scholarly journals Fast MCsquare-Based Independent Dose Verification Platform for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382110330
Author(s):  
Chunbo Liu ◽  
Meng Wei Ho ◽  
Jiyeon Park ◽  
Wen Chien Hsi ◽  
Xiaoying Liang ◽  
...  

Purpose: To commission MCsquare (a multi-cores CPU-based dose calculation engine) for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy, integrate it into RayStation treatment plan system (TPS) to create a dedicated platform for fast independent dose verification. Method: A MCsquare-based independent dose verification platform (MC2InRS) was developed to realize automatic dose re-calculation for clinical use, including data preparation, dose calculation, 2D/3D gamma analysis. MCsquare was commissioned based on in-air lateral dose profiles, integrated depth dose, and the absolute dose of different beam energies for Proteus®ONE. MC2InRS was validated with measurement data using various targets and depths in a water phantom. This study also investigated 15 clinical cases to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of MC2InRS platform in clinic practice. Results: Between simulation and measurement, the distal range differences at 80% (R80) and 20% (R20) dose levels for each energy were below 0.05 mm, and 0.1 mm, respectively, and the absolute dose differences were below 0.5%. 29 out of 36 QA planes reached a 100% gamma passing rate (GPR) for 2%/2mm criteria, and a minimum of 98.3% gamma was obtained in water phantom between simulation and measurement. For the 15 clinical cases investigated, the average 2D GPR (2%/2mm) was 95.4%, 99.3% for MCsquare vs. measurement, MCsquare vs. TPS, respectively. The average 3D GPR (2%/2mm) was 98.9%, 95.3% for MCsquare vs. TPS in water, and computed tomography (CT), respectively. Conclusion: MC2InRS, a fast, independent dose verification platform, has been developed to perform dose verification with high accuracy and efficiency for Pencil Bream Scanning (PBS). Its potential to be applied in routine clinical practice has also been discussed.

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina Pfeiler ◽  
Christian Bäumer ◽  
Erik Engwall ◽  
Dirk Geismar ◽  
Bernhard Spaan ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (6Part18) ◽  
pp. 323-323
Author(s):  
D Giantsoudi ◽  
B Clasie ◽  
C Grassberger ◽  
S Dowdell ◽  
N Depauw ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (16) ◽  
pp. 165005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Dolde ◽  
Patrick Naumann ◽  
Christian Dávid ◽  
Regula Gnirs ◽  
Marc Kachelrieß ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 190-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Moteabbed ◽  
Torunn I. Yock ◽  
Nicolas Depauw ◽  
Thomas M. Madden ◽  
Hanne M. Kooy ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (14) ◽  
pp. 145016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lamberto Widesott ◽  
Stefano Lorentini ◽  
Francesco Fracchiolla ◽  
Paolo Farace ◽  
Marco Schwarz

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konrad P. Nesteruk ◽  
Michele Togno ◽  
Martin Grossmann ◽  
Anthony J. Lomax ◽  
Damien C. Weber ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 82 ◽  
pp. 134-143
Author(s):  
M. De Saint-Hubert ◽  
C. De Angelis ◽  
Ž. Knežević ◽  
B. Michalec ◽  
B. Reniers ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document