Re: Mulford JS, Ceulemans LJ, Nam D, Axelrod TS. Proximal row carpectomy vs. four corner fusion for scapholunate (SLAC) or scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrists: a systematic review of outcomes. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 256–63.

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 819-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.K. Stanley
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. MULFORD ◽  
L. J. CEULEMANS ◽  
D. NAM ◽  
T. S. AXELROD

Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and scaphoid excision with four-corner fusion (4CF) are common motion-preserving, salvage procedures for the treatment of wrists with scaphoid nonunion (SNAC) or scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC). A systematic review was undertaken to clarify controversies regarding which of these procedures has the better outcome. We collated 52 articles that examine outcomes for SNAC or SLAC patients undergoing PRC or 4CF. Although the lack of unbiased trials must be acknowledged, this systematic review confirms that both procedures give improvements in pain and subjective outcome measures for patients with symptomatic and appropriately staged SLAC or SNAC wrists. PRC may provide better postoperative range of movement and lacks the potential complications specific to 4CF (nonunion, hardware issues and dorsal impingement). However, the risk of subsequent osteoarthritis is significantly higher in PRC patients despite the majority being asymptomatic at the time of review. Grip strength, pain relief and subjective outcomes are similar in both treatment groups.


Hand Clinics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 663-669
Author(s):  
Randall W. Culp ◽  
Claude S. Williams

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 450-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Saltzman ◽  
J. M. Frank ◽  
W. Slikker ◽  
J. J. Fernandez ◽  
M. S. Cohen ◽  
...  

We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting clinical outcomes after proximal row carpectomy or to four-corner arthrodesis for scaphoid non-union advanced collapse or scapholunate advanced collapse arthritis. Seven studies (Levels I–III; 240 patients, 242 wrists) were evaluated. Significantly different post-operative values were as follows for four-corner arthrodesis versus proximal row carpectomy groups: wrist extension, 39 (SD 11º) versus 43 (SD 11º); wrist flexion, 32 (SD 10º) versus 36 (SD 11º); flexion-extension arc, 62 (SD 14º) versus 75 (SD 10º); radial deviation, 14 (SD 5º) versus 10 (SD 5º); hand grip strength as a percentage of contralateral side, 74% (SD 13) versus 67% (SD 16); overall complication rate, 29% versus 14%. The most common post-operative complications were non-union (grouped incidence, 7%) after four-corner arthrodesis and synovitis and clinically significant oedema (3.1%) after proximal row carpectomy. Radial deviation and post-operative hand grip strength (as a percentage of the contralateral side) were significantly better after four-corner arthrodesis. Four-corner arthrodesis gave significantly greater post-operative radial deviation and grip strength as a percentage of the opposite side. Wrist flexion, extension, and the flexion-extension arc were better after proximal row carpectomy, which also had a lower overall complication rate. Level of evidence: Level III (Level I-III studies), Systematic Review. Therapeutic.


2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (5) ◽  
pp. 1432-1445 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Daar ◽  
Ajul Shah ◽  
Joshua T. Mirrer ◽  
Vishal Thanik ◽  
Jacques Hacquebord

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1797-1805.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M. Pinder ◽  
Milos Brkljac ◽  
Louise Rix ◽  
Lindsay Muir ◽  
Mark Brewster

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document