Pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade for primary and secondary macular hole closure: Is it still a useful procedure?

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 503-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janusz Pieczynski ◽  
Patrycja Kuklo ◽  
Andrzej Grzybowski
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Hole ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Gas Tamponade ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
Silicone Oil Tamponade ◽  
Hole Closure

Purpose: To evaluate usefulness of posterior vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade for primary and secondary macular hole closure. Methods: We searched for publications on the surgical treatment of full-thickness idiopathic and recurrent macular hole. We divided reports into two groups: primary macular hole repair and recurrent macular hole repair with silicone oil tamponade. Results: In primary macular hole treatment, different authors confirmed effectiveness of silicone oil tamponade. They suggest that the most important factor for successful outcome was completeness of vitreous cavity filling with oil. Complications after this method were comparable to those after gas tamponade. However, even if good anatomical results are achieved in secondary macular hole closure, visual acuity is sometimes less rewarding. Conclusion: There are reports on good efficacy of silicone oil tamponade for primary and recurrent macular hole closure. Anatomical closure and visual acuity rates in pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil and with gas filling are comparable. Gas tamponade seems to be safer and needs no more surgery. Postoperative complications in both methods are similar, but all patients with silicone oil filling need to undergo a reoperation to have the silicone removed. There are also other surgical techniques for primary macular hole closure as well as for unsuccessful primary macular hole procedures. We think that primary macular hole closure should be performed with gas tamponade, supported with different adjuvants, as a method of choice. Silicone oil tamponade could be still an alternative in cases, when there are no more efficient techniques or possibilities to treat with success recurrent macular hole.

scholarly journals Posterior pole retinotomy for treatment of recurrent macular hole retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes: a pilot study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianggui Wang ◽  
Xuezhi Zhou ◽  
Ying Zhu ◽  
Huizhuo Xu
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Detachment ◽  
Macular Hole ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
Posterior Pole ◽  
Macular Holes ◽  
Macular Hole Retinal Detachment ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
Silicone Oil Tamponade ◽  
Hole Closure

Abstract Background To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of posterior pole retinotomy to treat recurrent macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) in highly myopic patients. Methods We performed a retrospective study and reviewed the medical records in our hospital between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018. Highly myopic patients who received posterior pole retinotomy with silicone oil tamponade for their recurrent MHRD after pars plana vitrectomy were included in the analysis. Postoperative retinal reattachment, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), macular hole closure, and complications were evaluated. Results There were 11 patients (11 eyes) included in this study. All retinas were reattached. Silicone oil was successfully removed from all eyes 1.5–3 months after the surgery. Macular holes were completely closed in three eyes and remained flat open in eight eyes. The BCVA of all eyes improved significantly at 12 months after surgery (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution, pre vs. postoperatively, 1.87 ± 0.44 vs. 1.15 ± 0.24, P < 0.05). None of the patients had complications such as endophthalmitis, fundus hemorrhage, retinal redetachment, and proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Conclusion Posterior pole retinotomy is a safe and effective surgery to treat recurrent MHRD after pars plana vitrectomy in highly myopic patients.

scholarly journals A Female Case of X-Linked Retinoschisis with Macular Hole Bilaterally

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
A. Altun
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Hole ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
Surgical Experience ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes ◽  
Female Case ◽  
Pars Plana

Purpose. We aimed at reminding that X-linked retinoschisis may also be seen in female patients and share our vitreoretinal surgical experience. Methods. The patient underwent pars plana vitrectomy including the closure of the macular holes with inverted ILM flap technique bilaterally. Lens extractions were performed by phacoemulsification during the removal of silicone oil endotamponade. Patient. An 18-year-old girl with X-linked retinoschisis and large macular holes in both eyes presented to the clinic of ophthalmology. It was confirmed that the patient had RS1 mutation Results. Nine-month-follow-up was uneventful for retinal findings. Significant improvement in visual acuity was achieved, and macular holes were remained closed. Conclusion. In cases with large macular holes due to XLR, an inverted ILM flap technique might be safe and effective. Four-month-silicone-endotamponade might be sufficient.

