Clinical outcomes of proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis for post-traumatic wrist arthropathy: a systematic review

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 450-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Saltzman ◽  
J. M. Frank ◽  
W. Slikker ◽  
J. J. Fernandez ◽  
M. S. Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Wrist Flexion ◽  
Proximal Row Carpectomy ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Radial Deviation ◽  
Hand Grip ◽  
Flexion Extension

We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting clinical outcomes after proximal row carpectomy or to four-corner arthrodesis for scaphoid non-union advanced collapse or scapholunate advanced collapse arthritis. Seven studies (Levels I–III; 240 patients, 242 wrists) were evaluated. Significantly different post-operative values were as follows for four-corner arthrodesis versus proximal row carpectomy groups: wrist extension, 39 (SD 11º) versus 43 (SD 11º); wrist flexion, 32 (SD 10º) versus 36 (SD 11º); flexion-extension arc, 62 (SD 14º) versus 75 (SD 10º); radial deviation, 14 (SD 5º) versus 10 (SD 5º); hand grip strength as a percentage of contralateral side, 74% (SD 13) versus 67% (SD 16); overall complication rate, 29% versus 14%. The most common post-operative complications were non-union (grouped incidence, 7%) after four-corner arthrodesis and synovitis and clinically significant oedema (3.1%) after proximal row carpectomy. Radial deviation and post-operative hand grip strength (as a percentage of the contralateral side) were significantly better after four-corner arthrodesis. Four-corner arthrodesis gave significantly greater post-operative radial deviation and grip strength as a percentage of the opposite side. Wrist flexion, extension, and the flexion-extension arc were better after proximal row carpectomy, which also had a lower overall complication rate. Level of evidence: Level III (Level I-III studies), Systematic Review. Therapeutic.

Quantification of Hand Grip Force under Dynamic Conditions

1993 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 715-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine R. Lehman ◽  
W. Gary Allread ◽  
P. Lawrence Wright ◽  
William S. Marras
Keyword(s):  
Grip Force ◽  
Wrist Flexion ◽  
Range Of Movement ◽  
Ulnar Deviation ◽  
Dynamic Conditions ◽  
Radial Deviation ◽  
Hand Grip ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Maximum Grip ◽  
Lower Grip

A laboratory experiment was conducted to determine whether grip force capabilities are lower when the wrist is moved than in a static position. The purpose was to determine the wrist velocity levels and wrist postures that had the most significant effect on grip force. Maximum grip forces of five male and five female subjects were determined under both static and dynamic conditions. The dominant wrist of each subject was secured to a CYBEX II dynamometer and grip force was collected during isokinetic wrist deviations for four directions of motion (flexion to extension, extension to flexion, radial to ulnar, and ulnar to radial). Six different velocity levels were analyzed and grip forces were recorded at specific wrist positions throughout each range of movement. For flexion-extension motions, wrist positions from 45 degrees flexion to 45 degrees extension were analyzed whereas positions from 20 degrees radial deviation to 20 degrees ulnar deviation were studied for radial-ulnar activity. Isometric exertions were also performed at each desired wrist position. Results showed that, for all directions of motion, grip forces for all isokinetic conditions were significantly lower than for the isometric exertions. Lower grip forces were exhibited at extreme wrist flexion and extreme radial and ulnar positions for both static and dynamic conditions. The direction of motion was also found to affect grip strength; extension to flexion exertions produced larger grip forces than flexion to extension exertions and radial to ulnar motion showed larger grip forces than ulnar to radial deviation. Although, males produced larger grip forces than females in all exertions, significant interactions between gender and velocity were noted.

