for solving governing equation of motion for building-equipment system. In this investigation, different storey buildings are considered. It is observed that MVFPS is more efficient in reducing the recoverable energy than FPS, but less efficient than VFPS. From the comparative study, it is found that FPS shows robust performance in comparison to MVFPS and VFPS in reducing equipment acceleration and displacement.


2006 ◽  
Vol 35 (13) ◽  
pp. 1653-1675 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. S. Tsai ◽  
Wen-Shin Chen ◽  
Tsu-Cheng Chiang ◽  
Bo-Jen Chen

2018 ◽  
Vol 195 ◽  
pp. 02013
Author(s):  
Santi Nuraini ◽  
Asdam Tambusay ◽  
Priyo Suprobo

Advanced nonlinear analysis in light rail transit (LRT) structures has been undertaken to examine the influence of seismic isolation devices for reducing seismic demand. The study employed the use of two types of commercially available bearings, namely lead rubber bearing (LRB) and friction pendulum system (FPS). Six LRT structures, designed to be built in Surabaya, were modelled using computer-aided software SAP2000, where each of the three structures consisted of three types of LRB and FPS placed onto the pier cap to support the horizontal upper-structural member. Nonlinear static pushover and dynamic time history analysis with seven improved ground motion data was performed to gain improved insights on the behavioural response of LRT structures, allowing one to fully understand the supremacy of seismic isolations for protecting the structure against seismic actions. It is shown that both devices manage to isolate seismic forces, resulting in alleviation of excessive base shear occurring at the column. In addition, it is noticeable that the overall responses of LRB and FPS shows marginal discrepancies, suggesting both devices are interchangeable to be used for LRT-like structures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document