DEEP SEDATION: USE OF TARJET CONTROL INFUSION VERSUS ADMINISTRATION OF PROPOFOL IN CONTINUOUS PERFUSION DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF BRONCOSCOPIES

Author(s):  
Blanca De Vega Sanchez ◽  
Ignacio Lobato Astiárraga ◽  
Carlos Disdier Vicente ◽  
Ana Maria Andrés Porras ◽  
Stefania Soldarini ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
ROBERT FINN
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Medina-Prado ◽  
JM Sempere ◽  
S Baile-Maxía ◽  
M Bozhychko ◽  
C Mangas-Sanjuán ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 056-061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nieves Vanaclocha ◽  
Vicente Chisbert ◽  
Vicent Quilis ◽  
Federico Bilotta ◽  
Rafael Badenes

AbstractSedation is an essential therapeutic strategy in the care of neurocritical patients. Intravenous sedative agents are the most widely used, with promising alternatives (dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and volatile agents) to propofol and midazolam arising. Studies designed to evaluate superiority and avoid biases are required. A neurological awakening test is safe in most patients. Potential risks and benefits of limiting deep sedation and daily interruption of sedation in these patients remain unclear. The aim of this review was to report recent clinical evidence on sedation in this subgroup of patients, focusing on its effects on clinical prognosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document