scholarly journals The use of luspatercept for thalassemia in adults

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 326-333
Author(s):  
Maria Domenica Cappellini ◽  
Ali T. Taher

Abstract Luspatercept is an activin receptor ligand trap that has been shown to enhance late-stage erythropoiesis in animal models of β-thalassemia. A multicenter, international, phase 2 dose-finding study was initiated in adult patients with β-thalassemia, either non–transfusion-dependent thalassemia (NTDT) or transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT). Positive results of the phase 2 study paved the way to a randomized phase 3 clinical trial (BELIEVE) to assess the efficacy and safety of luspatercept. The BELIEVE trial is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Three hundred thirty-six patients aged ≥18 years with TDT (regularly transfused, 6-20 red blood cell units within 24 weeks before randomization) were included in the trial. Patients received luspatercept or placebo subcutaneously every 21 days for ≥48 weeks and best supportive care. Forty-eight of 224 patients (21.4%) in the luspatercept group achieved the primary end points (≥33% reduction in transfusion burden) compared with those in the placebo group (4.5%; P < .001). Moreover, more patients had a ≥33% reduction in transfusion burden during any rolling 12-week interval (70.5% vs 29.5%) or any 24-week interval (41.1% vs 2.7%) with luspatercept than with the placebo. Transfusion independence was achieved by 11% of patients in the luspatercept group. Transient adverse events were more frequent with luspatercept than with placebo, but were manageable. Luspatercept was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2019 and by the European Medicines Agency in 2020. The luspatercept trial is registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov at #NCT01749540 and the BELIEVE trial at #NCT02604433.

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.E. Coleman ◽  
O.P. Purohit ◽  
C. Black ◽  
J.J. F. Vinholes ◽  
K. Schlosser ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 98 (S9) ◽  
pp. 257-258
Author(s):  
Jan H. Hulshof ◽  
Pieter Vermey

From all methods of the treatment of tinnitus, medical, masking, surgery, electrical stimulation and psychological, we believe a reliable medical treatment would be preferable because it is easy to apply. An immense variety of drugs have been used for the treatment of tinnitus (Vernon, 1977). The most reliable drugs so far on tinnitus are intravenous procaine and lidocaine (Bárány, 1935; Lewy, 1937; Melding et al., 1978; Martin and Colman, 1980; Israel et al., 1982). The fact that these drugs cannot be given orally because of the poor biological availability after oral administration, is a great disadvantage. In view of the important pharmaco-therapeutic role of lidocaine as an anti-arrhythmic drug, considerable research has been devoted to drugs with comparable anti-arrhythmic properties but permitting oral administration. This work produced tocainide (Smith, 1981), which showed a certain degree of effect on tinnitus as well (Emmett and Shea, 1980; Cathcart, 1982). Before starting a randomized double-blind controlled trial to assess the effect on tinnitus of tocainide, we studied the effect of several doses of tocainide HCl on tinnitus in order to select an appropriate dosage. Nineteen patients with obstructive tinnitus of various aetiologies were admitted to the study. There were 10 women and nine men. Their mean age was 54 years (range 22–67 years). Tocainide was administered in five different doses in a single-blind controlled trial. To be able to judge the effect under steady conditions, each dose was given for four days, as shown in Table I. On the fourth day of each period the patients had to record the degree of impediment caused by the tinitus on a six-point scale (Table II). They were also asked to report all sideeffects.


2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 617-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannu Naukkarinen ◽  
Roope Raassina ◽  
Jukka Penttinen ◽  
Antti Ahokas ◽  
Riitta Jokinen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document