scholarly journals Comparison of Pain Control Outcomes between Direct, Continuous Adductor Canal Block and Ultrasonography Guided, Continuous Femoral Nerve Block after Total Knee Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0009
Author(s):  
Seung-Min Na ◽  
Ik-sun Choi ◽  
Jong-Keun Seon ◽  
Eun-Kyoo Song

Background: Purpose of this study was to compare the effects of direct, continuous adductor canal block (ACB) and ultrasonography guided, continuous femoral nerve block (FNB) on postoperative pain control, strength of the knee extensor, walking ability, and related complications after primary total knee arthroplasty. Methods: Between November 2018 and February 2019, 107 patients underwent primary total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. Forty eight patients received ACB and the other 59 received FNB for postoperative pain control. After the surgery, the patients received adductor canal or femoral nerve block via a catheter. 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine was administered initially, followed by continuous injection of 4 mL per hour. ACB was done before capsule repair by orthopedic surgeon and FNB was performed after the surgery. Data were prospectively collected out from these 107 patients. To evaluate postoperative pain control, the numerical rating scale scores at rest and during range of motion were recorded. To evaluate quadriceps strength, motor grade by manual muscle testing was measured. Walking ability was assessed by first weight bearing day and walking distance (steps). We also evaluated analgesic consumption using morphine equivalent and recorded related complications of peripheral nerve block. Results: No significant intergroup difference was observed in the numerical rating scale scores at rest and during range of motion on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. ACB group had significantly greater quadriceps strength than did the FNB group, as evaluated by manual muscle testing on postoperative days 1. However, there was no significant difference onpostoperative days 2, 3, 4, and 5. These two groups showed no differences in walking ability in terms of first weight bearing day and walking distance. No significant intergroup difference was observed in analgesic consumption. Conclusions: The groups showed no difference in postoperative pain control. ACB showed better motor grade on postoperative day one compared with femoral nerve block, but which was similar in days after postoperative day one.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932199663
Author(s):  
Mustafa Kaçmaz ◽  
Zeynep Yüksel Turhan

Introduction: Femoral Nerve Block (FNB) and Adductor Canal Block (ACB) methods, which are regional analgesic techniques, are successfully used in postoperative pain control after total knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to compare adductor canal block method that was preoperatively used and femoral nerve block method in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who underwent spinal anesthesia in terms of factors effecting patient satisfaction and determine whether these methods were equally effective or not. Methods: A total of 80 patients between the ages of 60 and 75 who were in the American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status of I-III were prospectively included in this randomized study. Patients (n = 40) who received FNB were called Group FNB and patients (n = 40) who received Adductor Canal Block were called Group ACB. Results: Although mean postoperative VAS values were lower in FNB group only in the first hour (p = 0.02) there was no significant difference between the groups in the third, fifth, seventh, ninth, 12th and 24th hours (p≥0.05). Although Bromage scores were lower in FNB group in the first, second, third, fourth and fifth hours there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p≥0.05). When mobilization time, patient satisfaction level, time of first analgesia, intraoperative sedation need, and recovery time of sensorial block were compared no statistically significant difference was found (p≥0.05). Discussion: When ACB and FNB that are used for postoperative analgesia in patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty are compared in terms of factors affecting patient satisfaction it is observed that they result in the same level (non-inferiority) of patient satisfaction. Conclusion: We recommend the routine use of ACB method with FNB in total knee arthroplasty. More studies focusing especially on measuring patient satisfaction are needed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1696-1703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabil M. Elkassabany ◽  
Sean Antosh ◽  
Moustafa Ahmed ◽  
Charles Nelson ◽  
Craig Israelite ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document