Endovascular repair with chimney technique of abdominal aortic aneurysm with hostile aortic neck

Vascular ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 323-329
Author(s):  
Jang Yong Kim ◽  
Jae Young Park ◽  
Soon Gu Cho ◽  
Chan Ik Jin ◽  
W. Anthony Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Type I ◽  
Chimney Technique ◽  
Aortic Neck ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Hostile Neck ◽  
One Year

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with hostile aortic neck is not a good candidate for conventional endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), and a recent paper showed that EVAR with chimney technique (Ch-EVAR) yielded reasonable outcome. We report here a case of successful Ch-EVAR treatment of AAA with hostile neck. An 81-year-old man presented with a 71-mm AAA during evaluation of a gastric ulcer. Aortic neck was 30 mm in diameter, 10–15 mm in length and angulated by 100°. EVAR was performed with chimney stenting to both renal arteries, and the patient recovered after transient hematuria. At one-year follow-up, AAA had increased by 7 mm with delayed type I endoleak control without renal insufficiency. The patient needed close follow-up.

Impact of Gender on Outcomes Following Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
pp. 636-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satinderjit Locham ◽  
Abdelrahman Shaaban ◽  
Linda Wang ◽  
Dennis Bandyk ◽  
Marc Schermerhorn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Aortic Neck ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Hostile Neck ◽  
Neck Anatomy ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Objective: The purpose of this study is to use a large, nationally representative vascular database to assess differences in patient characteristics, aortic neck anatomy, and outcomes between men and women following open (open aneurysm repair [OAR]) and endovascular (endovascular aneurysm repair [EVAR]) abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Methods: Patients undergoing AAA repair from 2003 to 2018 in Vascular Quality Initiative were identified and stratified by procedure (EVAR vs OAR). Thirty-day mortality and major in-hospital complications were assessed between genders within each operative cohort. An EVAR subset analysis was performed to assess differences in aortic neck anatomy; hostile neck anatomy was defined as length <15 mm (L < 15), angle >60° (A > 60), and/or diameter >28 mm (D > 28). Standard univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. Results: A total of 50 213 patients were identified: 9263 (19%) OAR and 40 950 (82%) EVAR. In both cohorts, majority of patients were men (OAR 73% and EVAR 81%). Women were more likely to have a hostile neck (31.7% vs 24.1%, P < .001), L < 15 (19.8% vs 11.9%, P < .001), and A > 60 (11.5% vs 5.4%, P < .001). Men had larger aneurysm (mean, 57 vs 55 mm, P < .001) and were more likely to have D > 28 (14.0% vs 10.6%, P < .001). Women undergoing EVAR were more likely to undergo aortic extensions (21.9% vs 16.0%) and receive higher contrast volume. After adjusting for potential confounders, female gender was associated with 86% and 50% increased risk of 30-day mortality in OAR and EVAR, respectively. Women were more likely than men to experience renal, cardiac, and pulmonary complications only in the EVAR cohort. Women had a 2-fold increased odds of developing type 1 endoleak. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates unfavorable neck anatomy occurs more frequently in women compared to men. Women were also at an increased risk of developing major complications, particularly following EVAR. Careful patient selection is indicated in all patients to reduce complications, with special attention in women with hostile neck.

scholarly journals Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm: Preliminary results

2009 ◽  
Vol 137 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 10-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lazar Davidovic ◽  
Momcilo Colic ◽  
Igor Koncar ◽  
Dejan Markovic ◽  
Dusan Kostic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Endovascular Stent ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Graft Thrombosis ◽  
Abdominal Aortic

Introduction. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been introduced into clinical practice at the beginning of the 90's of the last century. Because of economic, political and social problems during the last 25 years, the introduction of this procedure in Serbia was not possible. Objective. The aim of this study was to present preliminary experiences and results of the Clinic for Vascular Surgery of the Serbian Clinical Centre in Belgrade in endovascular treatment of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods. The procedure was performed in 33 patients (3 female and 30 male), aged from 42 to 83 years. Ten patients had a descending thoracic aorta aneurysm (three atherosclerotic, four traumatic - three chronic and one acute as a part of polytrauma, one dissected, two penetrated atherosclerotic ulcers), while 23 patients had the abdominal aortic aneurysm, one ruptured and two isolated iliac artery aneurysms. The indications for EVAR were isthmic aneurismal localisation, aged over 80 years and associated comorbidity (cardiac, pulmonary and cerebrovasular diseases, previous thoracotomy or multiple laparotomies associated with abdominal infection, idiopatic thrombocitopaenia). All of these patients had three or more risk factors. The diagnosis was established using duplex ultrasonography, angiography and MSCT. In the case of thoracic aneurysm, a Medtronic-Valiant? endovascular stent graft was implanted, while for the abdominal aortic aneurysm Medtronic-Talent? endovascular stent grafts with delivery systems were used. In three patients, following EVAR a surgical repair of the femoral artery aneurysm was performed, and in another three patients femoro-femoral cross over bypass followed implantation of aortouniiliac stent graft. Results. During procedure and follow-up period (mean 1.6 years), there were: one death, one conversion, one endoleak type 1, six patients with endoleak type 2 that disappeared during the follow-up period, one early graft thrombosis. No other complications, including aneurysm expansion, collapse, deformity and migration of the endovascular stent grafts, were registered. Conclusion. According to all medical and economic aspects, we recommend EVAR to treat acute traumatic thoracic aortic aneurysm, as well as in elderly and high-risk patients with abdominal or thoracic aneurysms, when open surgery is related to a significantly higher mortality and morbidity.

Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Challenging Anatomy: Utility of the Hybrid Endograft

Vascular ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
William D. Jordan ◽  
Thomas C. Naslund ◽  
Mark A. Adelman ◽  
Gene Simoni ◽  
Douglas J. Wirthlin
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Covered Stents ◽  
Aneurysm Size ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Commercially available aortic stent grafts differ in construction and clinical advantage such that creating hybrid endografts by combining components from different manufacturers is sometimes useful. We describe a multicenter experience using hybrid endografts to treat patients with challenging anatomy. Hospital records and office charts were reviewed from four institutions. Hybrid endografts were defined as those with two types of covered stents in continuity to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Indications for hybrid grafts were defined by type of endoleak and whether an endoleak was expected or unexpected as determined by the preoperative radiographic evaluation. Endpoints include intraoperative endoleaks, late endoleaks, change in aneurysm size, and rupture. Hybrid endografts were used to treat AAA (endovascular aneurysm repair [EVAR]) in 90 patients, representing 7.9% of the total multicenter experience. In 7 patients (7.8%), a hybrid graft construction as a secondary procedure successfully corrected a type 1 endoleak. In the remaining 83 patients (92.2%), hybrid grafts were created at the time of original EVAR to treat expected challenging anatomy or unexpected endoleaks. Hybrid endografts corrected 88 (97.8%) type 1 endoleaks, but 2 patients (2.2%) persisted with a proximal type 1 leak requiring conversion. During follow-up of 1 to 24 months, computed tomography and ultrasound surveillance, available for 73 patients (81.1%), detected one unresolved distal type 1 (1.1%) and seven type 2 (7.8%) endoleaks. Aneurysm size decreased at least 0.5 cm in 23 of 50 patients (46.0%) at 6 months and in 19 of 31 patients (61.3%) at 12 months. Aneurysm size increased at least 0.5 cm in 4 of 50 patients (8.0%) at 6 months and in 1 of 31 patients (3.2%) at 12 months. There were no ruptures. Hybrid endografts have favorable early and intermediate results in the treatment of AAA. Long-term follow-up will be needed to confirm the absence of significant adverse biomaterial interaction and the effect on AAA exclusion. We advocate the use of hybrid endografts as endovascular therapy for patients whose anatomy may be unsuitable for a single endograft type.

Effects of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Size on Mid- and Long-term Mortality After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haekyung Jeon-Slaughter ◽  
Harish Krishnamoorthi ◽  
David Timaran ◽  
Amanda Wall ◽  
Bala Ramanan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Optimal Cutoff ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Purpose: To investigate the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) size on mid- and long-term survival after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Materials and Methods: Retrospective data were collected from 325 consecutive patients (mean age 69.7 ± 8.5 years; 323 men) who underwent EVAR for intact AAA at a single institution between January 2003 and December 2013. The primary endpoint was death at 3, 5, and 10 years after EVAR. Optimal cutoff points for AAA size and age were determined using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Time to event analyses (Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models) were employed to determine any differences in all-cause mortality outcomes between AAA size groups. Cox models were adjusted for age and other comorbidities (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, smoking status, symptomatic status, and creatinine); the outcomes are reported as the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The cohort was dichotomized according to the ROC analysis, which defined an optimal cutoff point of 5.6 cm for AAA size and >70 years for age. The mean follow-up period post EVAR was 45.5±29.2 months. In total, 134 (41.2%) patients died during the 10-year follow-up. Thirty-day mortality was 1.1% (2/184) in the patients with AAA <5.6 cm and 2.1% (3/141) in patients with AAA ≥5.6 cm (p=0.45). All-cause mortality was not significantly affected by comorbidities. However, AAA size ≥5.6 cm was associated with increased 3-year mortality risk (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.001 to 2.52, p<0.049) but not 5-year (HR 1.44, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.10, p=0.062) or 10-year mortality (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.80, p=0.149). After adjusting for comorbidities, AAA size ≥5.6 cm was no longer significantly associated with morality at any time point. Using a larger size cutoff (AAA size ≥6.0 cm) resulted in improved statistical significance in the unadjusted model. In the adjusted Cox model, AAA size ≥6.0 cm was significantly associated with increased risk of mortality at 3 years (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.77, p<0.047), but not at longer time points. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that midterm survival after EVAR is significantly and independently associated with AAA size even after correcting for comorbidities. However, in the long term, preoperative AAA size is not an independent predictor of mortality.

The effect of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair on Renal Function in Patients Treated for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (44) ◽  
pp. 4675-4685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petroula Nana ◽  
George Kouvelos ◽  
Alexandros Brotis ◽  
Konstantinos Spanos ◽  
Athanasios Giannoukas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Failure ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Chronic Renal Failure ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Aim: The effect of endovascular aneurysm repair in patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm has not been clearly defined. The objective of the present article was to provide a contemporary literature review and perform an analysis to determine the effect of EVAR on renal function in the early post-operative period and during follow-up. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify all studies reporting the effect of EVAR on renal function. Outcome data were pooled and combined overall effect sizes were calculated using fixed or random-effects models. Results: Thirty-two studies reporting on 24846 patients were included. Acute renal failure after EVAR occurred with an estimated frequency of 9% (95%CI: 5-16%; I2=97%). Median follow-up period was 19.5 months (range 1-60 months). The estimated frequency of chronic renal failure during follow-up was 7% (95%CI: 3-17%; I2=98%). Hemodialysis was required in 2% (1-3%; I2=97%) of the cases. Conclusion: High-level evidence demonstrating the effect of EVAR on the incidence of acute and chronic renal failure is lacking. Based on the current available data, nearly 10% of patients undergoing EVAR for AAA have an increased risk for renal dysfunction after the procedure. Whether this deterioration may lead to a worse outcome has not been adequately proved.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document