Utility of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in assessing asthma control following inhaled corticosteroid treatment

Author(s):  
Anant Mohan ◽  
V. Kavitha ◽  
Karan Madan ◽  
Vijay Hadda ◽  
Randeep Guleria ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 012-017
Author(s):  
Shiroshita Akihiro ◽  
Tanaka Yu ◽  
Nakashima Kei ◽  
Shiraishi Atsushi ◽  
Matsui Hiroki ◽  
...  

Introduction: There is currently no strategy for identifying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients whose pulmonary function could benefit from inhaled corticosteroids. We investigated whether a 28-day regime of inhaled corticosteroids improved pulmonary function test results among COPD patients with a fractional exhaled nitric oxide concentration > 35 parts per billion. Methods: This single-centre one-arm pre–post trial included COPD patients with a fractional exhaled nitric oxide concentration > 35 parts per billion treated at our institution from September 2018 to August 2019. Patients were administered budesonide (200 μg, 8 puffs daily) for 28 days. The primary outcome measure was the difference between the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at baseline and after 28 days of inhaled corticosteroid treatment. Secondary outcomes included differences in COPD Assessment Test scores, %FEV1, and that between the percent forced vital capacity (%FVC) at baseline and after 28 days of treatment. Results: Twenty patients completed the 28-day inhaled corticosteroid regime. The mean difference in FEV1 between day 1 and day 28 was 340 mL (95% confidence interval: −100 to 770 mL; p = 0.122). The mean differences in secondary outcomes were: %FVC, −0.16% (95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.84 to 2.53%; p = 0.905); %FEV1, 1.63% (95%CI: −4.56 to 7.81%; p = 0.589); COPD Assessment Test score, −2.50 (95%CI: −5.72 to 0.72; p = 0.121). Conclusion: The 28-day course of inhaled corticosteroids yielded no significant difference in FEV1 for COPD patients with a fractional exhaled nitric oxide concentration > 35 parts per billion. Trial registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network Center, UMIN000034005. Registered 3 September 2018, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000038557


2015 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 572-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sohyoung Yang ◽  
Joohyun Park ◽  
Youn Kyung Lee ◽  
Heon Kim ◽  
Youn-Soo Hahn

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano ◽  
Emanuela Resta ◽  
Massimiliano Povero ◽  
Corrado Pelaia ◽  
Mariella D'Amato ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Severe asthma is burdened by frequent exacerbations and use of oral corticosteroids, which worsen patients’ health and increase healthcare spending. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and economic impact of switching from omalizumab to mepolizumab in patients eligible for both biologics, but not optimally controlled by omalizumab.Methods: We retrospectively enrolled uncontrolled severe asthmatic patients, referred to seven asthma clinics in Italy, who switched from omalizumab to mepolizumab during the last two years. Clinical, functional, and laboratory information included blood eosinophil count, asthma control test, spirometry, serum IgE, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, oral corticosteroids intake, use of controller and rescue drugs, exacerbations/hospitalizations, visits and diagnostic exams. Within the perspective of Italian National Health System, a pre- and post-mepolizumab 12-month standardized total cost per patient was calculated.Results: 33 patients were enrolled: 5 males and 28 females, mean age 57 years, mean disease onset 24 years. At omalizumab discontinuation, 88% were oral corticosteroids-dependent with annual mean rate of 4.0 clinically significant exacerbations, 0.30 exacerbations needing emergency room visits or hospitalization; absenteeism due to disease was 10.4 days per patient. Switch to mepolizumab improved all clinical outcomes, reducing total exacerbation rate (RR = 0.06, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.14), oral corticosteroids -dependent patients (OR = 0.02, 95% CI 0.005 to 0.08), and the number of lost working days because of uncontrolled disease (Δ = -7.9, 95% CI -11.2 to -4.6). Pulmonary function improved, as well as serum IgE, fractional exhaled nitric oxide and eosinophils decreased. Mean annual costs were € 12,239 for omalizumab and € 12,639 for mepolizumab (Δ = € 400, 95% CI -1,588 to 2,389); the increment due to drug therapy (+ € 1,581) was almost offset by savings regarding all other cost items (- € 1,181). Conclusions: Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, not controlled by omalizumab, experienced comprehensive benefits in asthma control by switching to mepolizumab. These relevant improvements were burdened by only very slight increases in economic costs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 751-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munira Essat ◽  
Sue Harnan ◽  
Tim Gomersall ◽  
Paul Tappenden ◽  
Ruth Wong ◽  
...  

The aim of this review was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measured in a clinical setting for the management of asthma in adults.13 electronic databases were searched and studies were selected against predefined inclusion criteria. Quality assessment was conducted using QUADAS-2. Class effect meta-analyses were performed.Six studies were included. Despite high levels of heterogeneity in multiple study characteristics, exploratory class effect meta-analyses were conducted. Four studies reported a wider definition of exacerbation rates (major or severe exacerbation) with a pooled rate ratio of 0.80 (95% CI 0.63–1.02). Two studies reported rates of severe exacerbations (requiring oral corticosteroid use) with a pooled rate ratio of 0.89 (95% CI 0.43–1.72). Inhaled corticosteroid use was reported by four studies, with a pooled standardised mean difference of −0.24 (95% CI −0.56–0.07). No statistically significant differences for health-related quality of life or asthma control were found.FeNOguided management showed no statistically significant benefit in terms of severe exacerbations or inhaled corticosteroid use, but showed a statistically significant reduction in exacerbations of any severity. However, further research is warranted to clearly define which management protocols (including cut-off points) offer best efficacy and which patient groups would benefit the most.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document