scholarly journals Obesity and recovery of muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in pediatric patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949901880663 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Jay Lee ◽  
Adam Margalit ◽  
Afam Nduaguba ◽  
Melissa A Gunderson ◽  
Lawrence Wells
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Peak Torque ◽  
Quadriceps Strength ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Muscle Recovery ◽  
Concomitant Injuries ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Purpose: To explore factors influencing muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients. We hypothesized that obesity/overweight, autograft hamstring tendon, and concomitant injuries would be associated with slower muscle recovery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of pediatric ACLR patients during a 3-year period. Muscle recovery was defined as ≥85% of peak torque compared with the contralateral side. We categorized patients as either obese/overweight or normal weight. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U, analysis of variance, and χ2 tests ( α level < 0.05). Results: The study group consisted of 330 patients, of whom 198 (60%) and 231 (70%) met quadriceps and hamstring recovery criteria, respectively, at final testing (mean: 7.0 ± 3.2 months). Patients recovered hamstring and quadriceps strength at a mean of 5.3 ± 2.2 months and 6.1 ± 2.3 months, respectively. Hamstring muscle recovery took significantly longer in obese/overweight patients (mean: 5.7 ± 2.2 months) versus normal-weight patients (mean: 5.1 ± 2.1 months; p = 0.025), but quadriceps recovery did not (obese/overweight mean: 6.5 ± 2.6 months; normal-weight mean: 5.9 ± 2.1 months; p = 0.173). Conclusion: Concomitant injuries and graft type were not associated with length of time to recovery of muscle strength. Obesity/overweight was associated with delay in recovery of hamstring but not quadriceps strength.

scholarly journals STRONGER THAN EVER! ADOLESCENT ATHLETES SHOW STRENGTH GAINS WITHIN THE UNINJURED LEG AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0005
Author(s):  
Elliot Greenberg ◽  
Joshua Bram ◽  
Theodore Ganley
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Peak Torque ◽  
Quadriceps Strength ◽  
Strength Assessment ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: The restoration of quadriceps strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is critical to restore optimal patient function and reduce the incidence of secondary ACL injury. Strength is typically quantified during return to sport assessments, by comparing the strength in the involved limb to that of the uninvolved limb. A limb symmetry index (LSI) is calculated and used to determine if any residual strength deficits persist. Recent evidence demonstrates that the uninvolved limb may lose strength during ACLR recovery and suggests that pre-operative uninvolved limb strength values may offer a better representation and more stringent indicator of strength recovery after ACLR. However, this body of literature is limited and no studies have specifically evaluated this occurrence within youth athletes. Purpose: To evaluate the change in strength in the uninvolved limb from pre-operative to 6 months post-ACLR, and assess the effect of pre-operative strength comparison on 6-month post-op LSI. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of pediatric patients (≤18 years) undergoing primary ACLR from 1/2018-1/2020 without concomitant multi-ligamentous reconstruction was conducted. Isokinetic peak torque values for the uninvolved and involved quadriceps were extracted at pre-operative (uninvolved only) and 6 months post-operative. Strength changes were analyzed using paired-samples t-test. Results: Complete data was available for a total of 17 subjects (mean age 15.1±1.7, 53% female). Pre-operative strength assessment was performed a mean of 11.5 days (range 1-26) prior to surgery. The mean 6-month post-operative assessment occurred at 177 days (range 127-246). The uninvolved limb was significantly stronger (p<0.001) at 6 months compared to preoperatively, with a mean improvement of 12.1ft/lbs (95%CI 18.3 – 7.2) with a change from 82.4ft/lbs to 95.1 ft/lbs. The LSI was calculated using both pre-operative and 6-month post-operative uninvolved limb values and demonstrated substantially lower LSI values when using concurrent 6-month data (LSIpre 91.3% vs LSI6M 76.9%). Conclusions: Among this sample, the uninvolved limb got stronger during post-ACLR recovery and comparison to concurrently assessed strength values led to a more stringent determination of LSI. Differences in rehabilitation programming, adolescent physiology, and pre-injury training patterns may explain why these results differ than those found in older cohorts.