Proximal Row Carpectomy Versus Limited Wrist Arthrodesis for Advanced Kienböck’s Disease

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 741-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. NAKAMURA ◽  
E. HORII ◽  
K. WATANABE ◽  
E. NAKAO ◽  
H. KATO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grip Strength ◽  
Wrist Pain ◽  
Wrist Flexion ◽  
Proximal Row Carpectomy ◽  
Wrist Arthrodesis ◽  
Kienböck’S Disease ◽  
Kienböck's Disease ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Kienbock’S Disease

The outcomes in 20 patients with advanced Kienböck's disease treated by proximal row carpectomy (seven patients) or limited wrist arthrodesis (13 patients) were reviewed retrospectivey. Postoperatively, the results were more satisfactory in terms of wrist pain, the range of wrist flexion–extension, and grip strength following limited wrist arthrodesis than after proximal row carpectomy, although the differences were not statistically significant. We recommend scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthrodesis in selected patients with advanced Kienböck's disease who have a fragmented lunate.

Proximal Row Carpectomy through a Palmar Approach

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 406-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. LUCHETTI ◽  
O. SORAGNI ◽  
T. FAIRPLAY
Keyword(s):  
Grip Strength ◽  
Slight Reduction ◽  
Wrist Flexion ◽  
Proximal Row Carpectomy ◽  
Ulnar Deviation ◽  
Dynamic Studies ◽  
Palmar Approach ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Subchondral Sclerosis

From 1990 to 1994, nine proximal row carpectomies were done through a palmar approach. With an average follow-up of 20 months, seven of the nine patients were completely painfree. Average range of wrist flexion/extension remained unchanged, and average radial/ulnar deviation increased from 25° to 46°. All the patients demonstrated an increase in grip strength in the operated hand. Four cases showed a slight reduction in articular space and subchondral sclerosis in the radiocapitate articulation, in spite of good function. Dynamic studies demonstrated no sign of radiocarpal instability. All the patients were very satisfied with the results and returned to their previous work within 2 months, on average.

scholarly journals Proximal Row Carpectomy with Total Scapoidectomy vs. Conventional Carpal Resection for ReMotion Total Wrist Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1865
Author(s):  
Stefan M. Froschauer ◽  
Matthias Holzbauer ◽  
Dietmar Hager ◽  
Oskar Kwasny ◽  
Dominik Duscher
Keyword(s):  
Grip Strength ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Proximal Row Carpectomy ◽  
Prosthesis Implantation ◽  
Total Wrist Arthroplasty ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Wrist Arthroplasty

High complication rates in total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) still lead to controversy in the medical literature, and novel methods for complication reduction are warranted. In the present retrospective cohort study, we compare the outcomes of the proximal row carpectomy (PRC) method including total scaphoidectomy (n = 22) to the manufacturer’s conventional carpal resection (CCR) technique, which retains the distal pole of the scaphoid (n = 25), for ReMotion prosthesis implantation in non-rheumatoid patients. Mean follow-up was 65.8 ± 19.8 and 80.0 ± 28.7 months, respectively. Pre- and postoperative clinical assessment included wrist flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation; Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores; and pain via visual analogue scale. At final follow-up, grip strength and satisfaction were evaluated. All complications, re-operations, and revision surgeries were noted. Clinical complications were significantly lower in the PRC group (p = 0.010). Radial impaction was detected as the most frequent complication in the CCR group (n = 10), while no PRC patients suffered from this complication (p = 0.0008). Clinical assessment, grip strength measurements, and the log rank test evaluating the re-operation as well as revision function showed no significant difference. All functional parameters significantly improved compared to preoperative values in both cohorts. In conclusion, we strongly recommend PRC for ReMotion prosthesis implantation.

scholarly journals A prospective study on outcome of function after proximal row carpectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Chaitanya Gadi ◽  
S. M. Venugopal ◽  
Bhaskaranand Kumar ◽  
Karthik Gudaru
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Neuromuscular Disorders ◽  
Wrist Flexion ◽  
Proximal Row Carpectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Traumatic ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Traumatic Arthritis

