Program Evaluation for a Jail-Based Mental Health Treatment Program

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-231
Author(s):  
Gina M. Hagar ◽  
Timothy E. Ludwig ◽  
Katharine McGovern
2021 ◽  
pp. 299-304
Author(s):  
Edward Shorter

The Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP), which featured atypical antipsychotics, was considered more of a commercial scam than science. TMAP had its beginning in 1995, when it was granted $1.7 million by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and various officials and academics in Texas to develop a model mental health treatment program for incorporation into public mental health and prison systems. The Foundation was related to the Johnson & Johnson company, and what they funded was a “guidelines” project for schizophrenia. The TMAP subverted scientific integrity; it appeared to be a purely scientific venture when it was actually a marketing venture for Risperdal. The guidelines produced by TMAP became the basis for the TMAP algorithms, giving a market edge to the J&J products in Texas.


10.2196/10415 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e10415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ada Ng ◽  
Madhu Reddy ◽  
Alyson K Zalta ◽  
Stephen M Schueller

Background The increase in availability of patient data through consumer health wearable devices and mobile phone sensors provides opportunities for mental health treatment beyond traditional self-report measurements. Previous studies have suggested that wearables can be effectively used to benefit the physical health of people with mental health issues, but little research has explored the integration of wearable devices into mental health care. As such, early research is still necessary to address factors that might impact integration including patients' motivations to use wearables and their subsequent data. Objective The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of patients’ motivations to use or not to use wearables devices during an intensive treatment program for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). During this treatment, they received a complementary Fitbit. We investigated the following research questions: How did the veterans in the intensive treatment program use their Fitbit? What are contributing motivators for the use and nonuse of the Fitbit? Methods We conducted semistructured interviews with 13 veterans who completed an intensive treatment program for PTSD. We transcribed and analyzed interviews using thematic analysis. Results We identified three major motivations for veterans to use the Fitbit during their time in the program: increase self-awareness, support social interactions, and give back to other veterans. We also identified three major reasons certain features of the Fitbit were not used: lack of clarity around the purpose of the Fitbit, lack of meaning in the Fitbit data, and challenges in the veteran-provider relationship. Conclusions To integrate wearable data into mental health treatment programs, it is important to understand the patient’s perspectives and motivations in using wearables. We also discuss how the military culture and PTSD may have contributed to our participants' behaviors and attitudes toward Fitbit usage. We conclude with possible approaches for integrating patient-generated data into mental health treatment settings that may address the challenges we identified.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley B. Batastini ◽  
Robert D. Morgan ◽  
Daryl G. Kroner ◽  
Jeremy F. Mills

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ada Ng ◽  
Madhu Reddy ◽  
Alyson K Zalta ◽  
Stephen M Schueller

BACKGROUND The increase in availability of patient data through consumer health wearable devices and mobile phone sensors provides opportunities for mental health treatment beyond traditional self-report measurements. Previous studies have suggested that wearables can be effectively used to benefit the physical health of people with mental health issues, but little research has explored the integration of wearable devices into mental health care. As such, early research is still necessary to address factors that might impact integration including patients' motivations to use wearables and their subsequent data. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of patients’ motivations to use or not to use wearables devices during an intensive treatment program for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). During this treatment, they received a complementary Fitbit. We investigated the following research questions: How did the veterans in the intensive treatment program use their Fitbit? What are contributing motivators for the use and nonuse of the Fitbit? METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with 13 veterans who completed an intensive treatment program for PTSD. We transcribed and analyzed interviews using thematic analysis. RESULTS We identified three major motivations for veterans to use the Fitbit during their time in the program: increase self-awareness, support social interactions, and give back to other veterans. We also identified three major reasons certain features of the Fitbit were not used: lack of clarity around the purpose of the Fitbit, lack of meaning in the Fitbit data, and challenges in the veteran-provider relationship. CONCLUSIONS To integrate wearable data into mental health treatment programs, it is important to understand the patient’s perspectives and motivations in using wearables. We also discuss how the military culture and PTSD may have contributed to our participants' behaviors and attitudes toward Fitbit usage. We conclude with possible approaches for integrating patient-generated data into mental health treatment settings that may address the challenges we identified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document