The Atlanta Protocol: Immune Tolerance Induction in Pediatric Patients with Hemophilia a and Inhibitors on Emicizumab

Abstract Introduction: The formation of neutralizing anti-factor VIII (fVIII) antibodies, called inhibitors, is a challenging complication in hemophilia A care. While novel non-factor therapies significantly reduce bleeding symptoms in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors, the absence of fVIII tolerance remains unchanged. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the hemostatic efficacy and safety of bypassing agents necessary for the management of breakthrough bleeds in patients with inhibitors on these novel therapies. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) remains the primary method for eradicating inhibitors and restoring the hemostatic response to fVIII. Here we report on the response to ITI in pediatric patients following initiation of the bispecific humanized monoclonal antibody Emicizumab. Methods: Patients between the ages of 1 - 11 years old with hemophilia A and an active inhibitor (≥0.6 Bethesda Units (BU)/mL) treated at the Emory Pediatric Hemophilia Treatment Center were included in this analysis. In general, ITI was initiated after four weekly loading doses of Emicizumab with standard or extended half-life recombinant (rfVIII) or plasma-derived (pdfVIII) fVIII at 100 units/kg three times per week. Factor choice was determined by the fVIII product used for the ITI attempt prior to initiation of Emicizumab or a standard half-life third generation rfVIII product if no prior ITI attempts. FVIII pharmacokinetics during ITI including the estimated fVIII half-life, fVIII incremental recovery of expected, and inhibitor titers were measured with chromogenic-based assays using bovine reagents. Bleeding symptoms and treatment regimens for bleeds/procedures were also monitored. Results: Eight patients are currently receiving ITI according to this Atlanta Protocol. Details regarding this cohort are outlined in Table 1. Three of the 8 patients required central venous access for ITI fVIII infusions. These eight patients have historical peak inhibitor titers, defined as the highest inhibitor titer prior to this ITI regimen, ranging from 2.0 - 198 BU/mL. Four patients have just recently started ITI. The other 4 patients (patients 1, 2, 4, and 5) have been treated with Emicizumab and ITI for a median duration of 15 weeks (range 13-18 weeks). Two of the 4 patients are on ITI with a standard half-life third generation rfVIII product, 1 is on a standard half-life third generation B domain deleted (BDD) rfVIII product, and 1 is on an extended half-life (EHL) rfVIII-Fc fusion product. Their last measured inhibitor titers after initiation of ITI range from 0.3 - 3.7 chromogenic BU (CBU). All inhibitor titers declined with the start of ITI, and none of the 4 patients experienced an amnestic response (Figure 1). The fVIII incremental recovery improved in 3 of the 4 patients from a median of 30% of expected (range 17-69%) prior to Emicizumab with ITI to 85% of expected (range 67-85%) at the last clinical evaluation. The 1 patient remaining has an fVIII incremental recovery <10% of expected at the last clinical evaluation. Only one patient has required treatment with a single dose of recombinant activated factor VII (rfVIIa) for a right knee hemarthrosis during ITI without complication. There were 3 additional mild bleeding symptoms in 2 patients that did not require intervention including 1 trauma-induced forehead hematoma that self-resolved and 2 episodes self-resolving epistaxis lasting <5 minutes. Two of the 4 patients reported no bleeding symptoms. There were no episodes of thrombosis or thrombotic microangiopathy. Conclusions: This is the first report detailing the Atlanta Protocol for ITI in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors receiving Emicizumab prophylaxis. Although early, these results suggest that ITI can be safely administered in these patients and is able to achieve continued improvement in clinical indicators of tolerance. Disclosures Batsuli: Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board; Octapharma: Other: Advisory Board. Zimowski:National Hemophilia Association/Shire: Other: Funding for clinical fellowship in Hemostasis/Thrombosis. Meeks:Bioverativ: Other: Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; CSL Behring: Other: Advisory Board; Catalyst Biosciences: Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board; HEMA Biologics: Other: Advisory Board; Shire: Other: Advisory Board; Pfizer: Research Funding. Sidonio:Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Biomarin: Other: Advisory Board; Novo Nordisk: Other: Advisory Board; Octapharma: Other: Advisory Board; Grifols: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Uniqure: Other: Advisory Board; CSL Behring: Other: Advisory Board; Shire: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kedrion: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Immune Tolerance Induction Using Rfviiifc (Eloctate)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3531.3531 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3531-3531 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Lynn M. Malec ◽

