Long-term outcomes of Wagner self-locking stem with bone allograft for Paprosky type II and III bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty: A mean 15.7-year follow-up

Abstract Background: Revision total hip arthroplasty is frequently accompanied by bone loss. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid- to long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty for massive femoral bone loss using cementless modular, fluted, tapered stems.Methods: During the period of 2007 to 2015 at a single hospital, 34 hips (33 patients) underwent primary revision surgery with cementless modular, fluted, tapered stems due to massive bone loss, and patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) or tumours were excluded. The hips were revised with the LINK MP (Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany) prosthesis. Bone loss was categorized by the Paprosky classification for prosthesis loosening and Vancouver classification for peri-prosthetic fracture. All revision bearing surfaces were ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC). Clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes and survivorship were evaluated.Results: The mean follow-up was 9.1±2.5 years (range, 5-13 years). The Harris hip score was 43.6±11.5 preoperatively and maintained at 86.5±6.6 at the time of latest follow-up (p<0. 05). The X-ray showed bone ingrowth fixation in 30 hips (88%), fibrous stable fixation in 3 hips (9%) and instability in 1 hip (3%). The average stem subsidence was 3.9±2.2 mm (range, 1 to 10 mm). The survivorship of prostheses with re-revision for any reason was 95% (95% CI, 12.0 to 13.0) at the 10-year follow-up. Three (9%) re-revisions were needed, including 1 for aseptic loosening, 1 for dislocation and 1 for infection.Conclusions: The mid- to long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with the cementless modular, fluted, tapered stem (LINK MP stem) are encouraging for massive femoral bone loss.

Download Full-text

Structural and Morselized Allografting Combined with a Cementless Cup for Acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 4- to 14-Year Follow-Up

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2018/2364269 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2018 ◽

pp. 1-7 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Hou-Tsung Chen ◽

Cheng-Ta Wu ◽

Tsan-Wen Huang ◽

Hsin-Nung Shih ◽

Jun-Wen Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Type Ii ◽

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Total Hip ◽

Press Fit ◽

Cementless Cup ◽

Revision Tha ◽

Acetabular Defects

Using morselized and structural allograft to restore bone stock for massive acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an appealing procedure. However, concerns about inability to achieve long-term stability following allograft resorption remained. From 2003 to 2012, 59 hips in 58 patients undergoing revision THA for Paprosky type II or III acetabular defects were retrospectively reviewed. The acetabular defects were managed with deep-frozen morselized and structural allografts, and a press-fit cementless cup along with supplementary screws. Clinical outcomes and radiographic results were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. The clinical successful rate was 100% for hips with Paprosky type II defect, 95.2% for IIIA defect, and 92.8% for IIIB defect. Three hips with type III defect failed at 4, 7, and 9 years, respectively. Harris Hip Score improved significantly from 60.1 preoperatively to 91.3 at the latest follow-up. All hips with good clinical results showed trabecular bridging in the allograft-host bone interface. Deep-frozen structural and morselized allograft in combination with a press-fit cementless cup represented a viable option to reconstruct acetabular defects in revision THA.

Download Full-text

Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing uncemented or cemented arthroplasty revision following metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty failure: A retrospective observational study with a mean follow-up of 7 years

10.21203/rs.2.20209/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Wenli Chen ◽

Mao Shuai ◽

Jinluan Lin ◽

Baomin Chen ◽

Mingdong Zhao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

High Rate ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Total Hip ◽

Metal On Metal

Abstract Background A high rate of complications due to metal-on-metal (MoM) revisions has been relatively commonly documented. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the long-term outcomes of patients who had undergone uncemented or cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision for prior primary MoM THA failure.Methods Data from 234 patients (234 hips) who underwent uncemented or cemented THA (UTHA or CTHA) for prior primary MoM THA failure during 2007 - 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Follow-up occurred 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and then every 1 year after conversion. The mean follow-up time was 84.15 months (range, 67 - 101 months). The primary endpoint was the modified Harris Hip Score (HHS). The secondary endpoint was the major orthopaedic complication rate.Results The HHS demonstrated statistically greater differences in the CTHA group than in the UTHA group 12 months after conversion. From the 12th month after conversion to the final follow-up, CTHA yielded better functional outcomes than UTHA. There were significant differences in the rates of re-revision, aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic fracture between the groups (10.3% for UTHA vs 2.5% for CTHA, p = 0.015; 16.3% for UTHA vs 5.9% for CTHA, p = 0.011; and 12.0% for UTHA vs 4.2% for CTHA, p = 0.045, respectively).Conclusion In the setting of revision for primary MoM THA failure, we found definite evidence of the superiority of CTHA over UTHA in terms of improving functional outcomes and decreasing the major orthopaedic complication rate.

