scholarly journals Impaired quality of life and diabetic foot disease in Saudi patients with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205031211983209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sana A AlSadrah

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the overall health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with diabetic foot disease compared to diabetic patients without diabetic foot and to identify the clinical utility of this assessment. Methods: A total of 250 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (100/150 with/without diabetic foot, respectively) were interviewed. The questionnaires of the 36-item short-form survey and region-specific foot and ankle ability measure were applied. Wagner–Meggitt wound classification was used for foot-ulcer evaluation. Follow-up of patients for 3–6 weeks was done to identify the potential clinical short outcomes of diabetic foot ulcers. Results: Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with diabetic foot exhibited poor mental and physical health consequences. Females had more prevalence of forefoot lesions, larger ulcer size, advanced Wagner grade, and higher frequency of unhealed ulcers. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated high value of foot and ankle ability measure and 36-item short-form questionnaires to discriminate type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with and without diabetic foot at cutoff values of 66 and 49.6, respectively. Foot and ankle ability measure questionnaire also showed high performance for differentiating the clinical outcome of foot ulcer. Total foot and ankle ability measure subscale score above the cutoff value of 65.5 could discriminate patients with complete healing and unhealed ulcer lesions at a high sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: The current findings confirm the impact of diabetic foot disease on type 2 diabetes mellitus overall health-related quality of life reflected in 36-item short-form questionnaire and foot and ankle ability measure questionnaire which showed high discriminative values for type 2 diabetes mellitus patient sub-grouping. Their application in routine clinical health assessment with continuous medical education programs is highly recommended to achieve a better health-related quality of life.

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1179-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bustanul Arifin ◽  
Lusiana Rusdi Idrus ◽  
Antoinette D. I. van Asselt ◽  
Fredrick Dermawan Purba ◽  
Dyah Aryani Perwitasari ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. 911-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erinn T. Rhodes ◽  
Michael I. Goran ◽  
Tracy A. Lieu ◽  
Robert H. Lustig ◽  
Lisa A. Prosser ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jennifer Vieira Paschoalin Marques ◽  
Carla Regina de Souza Teixeira ◽  
Maria Lúcia Zanetti ◽  
Luciana Kusumota ◽  
Tânia Alves Canata Becker ◽  
...  

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the health-related quality of life and clinical parameters of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach, which was undertaken with 73 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a health unit of the Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) [Brazilian Unified Health System] in Ribeirão Preto city, São Paulo State, Brazil, in 2016. The DQOL-Brazil questionnaire, which covers the domains of satisfaction, impact, social and/or vocational concerns, and concerns about diabetes mellitus, was used for data collection. Results: Most of the participants were female, married, and retired with an average age of 62.7 years old. The domain of vocational and/or social concerns had the best score for quality of life while satisfaction had the worst. The quality of life of patients with altered glycated hemoglobin levels was worse than that of patients without such alterations. For those with unchanged hemoglobin glycated levels, the domain of social and/or vocational concerns had the best quality of life scores while the domain of satisfaction had the worst. Conclusion: The results can help the development of intervention studies and strategic plans in health services.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document