Margaret V Ragni ◽

Janna M. Journeycake ◽

Michelle Alabek

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Immune Tolerance ◽

Half Life ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Central Venous Access ◽

Tolerance Induction ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Immune Tolerance Induction

Abstract Introduction: Inhibitor formation affects approximately 30% of individuals with severe hemophilia A. The eradication of inhibitors using immune tolerance induction (ITI) remains the mainstay of therapy, although typically requires daily high-dose factor VIII via a port for up to a year. Extended half-life recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc, Eloctate¨) has a half-life extension 1.5-fold longer than standard recombinant FVIII (rFVIII), reducing treatment frequency, and also induces regulatory T cell response to FVIII in animal models. We hypothesized that rFVIIIFc would provide more effective ITI, specifically shortening ITI, than rFVIII. We describe ITI with rFVIIIFc in three patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods: Immune tolerance induction was initiated with rFVIIIFc (Eloctate) in three children with severe hemophilia A and an anti-FVIII inhibitor. Dosing was per MD discretion with family agreement, and performed by central venous access device or intravenous infusion via heplock. Follow-up was scheduled every 6-8 weeks, with planned determination of FVIII half-life once the anti-FVIII fell to <0.6 B.U. Tolerance was a priori defined as achieving anti-FVIII <0.6 B.U. and half-life, t½ >6 hours. FVIII half-life was determined by one-stage FVIII:C assay on citrate samples drawn pre- and 10 minutes, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-infusion of a single dose of rFVIIIFc. Once a t½ >6 hours was documented, incremental reduction to 50 IU/kg every other day or three times weekly, once there was evidence of maintenance of inhibitor neutralization and a >6 hour FVIII:C half-life. Results: Immune tolerance induction was initiated with rFVIIIFc at a dose of 100-200 IU/kg rFVIIIFc via central venous access device every other day or three times weekly per MD discretion in three children with severe hemophilia A and in anti-FVIII inhibitor > 5 B.U. (Table 1). Two patients had F8 genetic testing. In two patients, Pt 1 and Pt 3, this was the initial ITI course, and in the third child (Pt 2) this was salvage ITI after failing to achieve tolerance due to noncompliance with daily rFVIII ITI taper regimen. In two rFVIIIFc ITI was begun when anti-FVIII was < 10 B.U. Historic peak titers were 16-422 B.U. The time to anti-FVIII tolerance was 4-12 weeks Discussion: Immune tolerance induction was successful in three children with inhibitors using rFVIIIFc, including a child previously failing rFVIII ITI. The time to anti-FVIII=0 was 4-12 weeks, significantly shorter than with current rFVIII ITI. There were no adverse effects. These data indicate that rFVIIIFc safely and effectively induced immune tolerance to FVIII in children with inhibitors. Whether ITI may be accomplished more rapidly with rFVIIIFc, and the optimal dose for ITI will require prospective studies. A prospective observational study of rFVIIIFc ITI pre- and post-ITI T cell responses in children with hemophilia and inhibitors, the H emophilia I nhibitor R esponse to E loctate (HIRE) Study, is underway. Table 1. Immune Tolerance Induction with rFVIIIFc in Hemophilia A Inhibitor Patients Patient (Pt) Hemophilia Severity F8 Gene Mutation Age at Anti-FVIII Detection Peak Anti-FVIII Titer Initial ITI Dose Time toAnti-FVIII = 0 Current Anti-FVIII 1 <0.01 IU/ml Intron 22 inversion 13 months 32 B.U. 200 IU/kg QOD 12 weeks 0 B.U. 2 < 0.01 IU/ml Exon 18 nonsense variant 9 months 422 B.U. 200 IU/kg 3x/week 4 weeks 0 B.U. 3 <0.01 IU/ml Not available 10 years 16 B.U. 100 IU/kg QOD 11 weeks 0 B.U. Disclosures Malec: Baxter: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding. Ragni:Pfizer: Research Funding; Tacere Benitec: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Dimension: Research Funding; Vascular Medicine Institute: Research Funding; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; SPARK: Research Funding; Biomarin: Research Funding; Genentech Roche: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding. Journeycake:CSL, Baxalta, NovoNordisk: Consultancy; ATHN: Research Funding; Biogen: Speakers Bureau; ATHN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Durability of ITI Utilizing Rfviiifc

