Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Support Self-Care: Results From a Pilot Study of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

2021 ◽  
pp. 193229682110538
Author(s):  
Michael Porter ◽  
Stephanie Fonda ◽  
Tamara Swigert ◽  
Nicole Ehrhardt
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 509-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penelope J. Taylor ◽  
Campbell H. Thompson ◽  
Natalie D. Luscombe-Marsh ◽  
Thomas P. Wycherley ◽  
Gary Wittert ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 973-P
Author(s):  
ALLISON LAROCHE ◽  
KRISTINA UTZSCHNEIDER ◽  
CATHERINE PIHOKER

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt Midyett ◽  
Jeffrey R. Unger ◽  
Eugene E. Wright ◽  
Timothy D. Daniel ◽  
Davida F. Kruger ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Richard M. Bergenstal ◽  
Jennifer E. Layne ◽  
Howard Zisser ◽  
Robert A. Gabbay ◽  
Nathan A. Barleen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Calhoun ◽  
Terri Kang Johnson ◽  
Jonathan Hughes ◽  
David Price ◽  
Andrew K. Balo

Acetaminophen (APAP) can cause erroneously high readings in real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) systems. APAP-associated bias in an investigational rtCGM system (G6) was evaluated by taking the difference in glucose measurements between rtCGM and YSI from 1 hour before to 6 hours after a 1-g oral APAP dose in 66 subjects with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The interference effect was defined as the average post-dose (30-90 minutes) bias minus the average baseline bias for each subject. The clinically meaningful interference effect was defined as 10 mg/dL. The G6 system’s overall mean (±SD) interference effect was 3.1 ± 4.8 mg/dL (one-sided upper 95% CI = 4.1 mg/dL), significantly lower than 10 mg/dL. The G6 system’s resistance to APAP interference should provide reassurance to those using the drug.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sérgio Vencio ◽  
Isabela Caiado-Vencio ◽  
Adriana Caiado ◽  
Douglas Morgental ◽  
Luisa Soares Dantas ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grazia Aleppo ◽  
Roy W. Beck ◽  
Ryan Bailey ◽  
Katrina J. Ruedy ◽  
Peter Calhoun ◽  
...  

<b>Objective: </b>To explore the effect of discontinuing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) after 8 months of CGM use in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal without bolus insulin. <p><b>Research Design and Methods:</b> Multi-center trial with an initial randomization to either real-time CGM or blood glucose monitoring (BGM) for 8 months, followed by 6 months in which the BGM Group continued to use BGM (N=57) and the CGM Group was re-randomized either to continue CGM (N=53) or discontinue CGM with resumption of BGM for glucose monitoring (N=53). </p> <p><b>Results: </b>In the group that discontinued CGM, mean time in range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR), which improved from 38% prior to initiating CGM to 62% after 8 months of CGM, decreased after discontinuing CGM to 50% at 14 months (mean change from 8 to 14 months = -12%, 95% CI -21% to -3%, P=0.01). In the group continuing CGM, there was little change in TIR from 8 to 14 months (baseline 44%, 8 months 56%, 14 months 57%; mean change 8 to 14 months = 1%, 95% CI -11% to 12%, P=0.89). Comparing the two groups at 14 months, the adjusted treatment group difference in mean TIR was -6% (95% CI -16% to 4%, P=0.20).</p> <p><b>Conclusions: </b>In adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin who had been using real-time CGM for 8 months, discontinuing CGM resulted in a loss of about half of the initial gain in TIR that had been achieved during CGM use.</p>


Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 913-P
Author(s):  
YUYA TAKANO ◽  
YULIA NAMIKI ◽  
HIROKO HIIRAGI ◽  
TAKU YAMADA ◽  
HIROTO SASAKI ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document