Reviews and Notes of Books : THE FUTURE POPULATION OF EUROPE AND THE SOVIET UNION : POPULATION PROJECTIONS, I940- I970, by Frank W. Notestein, Irene B. Taeuber, Dudley Kirk, Ansley J. Coale and Louise K. Kiser, of the Office of Population Research, Princetown University. 3I6 pp., Medium 8vo. League of Nations. Geneva, I944

1945 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-294
Keyword(s):  
Soviet Union ◽  
League Of Nations ◽  
Population Projections ◽  
Population Research ◽  
The Soviet Union ◽  
The Future ◽  
Future Population

The Future Population of Europe and the Soviet Union: Population Projections 1940-1970.

1945 ◽  
Vol 40 (230) ◽  
pp. 265
Author(s):  
Dorothy S. Thomas ◽  
Frank W. Notestein ◽  
Irene B. Taeuber ◽  
Dudley Kirk ◽  
Ansley J. Coale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soviet Union ◽  
Population Projections ◽  
The Soviet Union ◽  
The Future ◽  
Future Population

The Future Population of Europe and the Soviet Union

1944 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 318
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Spengler ◽  
Frank W. Notestein ◽  
Irene B. Taeuber ◽  
Dudley Kirk ◽  
Ansley J. Coale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soviet Union ◽  
The Soviet Union ◽  
The Future ◽  
Future Population

The Old and the New League: The Covenant and the dumbarton Oaks Proposals

1945 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Kelsen
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Soviet Union ◽  
The United States ◽  
League Of Nations ◽  
International Organization ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Soviet Union ◽  
The Future

The result of the conversations between the delegations of the United States, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and China at Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, in the Autumn of 1944, is not a Charter for the international organization to be established after the war. It is only Proposals for such a Charter; these Proposals are, moreover, as Secretary of State Cordell Hull pointed out, neither complete nor final. They do not concern all subject matters to be regulated by the future Charter and do not present precise formulations of legal rules to be binding upon contracting parties. This work still remains to be done. Hence it may seem to be premature to compare the Dumbarton Oaks Proposals with the Covenant of the League of Nations. Such a comparison cannot do justice to the achievements at Dumbarton Oaks; it is justifiable only as an attempt to contribute some suggestions for the great task of drafting the definitive text of the future charter; it must not be taken as a conclusive criticism.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document