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3793.3793 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3793-3793

Author(s):

Margaret V. Ragni ◽

Lynn M. Malec ◽

Janna M. Journeycake

Keyword(s):

Immune Tolerance ◽

Half Life ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Tolerance Induction ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Immune Tolerance Induction ◽

Viii Inhibitor ◽

Inhibitor Titer

Introduction: The eradication of inhibitors using immune tolerance induction (ITI) remains the mainstay of therapy in patients with severe hemophilia A who develop inhibitors. The long-acting recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein, rFVIIIFc (Eloctate™), which is safe and effective in the prevention and treatment of bleeding events, may promote tolerance to FVIII as shown in preclinical animal models and an inhibitor prone child, as Fc suppresses immunoregulatory Tcells to proteins to which Fc is attached. We therefore previously hypothesized rFVIIIFc would provide effective ITI, specifically shortening and simplifying ITI, and have previously described successful inhibitor eradication in three patients. Long-term follow-up data after successful ITI in patients with severe hemophilia remains limited. In the International Immune Tolerance Induction study, at 1-year follow-up, 6 of 66 subjects who had achieved tolerance demonstrated evidence of relapse at a median of 9.5 months. Of these 6 subjects, 1 had a measurable inhibitor titer and 5 had reduced FVIII recovery. We aim to provide follow-up data on our cohort of patients who had successful inhibitor eradication utilizing rFVIIIFc for ITI. Methods: Immune tolerance induction was initiated in three patients with severe hemophilia A and anti-VIII >5 B.U., in two as initial ITI (Pt. 1, 3), and one as salvage (Pt. 2) after failing to achieve ITI with standard rFVIII due to poor compliance. Follow-up was scheduled every 6-8 weeks, with planned determination of FVIII half-life once the anti-FVIII fell to <0.6 B.U. Tolerance was a priori defined as achieving anti-FVIII <0.6 B.U., FVIII recovery of at least 60%, and half-life (t½) >6 hours. Once a t½ >6 hours was documented, incremental reduction to rFVIIIFc occurred. Patients continued to be followed by their local HTC as per standard of care. Results: ITI was initiated with rFVIIIFc at a dose of 100-200 IU/kg rFVIIIFc every other day or three times weekly per MD discretion. The time to initial anti-FVIII <0.6 B.U. was 4-12 weeks. Patient 1 and 2 were able to achieve tolerance, with a FVIII recovery of at least 60%, and half-life (t½) >6 hours, at weeks 18 and 17, respectively, after initiation of ITI. Patient 3 has improved but is not yet fully tolerized, as evidenced by 57% recovery and a t½ of approximately 7 hours. Anti-VIII inhibitor titers remain negative at 15, 16 and 15 months, from the initiation of ITI in patients 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Patients 1 and 2 have been able to decrease their post ITI prophylaxis dosing regimen to 80 IU/kg and 65 IU/kg three times a week while maintaining a FVIII trough of >1%. No patients were maintained on bypassing prophylaxis during ITI and no patients have experienced hemarthroses or other major bleeding event since the initiation of ITI. Discussion: Immune tolerance induction was successful in three children with inhibitors using rFVIIIFc, including a child previously failing rFVIII ITI. The time to anti-FVIII=0 was 4-12 weeks, significantly shorter than with current rFVIII ITI. At a mean duration of follow up of 15.3 months, all patients achieved an anti-VIII inhibitor titer of 0 B.U. Repeat pharmacokinetics studies will be available at planned subsequent follow-up visit. To date, these data indicate that rFVIIIFc safely and effectively induced immune tolerance to FVIII in three children with inhibitors, and has provided durable and continuing immune tolerance to FVIII. Whether rFVIIIFc ITI will be successful and durable in a larger cohort of children with severe hemophilia A will require prospective studies. A prospective observational study of rFVIIIFc ITI pre- and post-ITI T cell responses in children with hemophilia and inhibitors, the Hemophilia Inhibitor Response to Eloctate (HIRE) Study, has begun recruitment. Disclosures Ragni: SPARK: Research Funding; Shire: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Biomarin: Consultancy; Biogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Baxalta: Research Funding; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tacere Benitec: Consultancy; Vascular Medicine Institute: Research Funding; OPKO: Research Funding. Malec:Vascular Medicine Institute: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding; Baxalta: Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy. Journeycake:CSL: Consultancy; Biogen: Consultancy; Baxalta/Shire: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Natural History Of Inhibitor Recurrence Following Successful Immune Tolerance Induction