scholarly journals Michigan Initiative for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rehabilitation (MiACLR): A Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 100 (12) ◽  
pp. 2154-2164
Author(s):  
Kazandra Rodriguez ◽  
Steven A Garcia ◽  
Cathie Spino ◽  
Lindsey K Lepley ◽  
Yuxi Pang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Quadriceps Muscle ◽  
Quadriceps Strength ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Abstract Objective Restoring quadriceps muscle strength following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may prevent the posttraumatic osteoarthritis that affects over 50% of knees with ACLR. However, a fundamental gap exists in our understanding of how to maximize muscle strength through rehabilitation. Neurological deficits and muscle atrophy are 2 of the leading mechanisms of muscle weakness after ACLR. High-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and eccentric exercise (ECC) have been shown to independently target these mechanisms. If delivered in succession, NMES and then ECC may be able to significantly improve strength recovery. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of NMES combined with ECC to restore quadriceps strength and biomechanical symmetry and maintain cartilage health at 9 and 18 months after ACLR. Methods This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center clinical trial conducted at the University of Michigan. A total of 112 participants between the ages of 14 and 45 years and with an anterior cruciate ligament rupture will be included. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to NMES combined with ECC or NMES placebo combined with ECC placebo. NMES or NMES placebo will be delivered 2 times per week for 8 weeks beginning 10 to 14 days postoperatively and will be directly followed by 8 weeks of ECC or ECC placebo delivered 2 times per week. The co-primary endpoints are change from baseline to 9 months and change from baseline to 18 months after ACLR in isokinetic quadriceps strength symmetry. Secondary outcome measures include isometric quadriceps strength, quadriceps activation, quadriceps muscle morphology (cross-sectional area), knee biomechanics (sagittal plane knee angles and moments), indexes of patient-reported function, and cartilage health (T1ρ and T2 relaxation time mapping on magnetic resonance imaging). Impact The findings from this study might identify an intervention capable of targeting the lingering quadriceps weakness after ACLR and in turn prevent deterioration in cartilage health after ACLR, thereby potentially improving function in this patient population.

scholarly journals Contribution of Neuromuscular Factors to Quadriceps Asymmetry After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexa K. Johnson ◽  
Riann M. Palmieri-Smith ◽  
Lindsey K. Lepley
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Peak Torque ◽  
Quadriceps Strength ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Return To Activity ◽  
Torque Development

Context:  To quantify quadriceps weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), researchers have often analyzed only peak torque. However, analyzing other characteristics of the waveform, such as the rate of torque development (RTD), time to peak torque (TTP), and central activation ratio (CAR), can lend insight into the underlying neuromuscular factors that regulate torque development. Objective:  To determine if interlimb neuromuscular asymmetry was present in patients with ACLR at the time of clearance to return to activity. Design:  Cross-sectional study. Setting:  Laboratory. Patients or Other Participants:  A total of 10 individuals serving as controls (6 men, 4 women; age = 23.50 ± 3.44 years, height = 1.73 ± 0.09 m, mass = 71.79 ± 9.91 kg) and 67 patients with ACLR (43 men, 24 women; age = 21.34 ± 5.73 years, height = 1.74 ± 0.11 m, mass = 77.85 ± 16.03 kg, time postsurgery = 7.52 ± 1.36 months) participated. Main Outcome Measure(s):  Isokinetic (60°/s) and isometric quadriceps strength were measured. Peak torque, TTP, and RTD were calculated across isometric and isokinetic trials, and CAR was calculated from the isometric trials via the superimposed burst. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to compare limbs in the ACLR and control groups. Results:  No between-limbs differences were detected in the control group (P &gt; .05). In the ACLR group, the involved limb demonstrated a longer TTP for isokinetic strength (P = .04; Cohen d effect size [ES] = 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.16, 0.52), lower RTD for isometric (P &lt; .001; Cohen d ES = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.38, 1.08) and isokinetic (P &lt; .001; Cohen d ES = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.49, 1.19) strength, lower CAR (P &lt; .001; Cohen d ES = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.71), and lower peak torque for isometric (P &lt; .001; Cohen d ES = 1.28; 95% CI = 0.91, 1.65) and isokinetic (P &lt; .001; Cohen d ES = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.78, 1.52) strength. Conclusions:  Interlimb asymmetries at return to activity after ACLR appeared to be regulated by several underlying neuromuscular factors. We theorize that interlimb asymmetries in isometric and isokinetic quadriceps strength were associated with changes in muscle architecture. Reduced CAR, TTP, and RTD were also present, indicating a loss of motor-unit recruitment or decrease in firing rate.

scholarly journals Which one Enhances Muscular Performance in ACL Reconstructed Subjects

