Professional Writing and the Humanities

ABCA Bulletin ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 6-7
Author(s):  
Donald R. Dickson
Keyword(s):  
1971 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-341
Author(s):  
James R. Vitelli

Whether engineering students should be taught English and the communication skills in separate classes is a problem that has plagued teachers for many years. The author thinks that no distinction should be made between English for engineers and English for other students. The Kitzhaber Report is cited as an argument for anti-separatism and is set off against the views of the separatists. More specific statements are examined through the evaluation of a currently used anthology of technical and professional writing.


1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Rehling

Recent studies identify gendered differences in communication and collaboration styles which suggest consequences for professional writing classrooms. If, indeed, men tend to stereotype women as clerks, prefer hierarchical collaboration, and value product over process, and, too, if gendered differences tend to increase counterproductive dissent, then the gender balance of writing groups might affect their dominant styles in those respects. However, when I analyzed the behaviors of over sixty student groups in my professional writing classes, I did not find gender balancing to have such effects. Instead, however, I observed other gender-related effects on collaboration: tendencies to stereotype men as technical experts and to self-segregate into gendered working teams. These findings suggest new perspectives on the role of gender for collaborative groups in professional writing classrooms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document