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1106.1106 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1106-1106 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Ana G. Antun ◽

Paul Monahan ◽

Marilyn J. Manco-Johnson ◽

Michael Callaghan ◽

Guy Young ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Immune Tolerance ◽

Half Life ◽

Research Funding ◽

Tolerance Induction ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Immune Tolerance Induction ◽

Baxter Healthcare ◽

Inhibitor Titer

Abstract Introduction The formation of Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitory antibodies is a major complication of hemophilia A. Currently immune tolerance induction (ITI) is successful in up to 70% of patients. Outside of the International Immune Tolerance Registry, where 6 of 128 patients had a recurrent inhibitor between 1 and 6 years, little is known about the probability of inhibitor recurrence following successful ITI. Objective To determine the probability of inhibitor recurrence and the influence of adherence to post-ITI prophylaxis on inhibitor recurrence following successful ITI. Methods All persons with hemophilia A (FVIII level < 50%) who completed ITI (defined as inhibitor titer <0.6 BU/ml) between 1/1/1998 and 8/15/2010 at 12 U.S. Hemophilia Treatment Centers were identified. Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained through review of subject medical records and included age at start of ITI, race, ethnicity, hemophilia severity, peak inhibitor titer prior to the start of ITI and ITI regimen. For those subjects where tolerance was confirmed with measurement of FVIII half-life > 6 hours and/or FVIII recovery > 66% in addition to inhibitor titer < 0.6 BU/ml, information was also collected on post-ITI prophylaxis regimen, adherence to post-ITI prophylaxis, and the presence of a recurrent inhibitor titer (≥ 0.6 BU/ml) or last inhibitor titer prior to 8/15/2011. Adherence during the 6 months prior to inhibitor recurrence or last inhibitor titer was determined by review of pharmacy and infusion logs compared with prescribed treatment regimen. Follow-up time started when the subject was considered tolerized (normalized half-life or recovery if half-life not performed) and ended at the time of inhibitor recurrence or the last recorded inhibitor titer. Estimates of the probability of remaining inhibitor-free at 1, 3 and 5 years were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. The association between adherence (completing >80% of prescribed infusions vs. < 80% of prescribed infusions) and inhibitor recurrence was assessed using the chi-square test. Results Eighty-three male subjects were enrolled. The median age at start of ITI was 3.3 years (range: 0.08 - 39). The majority of the subjects were white (73%) and non-Hispanic (73.5%). Seventy-one (85.6%) had severe hemophilia. The median peak inhibitor titer was 8.5 BU/ml (range: 0.6 - 950). Four subjects (5%) had a prior unsuccessful course of ITI. FVIII alone was used in 85% of subjects. Sixty-seven (80.7%) met criteria for tolerance and 64 had follow-up data available, with a median follow up time of 3.4 years (range: 0.08-12.4). Forty-four subjects (68.7%) remained tolerant without a recurrent inhibitor titer after a median 4.7 years (range: 0.25-12.4) of follow-up. Twenty subjects (31.3%) had at least one inhibitor titer ≥ 0.6 BU/ml after a median of 1.6 years (range 0.08-5.7). The probability of recurrent inhibitor at 1 year is 0.15 (95% CI: [0.05, 0.20]); at 3 years is 0.30 (95% CI: [0.2, 0.4]) and 5 years is 0.35 (95% CI: [0.2, 0.5]) (Figure 1). Four subjects discontinued post-ITI prophylaxis anywhere from 6 months to greater than 6 years after tolerance was achieved, of whom 2 (50%) developed a recurrent inhibitor. Of those that remained on post-ITI prophylaxis, 41 subjects (64.1%) were adherent (took >80% of prescribed infusions) to their post-ITI prophylaxis regimen, of whom 13 (31.7%) developed a recurrent inhibitor. Twenty-three (35.9%) who were non-adherent (took <80% of the prescribed infusions) of which 7 (30.4%) subjects developed a recurrent inhibitor; no statistically significant association was found between adherence and inhibitor-free status (p=0.92). Conclusion ITI is currently the most effective treatment to eradicate FVIII inhibitors, however 5 years after completion, 30-35% of patients will have at least one inhibitor titer ≥ 0.6 BU/ml. A recurrent inhibitor is unlikely after 5 years. Adherence to post-ITI prophylaxis does not appear to be a major driver of inhibitor recurrence. It is imperative to elucidate the factors that influence the durability of successful ITI to improve quality of life and cost of treatment in these patients. Disclosures: Monahan: Baxter: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, travel support, travel support Other; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Prolor Biotech: Research Funding; Asklepios: Consultancy, Research Funding, travel support Other. Manco-Johnson:Eisai: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen Idec: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxter BioScience: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer HealthCare: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Carpenter:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kruse-Jarres:Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy; Biogen IDEC: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy; Kedrion: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Baxter Healthcare: Consultancy. Ragni:Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Baxter: Research Funding; Tacere Benitec: Consultancy; Smith Kline Glaxo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kempton:Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Baxter Healthcare: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Immune Tolerance Induction with Simoctocog Alfa (Nuwiq®) in Six Patients with Severe Haemophilia a and FVIII Inhibitors