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (11_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967114S0014
Author(s):  
Gulcan Harput ◽  
Burak Ulusoy ◽  
Ahmet Ozgur Atay ◽  
Gul Baltacı
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Functional Performance ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Quadriceps Strength ◽  
Knee Brace ◽  
Jump Performance ◽  
Muscular Performance ◽  
Test Conditions ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of functional knee brace and kinesiotaping on muscular performance in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed subjects who reached return to sport phase of the rehabilitation. Methods: Twenty (17 males, 3 females, Age: 24.7±7.1 years, Body weight: 74.4±12.0 kg, Height: 177.9±6.5 cm, BMI: 23.9±3.6 kg/m2) subjects who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by using hamstring tendon auto graft were included in this study. When the subjects reached the return to sports phase of rehabilitation which was 6th months after surgery, knee muscle strength, jump performance and balance tests were performed 3 times: bare, with knee brace and with kinesio taping. The order of the tests were randomized to eliminate the effects of fatigue and motor learning. Quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength was measured on an isokinetic dynamometer at 180 °/s and 60°/s angular velocities. Vertical Jump (VJ) and One Leg Hop Tests (OLHT) were used to assess jump performance. Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) with anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral reach distance was used to assess the dynamic balance. When all tests were performed, the subjects were asked under which test condition they felt more confident. Repeated measures of ANOVA was used to analyze the difference among three test conditions (bare, kinesiotaping, knee brace). Bonferroni post hoc test was used for pairwise comparison. Results: SEBT posteromedial (PM)and posterolateral (PL) reach distances were found significantly different among three test conditions(PM: F(2,38)=3.42,p=0.04), PL: F(2,38)=4.37,p=0.02). Kinesiotaping increased posteromedial reach distance (p=0.03). On the other hand, brace decreased posterolateral reach distance (p=0.04). VJ and OLHT performance were also found significantly different between three test conditions (VJ: F (2,38)=3.44,p=0.04, OLHT: (F(2,38)=4.04,p=0.02). Kinesio taping increased one leg hop distance (p=0.01). However, brace decreased VJ distance (p=0.04). Kinesiotaping had no effect on quadriceps and hamstring strength (p>0.05). Only brace increased the quadriceps strength at 180 °/s (p=0.02). 40% of the subjects felt more confident with knee brace; 25% of them were more confident with kinesiotaping and the rest (35%) of them were more confident with no brace and kinesiotaping. Conclusion: Kinesiotaping enhances balance and jump performance except for increasing knee strength in ACLR subjects at 6th months after surgery when they normally return to their sport. Although, knee brace increases quadriceps strength, it has adverse effect on functional performance . Therefore, Kinesiotaping can be applied for those patients when they start their sport specific training to enhance functional performance.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Failure After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Pediatric Population: A Prediction Algorithm

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596712199116
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Lemme ◽  
Daniel S. Yang ◽  
Brooke Barrow ◽  
Ryan O’Donnell ◽  
Alan H. Daniels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients is becoming increasingly common. There is growing yet limited literature on the risk factors for revision in this demographic. Purpose: To (1) determine the rate of pediatric revision ACLR in a nationally representative sample, (2) ascertain the associated patient- and injury-specific risk factors for revision ACLR, and (3) examine the differences in the rate and risks of revision ACLR between pediatric and adult patients. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The PearlDiver patient record database was used to identify adult patients (age ≥20 years) and pediatric patients (age <20 years) who underwent primary ACLR between 2010 and 2015. At 5 years postoperatively, the risk of revision ACLR was compared between the adult and pediatric groups. ACLR to the contralateral side was also compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the significant risk factors for revision ACLR and the overall reoperation rates in pediatric and adult patients; from these risk factors, an algorithm was developed to predict the risk of revision ACLR in pediatric patients. Results: Included were 2055 pediatric patients, 1778 adult patients aged 20 to 29 years, and 1646 adult patients aged 30 to 39 years who underwent ACLR. At 5 years postoperatively, pediatric patients faced a higher risk of revision surgery when compared with adults (18.0 % vs 9.2% [adults 20-29 years] and 7.1% [adults 30-39 years]; P < .0001), with significantly decreased survivorship of the index ACLR ( P < .0001; log-rank test). Pediatric patients were also at higher risk of undergoing contralateral ACLR as compared with adults (5.8% vs 1.6% [adults 20-29 years] and 1.9% [adults 30-39 years]; P < .0001). Among the pediatric cohort, boys (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.96; P = .0204) and patients >14 years old (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.86; P = .0035) had a decreased risk of overall reoperation; patients undergoing concurrent meniscal repair (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.43-2.38; P < .0001) or meniscectomy (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.72-2.82; P < .0001) had an increased risk of revision surgery. According to the risk algorithm, the highest probability for revision ACLR was in girls <15 years old with concomitant meniscal and medial collateral ligament injury (36% risk of revision). Conclusion: As compared with adults, pediatric patients had an increased likelihood of revision ACLR, contralateral ACLR, and meniscal reoperation within 5 years of an index ACLR. Families of pediatric patients—especially female patients, younger patients, and those with concomitant medial collateral ligament and meniscal injuries—should be counseled on such risks.

scholarly journals The hybrid anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgical technique does permit an accelerated early functional recovery and return to sport.