Download Full-text

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Cement after Cup Arthroplasty. Long-Term Follow-up*

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) ◽

10.2106/00004623-199601000-00012 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 78 (1) ◽

pp. 87-93 ◽

Cited By ~ 17

Author(s):

STEPHEN A. ASH ◽

JOHN J. CALLAGHAN ◽

RICHARD C. JOHNSTON

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Total Hip ◽

Long Term Follow Up ◽

Cup Arthroplasty

Download Full-text

Mid‐ to Long‐Term Outcomes of Cementless Modular, Fluted, Tapered Stem for Massive Femoral Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Orthopaedic Surgery ◽

10.1111/os.12936 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Kai Zheng ◽

Ning Li ◽

Weicheng Zhang ◽

Yi Zhu ◽

Jun Zhou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Bone Loss ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Femoral Bone ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Total Hip ◽

Tapered Stem

Download Full-text

Long-term outcomes of uncemented or cemented arthroplasty revision following metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty failure: A retrospective observational study with a mean follow-up of 7 years

10.21203/rs.2.20209/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Wenli Chen ◽

Mao Shuai ◽

Jinluan Lin ◽

Baomin Chen ◽

Mingdong Zhao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

High Rate ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Total Hip ◽

Metal On Metal ◽

Cemented Arthroplasty

Abstract Background A high rate of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (MoM-THA) has been well-known. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of patients who had undergone uncemented or cemented THA(UTHA or CTHA) following initial MoM-THA failure. Methods Data from 234 patients (234 hips) who were treated with UTHA or CTHA following initial MoM-THA failure during 2007 - 2018 were retrospectively compared. Follow-up occurred 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and then every 1 year after conversion. The mean follow-up was 84.15 months (67 - 101 months). The primary endpoint was the Harris Hip Scores (HHS); secondary endpoint was the incidence of major orthopaedic complications. Results The HHS demonstrated statistically greater differences in Group CTHA than in Group UTHA 12 months after conversion. From the 12th month after conversion to the final follow-up, CTHA yielded superior functional outcomes than UTHA. Between-group noteworthy differences were observed regarding the rates of re-revision, aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic fracture (10.3% for UTHA vs 2.5% for CTHA, p = 0.015; 16.3% for UTHA vs 5.9% for CTHA, p = 0.011; and 12.0% for UTHA vs 4.2% for CTHA, p = 0.045, respectively). Conclusion In the setting of revision following initial MoM-THA failure, we found definite evidence of the superiority of CTHA over UTHA in regard to improving functional outcomes and decreasing the incidence of major orthopaedic complications.

Download Full-text

Long-term outcomes of uncemented or cemented arthroplasty revision following metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty failure: A retrospective observational study with a mean follow-up of 7 years

10.21203/rs.2.20209/v3 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Wenli Chen ◽

Mao Shuai ◽

Jinluan Lin ◽

Baomin Chen ◽

Mingdong Zhao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

High Rate ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Total Hip ◽

Metal On Metal ◽

Cemented Arthroplasty

Abstract Background: A high rate of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (MoM-THA) has been well-known. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of patients who had undergone uncemented or cemented THA(UTHA or CTHA) following initial MoM-THA failure.Methods: Data from 234 patients (234 hips) who were treated with UTHA or CTHA following initial MoM-THA failure during 2007 - 2018 were retrospectively compared. Follow-up occurred 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and then every 1 year after conversion. The mean follow-up was 84.15 months (67 - 101 months). The primary endpoint was the Harris Hip Scores (HHS); secondary endpoint was the incidence of major orthopaedic complications.Results: The HHS demonstrated statistically greater differences in Group CTHA than in Group UTHA 12 months after conversion. From the 12th month after conversion to the final follow-up, CTHA yielded superior functional outcomes than UTHA. Between-group noteworthy differences were observed regarding the rates of re-revision, aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic fracture (10.3% for UTHA vs 2.5% for CTHA, p = 0.015; 16.3% for UTHA vs 5.9% for CTHA, p = 0.011; and 12.0% for UTHA vs 4.2% for CTHA, p = 0.045, respectively). Conclusion: In the setting of revision following initial MoM-THA failure, we found definite evidence of the superiority of CTHA over UTHA in regard to improving functional outcomes and decreasing the incidence of major orthopaedic complications.

Download Full-text

High survivorship of highly cross-linked polyethylene in revision Total hip Arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up study

Arthroplasty ◽

10.1186/s42836-019-0017-1 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Seung-Jae Lim ◽

Ingwon Yeo ◽

Chan-Woo Park ◽

Kyung-Jae Lee ◽

Byung-Woo Min ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Polyethylene Liner ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Revision Thas ◽

Total Hip ◽

The Mean

Abstract Purpose Highly cross-linked polyethylene has been introduced to decrease osteolysis secondary to polyethylene wear debris generation. However, few long-term data on revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using highly cross-linked polyethylene liners are available. The objective of this study was to determine long-term outcomes of a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner in revision THA. Materials & methods We evaluated 63 revision THAs performed in 63 patients using a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner between April 2000 and February 2005. Of these, nine died and four were lost to follow-up. Thus, the final study cohort consisted of 50 patients (50 hips), including 26 males and 24 females with a mean age of 53 years (range, 27–75 years). Mean follow-up was 11 years (range, 10–14 years). Results The mean Harris hip score improved from 44 points preoperatively to 85 points at the final follow-up. No radiographic evidence of osteolysis was found in any hip. The mean rate of polyethylene liner wear was 0.029 mm/year (range, 0.003 to 0.098 mm/year). A total of 5 hips (10%) required re-revision arthroplasty, including one cup loosening, one recurrent dislocation, and three deep infections. Kaplan-Meier survivorship with an end point of re-revision for any reason was 91.1% and for aseptic cup loosening was 97.9% at 11 years. Conclusion At a minimum of 10 years, the highly cross-linked polyethylene liners showed excellent clinical performance and implant survivorship, and were not associated with osteolysis in our patients with revision THAs.

Download Full-text