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-118041 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5037-5037

Author(s):

Neha Bhatnagar ◽

Kate Khair ◽

Ri Liesner ◽

Alice Wilkinson ◽

Larisa Belyanskaya

Keyword(s):

Immune Tolerance ◽

Half Life ◽

Research Funding ◽

Poor Prognosis ◽

Case Series ◽

Tolerance Induction ◽

Haemophilia A ◽

Severe Haemophilia ◽

Immune Tolerance Induction ◽

Inhibitor Titre

Abstract Introduction and Objective: Inhibitors to coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) are the most serious complication of haemophilia A treatment. Previously untreated patients (PUPs) are at the greatest risk of inhibitors, which generally occur within the first 20 exposure days (ED) to FVIII. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only clinically proven strategy for eradication of inhibitors. We present a case series of six PUPs with severe haemophilia A and inhibitors who underwent ITI with simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®), a 4th generation human cell-line-derived recombinant FVIII approved for treatment of haemophilia A. Materials and Methods: Six male PUPs with severe haemophilia A who developed FVIII inhibitors after treatment with simoctocog alfa were started on ITI with simoctocog alfa. Primarily, we assessed the success of simoctocog alfa in patients with inhibitors. Success of ITI was determined based on undetectable inhibitor titre (< 0.6 BU/ml), FVIII recovery ≥ 66% and half-life ≥ 6 hours. Secondary objectives were to assess bleeding rate, tolerability and safety in patients with inhibitors treated with simoctocog alfa ITI. Results: The age of the patients at the start of ITI ranged from 8 to 186 months. Four of the patients were Caucasian, and two were African. All patients had a F8 mutation associated with high risk of ITI failure and two patients had an additional risk factor for ITI failure. The number of EDs prior to inhibitor development ranged from 9 to 33, and the peak inhibitor titre ranged from 0.9 to 114 BU. For ITI, five patients were treated with 100 IU/kg simoctocog alfa daily, and one with 90 IU/kg every other day. One patient achieved complete tolerisation and is now on prophylaxis at normal doses, having achieved an undetectable inhibitor titre after 9 months. This was despite an inhibitor titre ≥ 10 BU/mL at ITI start, which is considered a poor prognosis factor for ITI success. Three other patients achieved an undetectable inhibitor titre after 1, 6 and 18 months of ITI, and FVIII recovery has normalised but half-life remains short and they are on weaning doses as the half-life extends. One patient discontinued ITI with simoctocog alfa after 15 months due to an increasing inhibitor level. This patient was 15 years old at ITI start, and older age is associated with poor ITI outcome. Additionally, his haemophilia A was untreated for 15 years, during which time he developed severe arthropathy. One patient, who started ITI 3 months ago, has an ongoing inhibitor titre and continues on ITI with simoctocog alfa. Conclusions: In a case series of six patients treated with simoctocog alfa for ITI, who all had poor prognosis factors for ITI success, four patients (67%) to date have achieved an undetectable inhibitor titre. These data suggest that ITI with simoctocog alfa may be an effective treatment approach in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Disclosures Khair: Shire, SOBI, Pfizer, Roche, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma: Speakers Bureau; shire, SOBI, Pfizer, Roche: Research Funding. Liesner:Roche: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Other: Clinical study investigator for NuProtect Study (Octapharma sponsored), Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau. Belyanskaya:Octapharma AG: Employment.