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0017
Author(s):  
Peter Annear ◽  
Ebert Jay
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Quadriceps Strength ◽  
Hamstring Graft ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Hop Tests ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tegner Score

Objectives: A major reason for undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) for patients is to return to high demand activity and sport. Published literature supports a return to sport (RTS) at 6-12 months, though the recovery of lower limb strength and functional symmetry is critical and is linked with a patient’s ability to RTS, as well as reducing the incidence of secondary re-tear. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and RTS between patients undergoing ACLR utilizing a hamstring graft and those undergoing a hybrid technique which augments the hamstring graft with a synthetic LARS ligament. Methods: A non-randomized study design was used to compare clinical outcomes at 10-12 months post-surgery, in 82 patients undergoing conventional ACLR via a hamstring graft (HG) and 35 patients undergoing a hybrid hamstring/LARS graft (HLG). All patients were assessed using a range of patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores (IKDC, KOOS, Cinncinati, Lysholm, SF-36, Tegner, Noyes, Global Rating of Change – GRC). Limb symmetry indices (LSIs) presenting the operated limb as a percentage of the unaffected limb were calculated for several strength/functional assessments (peak isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength, the single, triple and triple crossover hop for distance, and the 6 m timed hop). Results: There were no group differences (p>0.05) in patient demographics and the majority of PROs. The HLG group perceived themselves to be significantly ‘more recovered’ (p=0.046) on the GRC scale (HLG = 3.2, HG = 2.2), and also reported a significantly greater (p=0.004) Tegner score (HLG = 7.2, HG = 5.9). For the HG group, 62% of patients had returned to Noyes Level 1 or 2 activities, versus 80% of the HLG group. For the Tegner score, 57% of patients reported a score >6, versus 77% of the HLG group. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) in LSIs between groups for the strength and functional hop tests. However, the HLG group demonstrated a mean LSI above 90% for all four hop tests, while all four were below 90% in the HG group. Both groups demonstrated mean hamstring strength LSIs above 90%, while the quadriceps strength LSI was 81.9% and 85.8% for the HG and HLG groups, respectively. Conclusion: Patients in the HLG group perceived themselves to be more recovered, and had returned to a higher level of activity/sport, compared with the HG group. While not significant, the HLG group did demonstrate more favorable functional hop and quadriceps strength LSIs, which has been linked with the ability to RTS and the incidence of ACL re-tear. A larger patient cohort and follow-up is required to observe long-term outcomes.

scholarly journals USE CAUTION WHEN ASSESSING PRE-OPERATIVE LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURIES

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0028
Author(s):  
Lindsay M. Schlichte ◽  
Peter D. Fabricant ◽  
Christine Goodbody ◽  
Daniel W. Green
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Full Extension ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Length Discrepancy ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Pre- and post-operative standing hip to ankle radiography is critical for monitoring potential post-operative growth arrest and resultant length and angular deformities after pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. During acquisition of pre-operative standing alignment radiographs, it is possible that patients are lacking full extension, not weight bearing comfortably, or leaning resulting in inaccurate measurements. Purpose: This study aims to assess both pre- and post-operative radiographic measurements to assess if the standing pre-operative x-ray is a accurate and reliable source for baseline measurements. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected pre-operative and first post-operative full-length hip-to-ankle radiographs in a cohort of skeletally immature athletes who presented with an acute ACL injury and underwent subsequent surgical reconstruction. Initially, leg length discrepancy for 25 patients was measured by 3 orthopedic surgeons (top of femoral head to center of tibial plafond). The intraclass correlation was almost perfect (ICC (2,1) = .996) therefore, 1 surgeon measured the remaining 94 radiographs. Measurements for both the injured and uninjured legs were obtained for comparison and surgeons were blinded to the injured side. Results: A total of 119 pediatric patients (mean age 13.4, range 7-14 years) were included (83 males and 36 females). Patient were categorized as either having ≥5mm, ≥10mm, or ≥15mm LLD on pre-operative standing x-ray. Sixty-two patients (52%) were found to have a pre-operative LLD ≥ 5mm. Forty-one (66%) of these patients tore their ACL on the limb measuring shorter. At 6 month post-operative standing x-ray, 35 patients (56%) resolved to ≤5mm LLD. Eighteen patients had a pre-operative LLD of ≥ 10mm. At 6 month post-operative standing x-ray, 13 (72%) patients resolved to ≤5mm LLD. Five patients had a pre-operative LLD of ≥ 15mm. At 6 month post-operative standing x-ray, 4 (80%) resolved ≤5mm. All patients with a pre-operative LLD of ≥ 13mm had sustained an ACL injury on the limb measuring shorter Conclusion: Of the pediatric ACL patients initially presenting with a pre-operative LLD of ≥ 10mm, 72% demonstrated apparent correction of their LLD on their 6 month standing x-ray. This high rate of LLD pre-operatively but not post operatively calls into question the accuracy of pre-operative standing alignment radiographs for patients after an ACL tear. Surgeons and radiology technicians should be aware of injured patients potentially lacking full extension, leaning, or not weight bearing comfortably, and should consider delaying preoperative radiographic length and alignment analysis until after the patient is able to fully straighten the injured knee and weight bear comfortably.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document