scholarly journals American Public Policy and Full Employment: The Imperative of Martin Luther King’s Political Economy in the 21st Century

SAGE Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 215824401880267
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Sommers ◽  
Rachel Hegland ◽  
Patrick Delices
2003 ◽  
pp. 111-118
Author(s):  
A. Oleinik

Reply to the article: Buzgalin A. Heuristic Potential of Political Economy of Socialism in the 21st Century (Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2003, No 3).


2021 ◽  
pp. 1087724X2110146
Author(s):  
Richard G. Little

In an essay almost 30 years ago, Professor Dick Netzer of NYU asked the question “Do We Really Need a National Infrastructure Policy?” and came to the conclusion that we did not. As the Biden Administration prepares to roll out a multi-trillion dollar infrastructure package, the nation is faced with numerous questions regarding the infrastructure systems necessary to support continued economic growth and environmental sustainability. The purpose of this essay is to look to recent history for guidance for how to proceed by revisiting the underlying premises of the Netzer essay and reconsider whether a National Infrastructure Policy is needed. Because linking infrastructure to broader public policy objectives could both unite the nation and position it to address the many challenges that the 21st century will present, I believe the idea of a National Infrastructure Policy definitely deserves a second look.


2003 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 156
Author(s):  
G. John Ikenberry ◽  
Harold L. Wilensky

2020 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 73-96
Author(s):  
Marc A. Hight

AbstractI draw attention to a group of thinkers in Ireland in the first half of the eighteenth century that made significant contributions to the philosophy of political economy. Loosely organized around the Dublin Philosophical Society founded in 1731, these individuals employed a similar set of assumptions and shared a common interest in the well-being of the Irish people. I focus on Samuel Madden (1686-1765), Arthur Dobbs (1689-1765), and Thomas Prior (1680–1751) and argue for two main theses. First, these Irish thinkers shared a number of commonalities with the English mercantilist thinkers of the eighteenth century, and to the degree that they did, their proposals to aid Ireland and reduce poverty were largely doomed to failure. Second, these Irish thinkers also importantly diverged from typical eighteenth-century mercantilist thinking in several ways. These modifications to mercantilism resulted in large part from the unusual political situation of Ireland (as a nation politically dependent on England) and helped orient their economic thinking along more institutional lines. In particular, the emphasis of the Irish on full employment and on the modification of social as well as political institutions is an early step forward in making political economy more sophisticated.


1998 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 531
Author(s):  
Mark Sproule-Jones ◽  
Melody Hessing ◽  
Michael Howlett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document