Surgical Macular Hole Closure Without a Gas Tamponade

2021 ◽  
pp. 247412642110189
Author(s):  
Scott Grant ◽  
Sean D. Adrean
Keyword(s):  
Macular Hole ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Gas Bubble ◽  
Hole Size ◽  
Gas Tamponade ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
Visual Results ◽  
Hole Closure

Purpose: This work aims to evaluate the outcomes of a series of macular hole (MH) surgical procedures in patients who had pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel and without gas tamponade. Methods: Patients from a retina specialty clinic who had MHs were identified for this interventional case series. Patients with small MHs were offered inclusion into the trial. Patients with larger MHs were excluded. They underwent standard 3-port PPV and ILM peel without gas or air to treat small MHs. The main outcomes that we measured were closure of MH and visual results. Results: Small MHs in 5 patients were managed with PPV and ILM peel alone. The average preoperative hole size at its narrowest width was 227 µm (range, 173-294 µm). Four of 5 patients (80%) had successful hole closure without a gas tamponade and improved vision; 1 patient did not have hole closure and was treated with an in-office gas bubble to close the hole. The average preoperative vision at 3 months was 20/80– (54 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) and improved to 20/30–2 (73 ETDRS letters) in the 4 patients whose MHs were closed with surgery without a gas bubble. This was statistically significant ( P = .003). The hole that did not close initially without gas tamponade was the largest in the series. Conclusions: Patients with small MHs can be successfully treated with a vitrectomy and ILM peel alone without a gas tamponade.

scholarly journals A Combination of Surgical Techniques to Repair a Giant Traumatic Macular Hole

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Soon Wai Ch’ng ◽  
Ibrahim Elaraoud ◽  
David Karl ◽  
Dimitrios Kalogeropoulos ◽  
Rynn Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Hole ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
The Past ◽  
Full Thickness Macular Hole ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
Silicone Oil Tamponade

A 38-year-old man with a traumatic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) presented to our eye casualty department with a sudden deterioration of his right eye vision to hand movements over the past one week. The suspected traumatic FTMH was present since he was 13 years old from a direct impact of a golf ball in his right eye and his best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) has always remained at 1/60 Snellen vision. On examination, he had a very large FTMH measuring 1635 µm with central foveal retinal detachment. Pars plana vitrectomy combined with large inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel flap, 5000 Cs silicone oil tamponade, and autologous platelets implantation was performed. Follow-up visits revealed that the FTMH was closed under silicone oil. The silicone oil was removed six months after the surgery and the FTMH remained close with the retina remaining attached. His BCVA was restored to his previous baseline level of 1/60 Snellen vision. With the advent of multiple techniques to repair FTMH such as the ILM flaps, we have combined this technique with older proven techniques such as silicone oil tamponade and autologous platelets implantation to close the giant traumatic FTMH. This case study demonstrates that combining techniques can help close a FMTH that is otherwise deemed impossible in the past.

Outcome of autologous platelet concentrate and gas tamponade compared to heavy silicone oil tamponade in persistent macular hole surgery

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212090370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friederike Schaub ◽  
Nasir Gözlügöl ◽  
Corinna von Goscinski ◽  
Philip Enders ◽  
Ludwig M Heindl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Hole ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Sulfur Hexafluoride ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
Platelet Concentrate ◽  
Heavy Silicone Oil ◽  
Autologous Platelet Concentrate ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
Autologous Platelet ◽  
Hole Closure

Purpose: Persistence represents the major reason for failure of primary macular hole repair. A variety of surgical approaches are available for treating persistent macular holes. To compare clinical outcome of re-pars plana vitrectomy combined with autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% gas tamponade with heavy silicone oil in persistent macular hole. Methods: Records of 48 consecutive eyes with persistent macular holes which underwent re-pars plana vitrectomy with either heavy silicone oil (35 eyes, persistent macular–hole minimum linear diameter: 518.8 ± 171.1 µm) or autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% (13 eyes, persistent macular hole–minimum linear diameter: 454.1 ± 211.3 µm) were reviewed retrospectively. All patients underwent measurements of anatomical persistent macular hole characteristics evaluated by optical coherence tomography and visual function. Cases in which anatomical success failed after first re-pars plana vitrectomy were treated with the other surgical techniques, comparable to a cross-over design. Results: Persistent macular hole closure rate was 57.1% with autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% and 45.7% with heavy silicone oil ( p = 0.102). Functional results were comparable when persistent macular hole closure was achieved ( p ⩾ 0.741), but significantly better for the autologous platelet concentrate with sulfur hexafluoride 20% group when persistent macular hole closure failed ( p = 0.019). Conclusion: Re-pars plana vitrectomy combined with autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% seems to achieve at least non-inferior persistent macular hole closure rates and comparable functional results when compared to heavy silicone oil, suggesting autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% as a safe surgical alternative in persistent macular hole. Especially when persistent macular hole closure failed, autologous platelet concentrate with sulfur hexafluoride 20% seems to be superior regarding visual outcome.

Management of a case of Enhanced S-cone syndrome with massive foveoschisis treated with pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Lorane Bechet ◽  
Raphaël Atia ◽  
Christina Zeitz ◽  
Saddek Mohand-Saïd ◽  
José-Alain Sahel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
Silicone Oil Tamponade ◽  
Enhanced S Cone Syndrome
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document