scholarly journals HER2 testing on core needle biopsy specimens from primary breast cancers: interobserver reproducibility and concordance with surgically resected specimens

BMC Cancer ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Tsuda ◽  
Masafumi Kurosumi ◽  
Shinobu Umemura ◽  
Sohei Yamamoto ◽  
Takayuki Kobayashi ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 220-224
Author(s):  
S. Hussein ◽  
K. Kapila ◽  
I.M. Francis ◽  
S.S. George ◽  
E.O. Kehinde

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39
Author(s):  
Taher Abdullah Hawramy ◽  
Dara Ahmed Mohammed ◽  
Hasan Abdullah Ahmed

Breast cancer is the global health problem. It is the highest prevalent site-specific cancer in women throughout the world and the most common reason of death in middle age women,  following lung cancer. Up to 5% of breast cancers are caused by inheritance. Male breast cancer accounts for less than 1%. Mammography is the first imaging study to evaluate breast abnormalities, Ultrasound is particularly useful in young women with dense breasts. Core needle biopsy permits the analysis of breast tissue architecture and whether invasive cancer is present. To compare core needle biopsy and imaging, the accuracy of each modality for purpose of the diagnosis and their impact on preoperative planning before surgical treatment. A retrospective cohort study was performed in 70 cases of breast cancer during 2015-2017 at Slemani Breast Center/ Kurdistan region. Inclusion criteria any patient with diagnosed with breast cancer for whom core biopsy and imaging techniques (ultrasound and mammography) were done, Age 25 years and above. Exclusion criteria, a patient with breast mass who did not underwent: one of the two modalities, Age below 25 years, pregnant women. In the current study: mean age/year for the  participants were Mean age = 51.34 year ± 12.85 SD), Sixty-nine cases were female and one male. By core biopsy (97.1%) is positive for malignancy. In this study: results about 34.28% of BIRADS V (ultrasound)lesions proved to be positive for malignancy by core biopsy, 1.43% of BIRADS V were negative for malignancy and the association was statistically highly significant, for BIRADS III lesions 17.14% were proved as positive for malignancy by core biopsy. About 45.7% of BIRADS V (mammography were positive for malignancy by core biopsy and the associations were found to be statistically highly significant and for BIRADS III 12.85% of lesions were positive for malignancy by core biopsy. There was a statistically significant association between radiological investigation(ultrasound, mammography) and histopathological finding (core biopsy).  


2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 273
Author(s):  
A.E. Pryalukhin ◽  
M.E. Topuzov ◽  
A.I. Urbansky

Radiographics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Hyun Youk ◽  
Eun-Kyung Kim ◽  
Min Jung Kim ◽  
Ji Young Lee ◽  
Ki Keun Oh

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 97-97
Author(s):  
Deepa R. Halaharvi ◽  
Mark H. Cripe

97 Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for 25% of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Core needle biopsy (CNB) has replaced open surgical biopsy for mammographic calcifications. We compare our experience with 8-gauge vs. 11-gauge vacuum assisted core needle biopsy in pure DCIS. We hypothesize that the diagnosis of DCIS with use of an 8-gauge vacuum-assisted core needle will lead to a lower rate of upstaging to invasive cancer at definitive surgical excision compared to 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy. Methods: A retrospective study was performed evaluating all patients who underwent a stereotactic core needle biopsy at our institution for DCIS during 2008-2012.We then compared the upstaging rates between patients biopsied using 8 or 11-gauge biopsy devices. Results: A total of 580 patients underwent STCNB during 2008-2012 at our institution, there were 461 patients excluded as they did not meet inclusion criteria and 119 patients were included. The most common mammographic finding was calcifications in 104/119 (87.4%) and a mammographic mass in 15/119 (12.60%). Biopsy with the 11 gauge needle was utilized in 60 patients and 59 patients with 8-G needle. Factors associated with upstaging were using a smaller 11 gauge needle and a mass on imaging, higher grade and more than four cores obtained on biopsy. There was an upstaging rate of 17/60 (28%) in patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy using a11-gauge needle versus upstaging rate of 7/59 (11.8%) in patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy using 8 gauge needle. We obtained a statistically significant p-value of 0.025. Conclusions: This is one of the few studies comparing upstaging rates from pure DCIS on STCNB using 8 and 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum assisted needles. Our results show that there is a statistically significant decrease in upstaging of pure DCIS to invasive malignancy at excision using the larger 8-gauge needle devices. The clinical implication is that SLNB need not be performed secondary to the low upstaging rate. We recommend that all stereotactic core needle biopsies be performed using the 8-gauge needle devices, and that SLNB generally be omitted for DCIS.


2000 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ute-Susann Albert ◽  
Volker Duda ◽  
Peymann Hadji ◽  
Kay Goerke ◽  
Frauke Hild ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document