Effect of anti-IL5 treatment on symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis, otitis and hearing loss in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjam I. Wiegman ◽  
Johannes A. Kroes ◽  
Akke-Nynke Van Der Meer ◽  
Rolof G. P. Gijtenbeek ◽  
Kim De Jong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Eosinophilic Asthma ◽  
Severe Eosinophilic Asthma

scholarly journals Efficacy of mepolizumab for patients with severe asthma and eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takanori Numata ◽  
Katsutoshi Nakayama ◽  
Hirofumi Utsumi ◽  
Kenji Kobayashi ◽  
Haruhiko Yanagisawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Severe Asthma ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Systemic Corticosteroid ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Eosinophilic Asthma ◽  
Severe Eosinophilic Asthma ◽  
Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Abstract Background Several major randomized control studies have demonstrated that mepolizumab, an anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody, is effective for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who show exacerbation or require systemic corticosteroid maintenance therapy. However, the predictive factors of the response to mepolizumab other than blood eosinophil count are unclear in clinical practice. Objective To elucidate the predictive factors of the response to mepolizumab for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Methods From July 2016 to December 2017, 28 patients with severe asthma received mepolizumab in our hospital. To determine the predictive factors, we retrospectively evaluated patient characteristics, comorbidities, biomarkers, pulmonary function, maintenance dose of systemic corticosteroids and number of exacerbations. Results The response rate to mepolizumab treatment was 70% (19/27; one pregnant woman was excluded from analysis). Compared with 11 patients without eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS), 16 patients with ECRS showed significantly improved systemic corticosteroid-sparing effects [− 71.3 ± 37.0% vs − 10.7 ± 20.1%, P = 0.006], change from baseline FeNO [− 19 ± 57 (%) vs 30 ± 77 (%), P = 0.023] and symptoms [14 patients (88%) vs five patients (45%), P = 0.033]. ECRS was identified as a predictive factor of the response to mepolizumab in a multivariate logistic regression analysis [odds ratio = 22.5, 95% CI (1.5–336), P = 0.024]. Of the eight patients previously administered omalizumab, five responded to mepolizumab. Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B IgE results were negative in 80% of responders (P = 0.14). Conclusion Both groups showed improved symptom scores and a decreased number of exacerbations. Mepolizumab substantially improved the clinical variables of patients with eosinophilic asthma complicated with ECRS.

scholarly journals Mepolizumab improves sino-nasal symptoms and asthma control in severe eosinophilic asthma patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps: a 12-month real-life study

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 175346662110093
Author(s):  
Aikaterini Detoraki ◽  
Eugenio Tremante ◽  
Maria D’Amato ◽  
Cecilia Calabrese ◽  
Claudia Casella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Asthma Control ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Eosinophilic Asthma ◽  
Severe Eosinophilic Asthma ◽  
Nasal Symptoms ◽  
Asthma Patients ◽  
Nasal Cytology ◽  
Snot 22

Background: Severe eosinophilic asthma is frequently associated to chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) that contribute to poor asthma control. Mepolizumab is an anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody, approved for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. A limited number of studies have assessed the efficacy of mepolizumab on CRSwNP in severe asthmatics. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of mepolizumab on sino-nasal symptoms, polyp growth and asthma control in severe eosinophilic asthma patients with CRSwNP in real life. Methods: In this study 44 severe eosinophilic asthma patients with CRSwNP were treated with mepolizumab (100 mg q4w) for 1 year. The following outcomes were assessed before (T0), after 6 (T6) and 12 months (T12) of treatment: sino/nasal outcome test (SNOT-22), Total Endoscopic Nasal Polyp Score (TENPS), %FEV1 (FEV1/FEV1 predicted) and Asthma control test (ACT). Blood eosinophil count, exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) and prednisone intake were measured. In a subgroup of patients, nasal cytology was performed before (T0), after 6 (T6) and after 12 months (T12) of treatment with mepolizumab. Results: We reported a significant reduction of SNOT-22 [from 51.5 ± 21.2 at baseline (T0) to 31.70 ± 17.36 at T6 and 29.7 ± 21.5 at T12 (T0–T12 p < 0.001)] and a decrease of TENPS (from 2.88 ± 3.07 to 1.70 ± 2.37 and 1.77 ± 2.56 at T0, T6 and T12, respectively, T0–T12 p = 0.99). A significant improvement of %FEV1, ACT and a decrease in blood eosinophils and mean prednisone intake were also reported. No statistically significant decreasing trend was measured for FENO. Nasal cytology findings suggest a significant reduction of eosinophil percentage following mepolizumab treatment (from 16.8 ± 7.2% to 3.6 ± 6.2% and 0.8 ± 2.4% at T0, T6 and T12 respectively, T0 to T12: p < 0.001). Conclusions: Mepolizumab improves sino-nasal and asthma symptoms and reduces polyp growth in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and concomitant CRSwNP in real life. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Effect of Benralizumab in Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Case Series

2020 ◽  
pp. 194589242097835
Author(s):  
Chandala Chitguppi ◽  
Prachi Patel ◽  
Alan Gandler ◽  
Kira Murphy ◽  
Tawfiq Khoury, MD ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Act Scores ◽  
Eosinophilic Asthma ◽  
Severe Eosinophilic Asthma ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Snot 22 ◽  
Sinonasal Symptoms

Objective To analyze the effect of benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma (SA) and chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps (CRSwP). Methods Retrospective review of patients with both SA and CRSwP that were treated with benralizumab. Asthma controlled test (ACT), pulmonary function metrics (FEV1), Meltzer endoscopic polyp scores, SNOT-22 scores, were collected before and after at least 4 months of benralizumab therapy. Results 23 patients were included. The mean age at the time of enrollment into benralizumab therapy was 50.47 ± 17.3 years and majority (65.2%, n = 15) were males. Pulmonary Effects: In comparison to baseline ACT, scores at four months showed significant improvement (p = 0.03). In those with pre and post spirometry measurements, mean FEV1 showed significant increase following benralizumab therapy (p = 0.04) with a mean increase of 547 mL ± 597 mL following therapy. Sinonasal Effects: 78.5% of subjects on benralizumab had a significant improvement in sinonasal symptoms (p = 0.009) based on their SNOT-22 scores. Additionally, there was an improvement in endoscopic polyp scores, although not statistically significant, following benralizumab therapy (p = 0.2) with 54.5% patients showing improvement. Conclusion Usage of benralizumab in patients with SA and CRSwNP can lead to significantly improved asthma control, lung function, and sinonasal quality of life. Additionally, in this patient population, there was a subset of patients that showed a significant reduction in polyp burden.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document