Download Full-text

What is the role of an extended half-life product in immune tolerance induction in a patient with severe hemophilia A and high-titer inhibitors?

Hematology ◽

10.1182/asheducation-2016.1.648 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 2016 (1) ◽

pp. 648-649 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Maissaa Janbain ◽

Steven Pipe

Keyword(s):

Immune Tolerance ◽

Half Life ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

High Titer ◽

Tolerance Induction ◽

High Dose ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Immune Tolerance Induction ◽

History Of

Abstract A 10-year-old boy presents with a history of severe hemophilia A and high-titer inhibitor that had failed high-dose immune tolerance induction (ITI) with a recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) product and a plasma-derived FVIII product. You are asked by his mother whether he should be tried on ITI with an extended half-life product, in particular, consideration of a rFVIIIFc concentrate.

Download Full-text

Economic Impact of Immune Tolerance Induction (ITI) with Recombinant Factor VIII Fc Fusion Protein (rFVIIIFc) Compared to Conventional Recombinant Factor VIII (rFVIII)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114993 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3520-3520

Author(s):

Nanxin Li ◽

Koo Wilson ◽

Marc Botteman ◽

Daniel Nicoloso ◽

Sangeeta Krishnan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Factor Viii ◽

Immune Tolerance ◽

Research Funding ◽

Impact Analysis ◽

Budget Impact ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Case Reports ◽

Tolerance Induction ◽

Immune Tolerance Induction ◽

Clinical Profiles

Abstract Introduction: Hemophilia A results from a clotting protein factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency, which leads to the need for the use of exogenous FVIII. Such therapy is effective unless alloantibodies (inhibitors) develop and render FVIII replacement ineffective. Patients with high-titer inhibitors may try to eradicate the presence of these inhibitors by undergoing ITI, an often costly process that requires the prolonged use of frequent doses of FVIII to induce FVIII antigen-specific tolerance. There is no consensus on the best approach to achieve tolerance and no product has been approved by any regulatory agency for ITI treatment in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors. The Fc portion of rFVIIIFc has shown immunomodulatory properties in mice, and chart reviews and case reports suggest that tolerization with rFVIIIFc in first-attempt ITI patients can potentially be achieved rapidly (i.e., ≤18 months) and therefore may possibly offer cost savings compared to conventional rFVIII. This analysis assessed the economic consequences and budget impact of using rFVIIIFc vs. conventional rFVIII for first-attempt immune tolerance induction (ITI) in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Methods: A literature-based model was developed to estimate the effect of rFVIIIFc vs conventional rFVIII on drug cost of first-attempt ITI, based on modelled ITI duration and outcome (rates and time to ITI success or failure) for US patients with varying clinical profiles (e.g., historical peak titer, FVIII dose) over a 3-year period. In the model, at any given time after ITI initiation (on either rFVIIIFc or rFVIII), a patient was categorized as ongoing ITI, post-ITI as success, or post-ITI as failure. The duration and outcomes for patients treated with rFVIIIFc ITI were based on observed data for first-attempt ITI patients with varied clinical profiles and ITI regimens from in chart reviews and case reports (n = 9). In the absence of direct head-to-head observations, the duration and outcome of ITI for the exact same patients in a scenario in which they received rFVIII (instead of rFVIIIFc) at the same doses were estimated indirectly using a previously published regression model (Bojke et al. 2009, Value in Health, 12(7), A378-A379) based on data for 113 patients from international and national registries that adjusts for historical and pre-ITI titer levels, time from inhibitor diagnosis to ITI start, and ITI factor dose. To place the cost comparison results in the perspective of a third-party US payer, a budget impact analysis was undertaken on a population of typical hemophilia A patients (after adjusting for patient characteristics) who are embarking on first-attempt ITI in a plan of 10 million insured members. In this analysis, the number of patients starting ITI each year was assumed constant, and patients who successfully eradicated inhibitors with ITI would transition back to FVIII prophylaxis. Results: The model predicted that, compared to rFVIII, rFVIIIFc would result in a reduction in estimated time to ITI success (rFVIIIFc: 9.43 months, rFVIII: 16.80 months), increased success probability at 20 months (rFVIIIFc: 67%, rFVIII: 25%), and lower 3-year per-patient costs (rFVIIIFc: $1,709,000, rFVIII: $3,630,000), respectively. In the budget impact analysis for a US health plan of 10 million insured members, 11.2 patients were expected to be newly diagnosed hemophilia A patients, among whom 1.17 patients were expected to develop inhibitors to FVIII and initiate ITI each year. By year 3, the predicted number of successful ITI patients increased by 23% and the budget savings for the plan were $103,738 per patient per year (for the ~1 patient who started ITI each year) after the inclusion of rFVIIIFc for ITI and subsequent prophylaxis when patients successfully eradicated inhibitors. Conclusions: Based on this mathematical economic model of first-attempt ITI patients, the modeled faster time to tolerization with rFVIIIFc vs. rFVIII, resulted in estimated per-patient and overall budget savings in ITI from a US payer perspective. Current prospective studies (e.g. verITI-8) will provide additional evidence on the efficacy of rFVIIIFc for ITI in Hemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Disclosures Li: Bioverativ: Employment. Wilson:SOBI: Employment. Botteman:Daiichi Sankyo Incorporated: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pharmerit International: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Other: Provided consulting to Bioverativ, Research Funding. Nicoloso:Bioverativ: Other: an employee of Pharmerit, which provided consulting to Bioverativ. Krishnan:Bioverativ: Employment. Su:Bioverativ: Employment.

