Five-Year Outcomes After Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: A Single Center Experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 155698452110314
Author(s):  
Roos de Jong ◽  
Kirolos Jacob ◽  
Alireza Jalali ◽  
Yehia Moharrem ◽  
Marc Buijsrogge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Complete Revascularization ◽  
Stent Patency ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Objective Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) combines both surgical and percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures. It offers a minimally invasive strategy for multivessel coronary artery disease and combines the advantages of both. However, quantitative long-term patency and clinical outcomes remain understudied. The objective of this study was to assess clinical outcomes and graft and stent patency at 5-year follow-up. Methods From January 2004 to January 2015, 120 patients were enrolled in this study. They underwent robotically assisted minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting of left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to the left descending artery (LAD) and percutaneous coronary intervention of non-LAD vessels. Primary outcome was graft (LITA-LAD) patency determined at 5 years of follow-up, assessed by computed tomography angiography and rest and stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS-MIBI). Secondary outcomes were stent patency and major adverse major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Also, freedom from recurrence of angina was assessed. Results At follow-up, 18 of 120 patients (15%) had died (in 5 patients the cause of death was cardiovascular). Among survivors, follow-up was achieved in 83 of 102 (81%). In 76 of 83 patients (92%) there was a patent LITA-LAD graft and in 75 of 83 (90%) a patent stent was demonstrated. MACCE occurred in 36 of 120 patients (30%). Freedom from recurrence of angina occurred in 92 of 120 patients (77%). Conclusions HCR is a safe and a promising procedure. It provides a minimally invasive approach and results in complete revascularization with good 5-year patency and clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention using bioresorbable vascular scaffold and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for left anterior descending artery disease: 3-year clinical outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4S) ◽  
pp. 6-14
Author(s):  
K. M. Vakkosov ◽  
V. I. Ganjukov
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Vascular Scaffold

Aim. Evaluates 3-year clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) versus minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery for the treatment of left anterior descending (LAD) lesions.Methods. In this single-center study were included 130 patients with stable angina and significant (≥70%) LAD disease. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to PCI with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb) (n = 65) or MIDCAB (n = 65). The primary end-point was major adverse cerebrocardiovascular events (MACCE) and secondary was. Primary and secondary endpoints were, respectively, major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events (MACCE) and target vessel failure at 3-year.Results.The groups of patients were comparable for all baseline demographic, clinical and angiographic parameters. The primary composite endpoint of MACCE through 3 years occurred in 16.9% of BVS patients and 9.2% of MIDCAB patients (p = 0.19). But 3-year any revascularization rates were higher with BVS (13.8% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.027). TVF was favor of the MIDCAB group (12,3% vs. 3,1%, p = 0.04), mainly triggered by high subsequent need for revascularization of the targeted vessel in the BVS group (9.2% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.05).Conclusion. At 3-year follow-up, PCI by BVS and MIDCAB in in patients with isolated LAD lesions yielded similar long-term outcomes regarding the primary composite clinical endpoint. The bioresorbable scaffold was associated with a higher incidence of reinterventions, TVF and TVR than the MIDCAB through 3 years of follow-up.

Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass in High-Risk Patients with Multivessel Disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grischa Hoffmann ◽  
Christine Friedrich ◽  
Katharina Huenges ◽  
Rainer Petzina ◽  
Astrid-Mareike Vogt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Multivessel Disease ◽  
Complete Revascularization ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Background High-risk patients with multivessel disease (MVD) including a complex stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary may not be ideal candidates for guideline compliant therapy by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) regarding invasiveness and perioperative complications. However, they may benefit from minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting and hybrid revascularization (HCR). Methods A logistic European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation score (logES) >10% defined high risk. In high-risk patients with MVD undergoing MIDCAB or HCR, the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) after 30 days and during midterm follow-up was evaluated. Results Out of 1,250 patients undergoing MIDCAB at our institution between 1998 and 2015, 78 patients (logES: 18.5%; age, 76.7 ± 8.6 years) met the inclusion criteria. During the first 30 days, mortality and rate of MACCE were 9.0%; early mortality was two-fold overestimated by logES. Complete revascularization as scheduled was finally achieved in 64 patients (82.1%). Median follow-up time reached 3.4 (1.2–6.5) years with a median survival time of 4.7 years. Survival after 1, 3, and 5 years was 77, 62, and 48%. Conclusion In high-risk patients with MVD, MIDCAB is associated with acceptable early outcome which is better than predicted by logES. Taking the high-risk profile into consideration, midterm follow-up showed satisfying results, although scheduled HCR was not realized in a relevant proportion. In selected cases of MVD, MIDCAB presents an acceptable alternative for high-risk patients.