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a procedure with varied indications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes with PRC in wrist flexion deformities, neuromuscular disorders and also post-traumatic wrist arthritis.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A prospective study was performed on all patients who underwent PRC between April 2015 and December 2017, in BIRRD (T) hospital, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh with a minimum follow up of 6 months. Outcome was assessed in terms of range of motion (ROM), grip strength, quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QDASH) score and pain score. Data was analyzed using the Student t-test.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Thirty-two patients underwent PRC of which 12 are neuromuscular disorders, 10 are wrist flexion deformities, 10 are post-traumatic wrist arthritis. On the final follow-up, significant improvement in ROM was observed in wrist flexion deformities and neuromuscular disorders, whereas grip strength and QDASH scores showed a significant difference in post-traumatic wrist arthritis. Pain was studied only in post-traumatic wrist arthritis, all were very much pleased with pain reduction.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> PRC is fairly a reliable procedure for all the indications in our study. We consider that PRC is a promising procedure in correcting wrist flexion deformities. Though there has been significant improvement in all the parameters for all the cases, we consider this procedure is best suited for post-traumatic arthritis group.</p>

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Dorsal Capsuloplasty in Scapholunate Tears EWAS 3: Preliminary Results after a Minimum Follow-up of 1 Year

2018 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 324-330
Author(s):  
Rémy Coulomb ◽  
Pascal Kouyoumdjian ◽  
Olivier Mares ◽  
Benjamin Degeorge
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Wrist Arthroscopy ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Test Range ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Functional Scores

Purpose We retrospectively evaluated the results of all arthroscopic dorsal scapholunate (SL) capsuloplasty without pinning in patients presenting predynamic instability and dorsal capsuloscapholunate septum lesions on arthro–computed tomography scan after failed medical treatment. Materials and Methods Fifteen patients, mean age 34.3 years, underwent all arthroscopically assisted dorsal capsuloplasty. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively by a clinical (pain, Watson's test, range of motion, and strength), functional (quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand), patient-rated wrist evaluation, and Mayo wrist score scores), and radiological (SL gap and dorsal intercalated segmental instability [DISI]) examination. SL tears were evaluated during surgery by European Wrist Arthroscopy Society (EWAS) classification. Results The mean follow-up period was 20.2 months (range, 12–41). Preoperatively, positive Watson's test was noted in all cases. DISI deformity was noted in three cases without any SL gap. The SL instability was graded EWAS IIIB (n = 8) or EWAS IIIC (n = 7). Postoperatively, positive Watson's test was noted in only one case. Activity pain decreased from 7.8 preoperatively to 2.4 postoperatively. Range of motion in flexion–extension increased from 92.9 degrees preoperatively to 126.2 degrees postoperatively. Grip strength increased from 24.2 preoperatively to 38.2 postoperatively. At final follow-up, range of motion in flexion–extension and grip strength were estimated at 87 and 91% compared with contralateral side, respectively. All functional scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up. No radiographic SL gapping in grip views or DISI deformity was noted. Discussion Cadaveric studies demonstrated that the dorsal portion of SL ligament is critical for the stability of the SL complex. The entire arthroscopic SL capsuloplasty technique provides reliable results for pain relief, avoiding postoperative stiffness associated with open procedures. It is an alternative technique for patients with predynamic SL instability after failure of medical management and shall not prelude the resort to any further open procedure. Level of Evidence This is a level IV, case series.

Four-corner arthrodesis with a dorsal locking plate: 4–9-year follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 673-678
Author(s):  
Lionel Athlani ◽  
Sophie Sabau ◽  
Nicolas Pauchard ◽  
François Dap ◽  
Gilles Dautel
Keyword(s):  
Sick Leave ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Wrist Motion ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Preoperative Status ◽  
Wrist Function