Download Full-text

Rescue and Primary ITI in Children and Adults with a Single FVIII/VWF Product

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1174.1174 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1174-1174

Author(s):

Louis M. Aledort ◽

Johannes Oldenburg ◽

Elena Santagostino ◽

Victor Jimenez Yuste

Keyword(s):

Immune Tolerance ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Tolerance Induction ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Immune Tolerance Induction ◽

Optimal Intervention ◽

International Multicenter Study ◽

International Multicenter ◽

Partial Success

Abstract Abstract 1174 Introduction Inhibitors are the most serious complication of hemophilia A (HA) treatment. Current optimal intervention for inhibitor eradication is immune tolerance induction (ITI), the goal of which is for the patient to resume therapy with FVIII. Basic and clinical research have strongly supported that VWF containing FVIII concentrates may be less immunogenic and are effective in primary ITI as well as for rescue ITI for those who fail to develop tolerance with recombinant proteins. Objective To assess the outcome of rescue and primary ITI in children (<18 years old) and adults with a single FVIII/VWF product (Fanhdi®, Grifols, Barcelona, Spain). Methods Retrospective data from HA patients (FVIII< 2%) with inhibitors from 22 centers in Spain, Italy and Germany, who underwent primary or rescue ITI with FVIII/VWF concentrate were evaluated. Success, partial success and failure were defined based on the criteria of the consensus recommendations of the 2006 International ITI Workshop. Results The largest international multicenter study on ITI using a single product has evaluated 41 cases of primary ITI (32 children and 9 adults) and 19 cases of rescue ITI (17 children and 2 adults). Conclusion The response rate of 87% (CS+PS) in primary ITI exceeds that previously reported with any product class. The response rate (CS+PS) of 74% in the higher risk profile of rescue ITI is what one might expect for primary ITI. These excellent results, using a single VWF containing FVIII product, should encourage the use of this class of product for immune tolerance. Acknowledgments: The authors acknowledge Grifols financial support of the study. The authors also acknowledge Drs Jeffrey Spears and Roser Peiro, Grifols, for their editorial assistance in preparation of the abstract. Disclosures: Aledort: Grifols: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria; Kedrion: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Baxter: DSMB, DSMB Other; Octapharma: DSMB, DSMB Other. Off Label Use: This FVIII is not licensed for ITI - nor is any other product. Oldenburg:d and e: Baxter, Bayer, Biotest, CSL-Behring, Grifols, Inspiration, NovoNordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer e: Biogen IDec, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Research Funding. Santagostino:Bayer, Baxter, Pfizer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Biotest, Kedrion and Grifols: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer, Baxter, Bayer, CSL Behring, Kedrion, Grifols and Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk and Pfizer: Research Funding. Jimenez Yuste:Grifols, Baxter, Pfizer, NovoNordisk: Advisory Board Other, Consultancy.

Download Full-text