P6516The association between prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery and outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): an observational study of 123,780 patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Beirne ◽  
K Rathod ◽  
A Jain ◽  
A Mathur ◽  
A Wragg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Bypass Grafts ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Limited information exists regarding procedural success and clinical outcomes in patients with previous CABG undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to compare outcomes in patients undergoing PCI with or without previous coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG). Methods This was an observational cohort study of 123,780 consecutive PCI procedures from the Pan-London (United Kingdom) PCI registry, from January 2005 to December 2015. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality at a median follow-up of 3.0 years (interquartile range 1.2–4.6 years). Results 12,641 (10.2%) patients had a history of previous CABG, of whom 29.3% (n=3,703) underwent PCI to native vessels and 70.7% (n=8,938) to bypass grafts. There were significant differences in the demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics of these groups. The risk of mortality during follow-up was significantly higher in patients with prior CABG (23.2%) (p=0.0005) compared to patients with no history of prior CABG (12.1%) and was seen for patients who underwent either native vessel (20.1%) or bypass graft PCI (24.2%, p<0.0001). However, after adjustment for baseline characteristics, there was no significant difference in outcomes seen between the groups when PCI was performed in native vessels in patients with previous CABG (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.77–1.34; P=0.89) but a significant increase in mortality among patients with PCI to bypass grafts (HR 1.33 95% CI 1.03–1.71, P=0.026). This was seen after multivariate adjustment and propensity matching. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Curves Conclusion Patients with prior CABG are older, with a greater comorbid burden and more complex procedural characteristics, but after adjustment for these differences clinical outcomes are similar to patients undergoing PCI without prior CABG. In these patients, native vessel PCI was associated with better outcomes compared to the treatment of vein grafts.

Hybrid coronary revascularization

2021 ◽  
pp. 359-362
Author(s):  
Michael O. Kayatta ◽  
Henry A. Liberman ◽  
Michael E. Halkos
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Traditionally, the treatment of coronary artery disease has been divided among medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass grafting. However, with hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR), both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting are utilized to treat different lesions in the same patient; the goal being to take advantage of the benefits of each procedure while minimizing their limitations. This chapter will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of hybrid coronary revascularization, patient selection, and the various techniques and strategies used in successful hybrid coronary revascularization programmes.

Is the Future of Coronary Arterial Revascularization a Hybrid Approach?

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Giambruno ◽  
Ahmad Hafiz ◽  
Stephanie A. Fox ◽  
Hugues Jeanmart ◽  
Richard C. Cook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Internal Thoracic Artery ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Stent Patency ◽  
Left Internal Thoracic Artery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Objective Hybrid coronary revascularization offers and combines the advantages of both surgical and percutaneous revascularization and eliminates at the same time the disadvantages of both procedures. The objective of this study was to assess graft and stent patency at 6 months, rate of bleeding, intensive care unit and hospital stay, rate of reintervention, and long-term clinical follow-up. Methods From March 2004 to November 2015, a total of 203 patients underwent robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery and PCI of a non-left anterior descending vessel in a single or two stage, at three different centers. Patients underwent 6-month angiographic follow-up. The mean ± SD clinical follow-up was 77.82 ±41.4 months. Results Successful hybrid coronary revascularization occurred in 196 of the 203 patients. One hundred forty-six patients underwent simultaneous surgical and percutaneous intervention. Nineteen patients underwent PCI before surgery, and 38 patient underwent PCI after surgery. No in-hospital mortality occurred. The mean ± SD ICU stay was 1 ± 1 days and the mean ± SD hospital stay was 5 ± 2 days. Only 13.3% of the patients required a blood transfusion. Six-month angiographic follow-up has been performed in the 95 patients, and it demonstrated a left internal thoracic artery anastomotic patency of 97.9% and stent patency of 92.6%. A total of 77.8 ± 41.4-month clinical follow-up demonstrated 95.1% survival, 92.6% freedom from angina, and 90.7% freedom from any form of coronary revascularization. Conclusions Hybrid coronary revascularization seems to be a promising and safe revascularization strategy. It provides selected patients with an alternative, functionally complete revascularization with minimal surgical trauma and good long-term clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcome of Noncardiac Surgery in Patients With History of Coronary Artery Revascularization by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 117967071774894
Author(s):  
Jungchan Park ◽  
Seung Hwa Lee ◽  
Jeayoun Kim ◽  
Myungsoo Park ◽  
Hyeon-Cheol Gwon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Noncardiac Surgery ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
History Of

Objective: Although safety concerns still remain among patients undergoing unanticipated noncardiac surgery after prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it has not been directly compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery in patients with prior (>6 months) coronary revascularization by PCI or CABG. Methods: From February 2010 to December 2015, 413 patients with a history of coronary revascularization, scheduled for noncardiac surgery were identified. Patients were divided into PCI group and CABG group and postoperative clinical outcome was compared between 2 groups. The primary outcome was composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in 1-year follow-up. Results: The 413 patients were divided according to prior coronary revascularization types: 236 (57.1%) into PCI and 177 (42.9%) into CABG group. In multivariate analysis within 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in clinical outcome which was composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-2.93; P = .24). The same result was present in propensity-matched population analysis (HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 0.68-3.0; P = .34). Conclusions: In patients undergoing noncardiac surgery with prior coronary revascularization by PCI or CABG performed on an average of 42 months after PCI and 50 months after CABG, postoperative clinical outcome at 1-year follow-up is comparable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document