scholarly journals Early Embolization for Ruptured Aneurysm in Acute Stage of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with Neurogenic Pulmonary Edema

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 170-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Meguro ◽  
K. Terada ◽  
N. Hirotsune ◽  
S. Nishino ◽  
T. Asano ◽  
...  

Four cases of ruptured aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) presented with severe neurogenic pulmonary edema (NPE). On admission, two patients were grade IV and two were grade V according to Hunt and Hess grading. All patients needed respiratory management with the assistance of a ventilator. Three of them underwent endovascular treatment for the ruptured aneurysms within three days from onset after ensuring hemodynamic stability. Immediately after the endovascular treatment, lumbar spinal drainage was inserted in all the patients. The pulmonary edema findings disappeared rapidly after the respiratory management. The results were good recovery in two, and moderate disability in two. We concluded that early embolization of ruptured aneurysm and placement of spinal drainage is a satisfactory option for severe SAH with NPE.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiang Chen ◽  
Maohua Chen ◽  
Chuan Lu ◽  
Jun Sun ◽  
Huajun Ba

Abstract Background: Neurogenic pulmonary edema is a relatively rare and severe complication of acute central neurologic injury, particularly aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. It has been rather neglected and even misdiagnosed in clinical practice due to its non-specific manifestation. Case presentation: We describe a 44‑year‑old woman suffering from the life-threatening pulmonary edema with a aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. She was successfully treated with positive end-expiratory pressure and coil embolization at acute stage. The patient was discharged without neurological deficits. Conclusions: Early endovascular intervention and proper timely management of neurogenic pulmonary edema is critical for improving outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Keywords: Neurogenic pulmonary edema, subarachnoid hemorrhage, aneurysmal rupture.


2017 ◽  
Vol 159 (4) ◽  
pp. 705-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tijana Nastasovic ◽  
Branko Milakovic ◽  
Jelena Eric Marinkovic ◽  
Danica Grujicic ◽  
Mila Stosic

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 125-132
Author(s):  
Tijana Nastasović ◽  
Branko Milaković ◽  
Mila Stošić ◽  
Ivana Lazarević ◽  
Miloš Kaluđerović ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daraspreet S Kainth ◽  
Malik M Adil ◽  
Hunar S Kainth ◽  
Adnan Qureshi

Background: Rising medical expenditures and the discrepancies in Medicare reimbursements have placed restraints on the health care delivery system. The goal of this study is to quantify these differences in the management of Medicare beneficiaries admitted with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and to evaluate the sustainability of our current health care reimbursement practices. Material and Methods: Patients entered in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2009 and 2010, with International Classification of Diseases codes for a diagnosis of ruptured aneurysm who underwent either surgical or endovascular treatment of the cerebral aneurysm, were included in the study. Factors associated with higher hospitalization cost were identified and correlations with age, sex, medical co morbidities, and discharge status were examined. Results: In 2009 and 2010, the average hospital charges for the 9,097 Medicare patients admitted with a ruptured aneurysm were $270,937 for patients treated with endovascular and $259,131 for patients treated with surgical treatment. These charges are substantially higher than the 2008 average Medicare (MS-DRG) payment, $36,304 for treatment of patients with co morbidity, and $30,380 without co morbidity. A greater number of endovascular treatments were performed, 6290, compared to 2807 surgical treatments. Of both treatments, women were more frequently treated. 78.4% of surgical treatments and 73.3% of endovascular treatments were for women. A higher percentage of patients treated with endovascular treatment had minimal disability at discharge compared with patients treated with surgical treatment (26.9% vs 16.8%, p = 0.005). However, the re-imbursement of both treatments was equivalent. Conclusions: Hospitalization charges for the care of Medicare beneficiaries who undergo surgical or endovascular treatment of ruptured aneurysms are significantly higher than Medicare reimbursement. Women undergo the majority of treatments and endovascular treatment appears to be associated with less disability at discharge. The current discrepancies in hospital expenses and reimbursement may lead to unsustainable healthcare delivery for these patients.


1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuji NIIKAWA ◽  
Hiroaki NOKURA ◽  
Toshiro UNO ◽  
Yasuo KAGAWA ◽  
Akio OHKUMA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document