scholarly journals A New, Wireless-enabled Blood Glucose Monitoring System That Links to a Smart Mobile Device: Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 567-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Christiansen ◽  
Carmine Greene ◽  
Scott Pardo ◽  
Mary Ellen Warchal-Windham ◽  
Bern Harrison ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 744-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malte Rutschmann

In the study published in Journal of Diabetes, Science and Technology, Timothy S. Bailey and coauthors evaluated system accuracy and user performance of a new, wireless-enabled blood glucose monitoring system, the Contour Plus ONE blood glucose monitoring system. The authors declare that the study protocol was performed according to ISO 15197:2013 guidelines, in particular to clauses 6.3 and 8. Results show a high level of accuracy of the product in a laboratory setting as well as in the hands of lay users. However, differences between both study parts emerge that stimulate discussion about the used comparison method.


2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 152-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Caswell ◽  
Joy Frank ◽  
Maria T. Viggiani ◽  
Scott Pardo ◽  
Nancy Dunne ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 736-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy S. Bailey ◽  
Jane F. Wallace ◽  
Scott Pardo ◽  
Mary Ellen Warchal-Windham ◽  
Bern Harrison ◽  
...  

Background: The new Contour®Plus ONE blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) features an easy-to-use, wireless-enabled blood glucose meter that links to a smart mobile device via Bluetooth® connectivity and can sync with the Contour™ Diabetes app on a smartphone or tablet. Methods: The accuracy of the new BGMS was assessed in 2 studies according to ISO 15197:2013 criteria. In Study 1 (laboratory study), fingertip capillary blood samples from 100 subjects were tested in duplicate using 3 test strip lots. In Study 2 (clinical study), 134 subjects with type 1 or type 2 diabetes enrolled at 2 clinical sites. BGMS results and YSI analyzer (YSI) reference results were compared for fingertip blood obtained by untrained subjects’ self-testing and for study staff–obtained fingertip, subject palm, and venous results. Results: In Study 1, 99.0% (594/600) of combined results for all 3 test strip lots fulfilled ISO 15197:2013 Section 6.3 accuracy criteria. In Study 2, 99.2% (133/134) of subject-obtained capillary fingertip results, 99.2% (133/134) of study staff–obtained fingertip results, 99.2% (125/126) of subject-obtained palm results, and 100% (132/132) of study staff–obtained venous results met ISO 15197:2013 Section 8 accuracy criteria. Moreover, 95.5% (128/134) of subject-obtained fingertip self-test results were within ±10 mg/dl (±0.6 mmol/L) or ±10% of the YSI reference result. Questionnaire results showed that most subjects found the BGMS easy to use. Conclusions: The BGMS exceeded ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria both in the laboratory and in a clinical setting when used by untrained subjects with diabetes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 448 ◽  
pp. 139-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Bailey ◽  
Jane F. Wallace ◽  
Carmine Greene ◽  
Scott Pardo ◽  
Daniel Brown ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 683-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Freckmann ◽  
Nina Jendrike ◽  
Annette Baumstark ◽  
Stefan Pleus ◽  
Christina Liebing ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document