We report the outcomes of four-corner arthrodesis for advanced wrist collapse in 50 patients (51 wrists) using a dorsal locking plate. At a mean follow-up of 6 years (range 4–9), pain was significantly reduced and wrist function was significantly improved compared with preoperative status. After four-corner arthrodesis, grip strength was 80% of the contralateral side, and wrist motion averaged 50° flexion–extension and 30° radioulnar deviation. Immobilization time was 5 weeks (4–6) and sick-leave was 3 months (2–5) following surgery. There were seven nonunions (14%) that underwent repeat arthrodesis. Three wrists were later converted to total arthrodesis due to persisting pain. Radiographic dorsal impingement was found in five wrists after four-corner arthrodesis and did not require reoperation. The outcomes appear not remarkably different from those reported using other fixation methods other than an apparent earlier return to activities. Level of evidence: IV

scholarly journals Do Impairments Predict Hand Dexterity After Distal Radius Fractures? A 6-Month Prospective Cohort Study

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavlos Bobos ◽  
Emily A. Lalone ◽  
Ruby Grewal ◽  
Joy C. MacDermid
Keyword(s):  
Grip Strength ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Small Object ◽  
Large Object ◽  
Post Injury ◽  
Ulnar Deviation ◽  
Hand Grip ◽  
Hand Dexterity ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Relationship Of

Background: The relationship of routinely measured grip and motion measures may be related to hand dexterity. This has not yet been thoroughly examined following a distal radius fracture (DRF). The purpose of this study was to investigate if impairments in range of motion (ROM) and grip strength predict hand dexterity 6 months following a DRF. Methods: Patients with DRFs were recruited from a specialized hand clinic. Hand grip was assessed with a J-Tech dynamometer; ROM was measured using standard landmarks and a manual goniometer. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify whether potential predictors (grip, ROM, age, hand dominance, and sex) were associated with 3-month or 6-month outcomes in large- and small-object subtests of the NK dexterity test in the affected hand. Results: Age, sex, and arc motion for radial-ulnar deviation were significant predictors of large-object hand dexterity explaining the 23% of the variation. For small-object hand dexterity, age and flexion-extension arc motion were significant predictors explaining 11% of the variation at 3 month after the fracture (n = 391). At 6 months post injury (n = 319), grip strength, arc motion for flexion-extension, and age were found to be significant predictors of large-object dexterity explaining 34% of the variance. For the small objects, age, grip strength, sex, and arc motion of radial-ulnar deviation explained 25% of the variation. Conclusions: Although this confirms that the impairments in ROM and grip that occur after a DRF can explain almost one-third of the variation in hand dexterity, it also suggests the need for dexterity testing to provide more accurate assessment.

scholarly journals Clinical outcome of combined scaphocapitate fusion and posterior interosseous neurectomy for stage III Kienbock’s disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1025
Author(s):  
Hossam Elden A. Abodonia ◽  
Mohammed H. Elbadawy ◽  
Ahmed A. Basha
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Kienböck’S Disease ◽  
Kienböck's Disease ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Kienbock’S Disease

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Treatment of Kienbock’s disease is still controversial. Several authors have described various surgical treatment options for Kienbock’s disease, all of whom reported successful treatment outcomes. The purpose of this study is to explore the clinical results of posterior interosseous neurectomy and scaphocapitate fusion as a treatment option for stage III Kienbock’s disease.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This study evaluated the range of motion, grip and functional results after treatment of ten wrists of stage III Kienbock’s disease. Four males and six females with average age of 26.3 years, seven dominant and three non-dominant wrists were included. Two patients were smokers while six were housewives, three manual workers and a lawyer. The average follow up period was 14.2 months.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Four patients revealed excellent, three good and three fair results. The mean modified Mayo score was 81.5. Flexion-extension range was 105.5° representing 74.9% of the contralateral side range. The mean flexion and extension range of operated side was increased, while the flexion increase was nonsignificant. Regarding radial-ulnar deviation, the mean range was 33.5° representing 76.5% of the contralateral side. The mean ulnar and radial deviation was increased, while the radial increase was nonsignificant. The mean grip strength was significantly increased to 90 mmHg representing 93.2% of the contralateral side.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Scaphocpitate fusion is a recommended solution for treatment of late stages of Kienbock’s disease with lunate collapse. Longer postoperative time has a positive impact on grip strength and flexion-extension range of motion.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document