Open Aneurysm Repair in Elderly Patients Not Candidates for Endovascular Repair (EVAR): Comparison with Patients Undergoing EVAR or Preferential Open Repair

2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Manis ◽  
Martin Feuerman ◽  
George L. Hines
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair versus Open Repair in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Ben Pearce ◽  
Tze-Woei Tan ◽  
Wayne W. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Study Intervention ◽  
Complications And Mortality

This chapter provides a summary of the landmark EVAR Trial 1, which compared endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with open repair in patients judged to be fit for both open and endovascular repair. Although endovascular AAA (EVAR) repair was associated with lower perioperative complications and mortality than open surgical repair, after 4 years of follow-up the outcomes of the two approaches were similar. Follow-up at 15 years found EVAR had inferior late survival, necessitating lifelong surveillance of EVAR and reintervention if necessary. The chapter describes the basics of the study, including funding, year study began, year study was published, study location, who was studied, who was excluded, how many patients, study design, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, gives a summary and discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.

Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Repair as an Outpatient

Vascular ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 210-212
Author(s):  
Dipankar Mukherjee ◽  
Tony Tallant
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Popliteal Artery ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Open Resection ◽  
Popliteal Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

With the advent of endovascular repair of aneurysmal disease, length of hospital stay is becoming shorter. Inherent morbidity and problems associated with open repair have been minimized, leading to an improved patient experience. We describe a fairly typical patient with a popliteal artery aneurysm who would be expected to have a protracted recovery from open resection but instead underwent endovascular repair as an outpatient.

Open vs. endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: tale of the tape

2020 ◽  
pp. 021849232094907
Author(s):  
Davut Çekmecelioglu ◽  
Vicente Orozco-Sevilla ◽  
Joseph S Coselli
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Open surgical repair persists as the gold-standard operation for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm; however, endovascular repair has become commonplace. Technical considerations in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm treatment are particularly complex, insofar as it involves critical branching arteries feeding the visceral organs. Newer, low-profile devices make total endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair more feasible and, thus, appealing. For younger and low-risk patients, the choice between open and endovascular therapy remains controversial. Despite the advantages of a minimally invasive procedure, data suggest that endovascular aortic repair incurs a greater risk of spinal cord deficit, and the durability of endovascular aortic repair remains unclear. It is difficult to compare outcomes between endovascular and open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, primarily because of the current investigational status of endovascular devices, the variety of approaches to endovascular repair, differing patient populations, lack of prospective randomized studies, and minimal medium- and long-tern follow-up data on endovascular repair. When deciding between open and endovascular approaches, one should consider which is more suitable for each patient. Older patients generally benefit from a less invasive approach. Open repair should be considered for young patients and those with heritable thoracic aortic disease. Infection and fistulae are best treated by open repair, although endovascular intervention as a lifesaving bridge to definitive repair has evolved to become a critical component of initial treatment. It is crucial to have technical expertise in both open and endovascular procedures to provide the best aortic repair for the patient. This may require dedicated aortic programs at tertiary institutions.

Experience With Unfavorable Iliac Access When Performing Fenestrated/Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282199112
Author(s):  
Adrien Hertault ◽  
Aurélia Bianchini ◽  
Guillaume Daniel ◽  
Teresa Martin-Gonzalez ◽  
Birgit Sweet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Iliac Artery ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Multiorgan Failure ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Small Diameter ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Purpose: To review a single-center experience with fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (f/bEVAR) in patients with challenging iliac anatomies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of the department’s database identified 398 consecutive patients who underwent complex endovascular repair f/bEVAR between January 2010 and June 2018; of these, 67 had challenging accesses. The strategies implemented to overcome access issues were reviewed, using a dedicated scoring system to evaluate the access (integrating diameter, tortuosity, calcification, and previous open or endovascular repair). Results: In this subgroup of patients, the most common graft design was a 4-vessel fenestrated endograft (27, 40.3%). Hostile access was due to small diameter (<7 mm) in 25 patients (37.3%) and/or concentric calcifications in 19 patients (26.9%). Mean iliac diameter was 5.5±2.6 mm on the right side and 6.0±2.5 mm on the left side. Previous open or endovascular aortoiliac repair had been performed in 15 patients (22.4%), and 20 patients (29.9%) had a stent previously implanted in at least 1 iliac artery, resulting in the inability to perform standard fenestrated repair with access from both sides. Five patients (7.5%) had a single patent iliac access. Eight distinctive strategies were identified to overcome these access issues, including the use of preloaded renal catheters in the endograft delivery system, angioplasty, graft modification (branches instead of fenestrations or 4 preloaded fenestrations), a conduit via a retroperitoneal approach, iliac artery recanalization, and/or the multiple puncture technique. Technical success was achieved in 62 cases (92.5%). Four patients had access complications and 1 died in the early postoperative period of multiorgan failure. Median follow-up was 24.6 months (IQR 7.2, 41.3). Clinical success at the end of follow-up was achieved in 57 patients (85.1%). During follow-up, 14 patients died, including 4 from an aorta-related cause. Conclusion: Dedicated strategies can be implemented to overcome hostile iliac access in patients with complex aneurysms when f/bEVAR is required. Typically, these maneuvers are associated with favorable outcomes.

Visceral segment aortic thrombus is associated with proximal aortic degeneration after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110212
Author(s):  
Sean P Steenberge ◽  
Daniel G Clair ◽  
Matthew J Eagleton ◽  
Francis J Caputo ◽  
Christopher J Smolock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aortic Thrombus ◽  
Aneurysm Development ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Objective To identify predictors of aortic aneurysm formation at or above an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Methods A total of 881 infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs were identified at a single institution from 2004 to 2008; 187 of the repairs were identified that had pre-operative and post-operative computed tomography imaging at least one year or greater to evaluate for aortic degeneration following repair. Aortic diameters at the celiac, superior mesenteric, and renal arteries were measured on all available computed tomographic scans. Aortic thrombus and calcification volumes in the visceral and infrarenal abdominal aortic segments were calculated. Multivariable modeling was used with log transformed variables to determine potential predictors of future aortic aneurysm development after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Results Of the 187 patients in the cohort, 100 had an open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair while 87 were treated with endovascular repair. Proximal aortic aneurysms developed in 26% ( n = 49) of the cohort during an average of 72 ± 34.2 months of follow-up. After multivariable modeling, visceral segment aortic thrombus on pre-operative computed tomography imaging increased the risk of aortic aneurysm development above the infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair within both the open abdominal aortic aneurysm (hazard ratio 2.04, p = 0.033) and endovascular repair (hazard ratio 3.31, p = 0.004) cohorts. Endovascular repair was independently associated with a higher risk of future aortic aneurysm development after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair when compared to open abdominal aortic aneurysm (hazard ratio 2.19, p = 0.025). Conclusions Visceral aortic thrombus present prior to abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and endovascular repair are both associated with an increased risk of future proximal aortic degeneration after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. These factors may predict patients at higher risk of developing proximal aortic aneurysms that may require complex aortic repairs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document