scholarly journals Parent–child interaction therapy for preschool children with disruptive behaviour problems in the Netherlands

Author(s):  
Mariëlle E Abrahamse ◽  
Marianne Junger ◽  
E Lidewei Chavannes ◽  
Frederique J G Coelman ◽  
Frits Boer ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iza C.A. Scherpbier ◽  
Mariëlle E. Abrahamse ◽  
Robert G. Belleman ◽  
Arne Popma ◽  
Ramón J.L. Lindauer

Abstract Background: Disruptive behaviour is a common reason that young children are referred to child and adolescent mental health care services worldwide. Research indicates that treatments for child disruptive behaviour where parents are the primary agents of change are most impactful. Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is an effective parent management training program, currently implemented in therapeutic settings within the Netherlands. If parenting skills have been mastered, PCIT has shown to make impactful long-term improvements on parental warmth, responsiveness and effectiveness. The current study aims to increase the proven effectiveness of PCIT by increasing accessibility and impact of the treatment with a focus on strengthening positive parenting skills. To enhance the skills from the therapy, the current study will implement a Virtual Reality (VR) element for additional practice in the home-setting. We expect that if the positive parenting skills are trained by implementing the VR-element, skill mastery will be achieved sooner, treatment completion rates will increase and the parent-child relationship will better, whilst parental stress and child disruptive behaviour will decrease.Methods: Fifteen children (ages 2 to 7 years old) with disruptive behaviour and their parents will followed throughout their PCIT-VR treatment. Using a non-concurrent multiple baseline Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) with three phases, fifteen families will fill out questionnaires weekly, in addition to having pre-, and post-treatment and follow-up measurements to monitor their positive parenting skills, child disruptive behaviour, parenting stress and VR progress. Moreover, the quantitative information and qualitative interviews will be analysed visually and statistically and summarised to provide a complete picture of experiences from both parents and therapists. Discussion: The SCED - with its phased design, randomisation and the opportunity to replicate and assess both individual and group treatment effects - and adaptability of the VR technology are the strengths of the study. The risks of increased type I errors, maturation effects or technological failure will be mitigated with the right statistical support. The current study aims to enhance the scope of the treatment through the additional skill training, ultimately in support of routinely implementing VR at scale within PCIT.


2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bijan Shafiei ◽  
Salar Faramarzi ◽  
Ahmad Abedi ◽  
Ali Dehqan ◽  
Ronald C. Scherer

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianne van der Veen-Mulders ◽  
Barbara J. van den Hoofdakker ◽  
Maaike H. Nauta ◽  
Paul Emmelkamp ◽  
Pieter J. Hoekstra

Author(s):  
Ciara O'Toole ◽  
Rena Lyons ◽  
Catherine Houghton

Purpose Parent–child interaction therapy refers to a number of interventions mediated by trained parents to treat developmental difficulties, including speech, language, and communication. Understanding the experiences of parents who take part in parent–child interaction therapy is a key aspect of determining how this intervention can be implemented successfully. However, to date, there has been limited work on synthesizing parental views of this intervention. Method We used qualitative evidence synthesis that involved searching the literature for qualitative studies addressing the experiences and perceptions of parent–child interaction therapy for parents of preschool children with communication difficulties. We identified 27 studies (from 32 publications) and synthesized the data using thematic synthesis. We appraised the quality of included studies using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) and assessed our confidence in the review findings using GRADE Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual). Results At the beginning of this intervention, parents may have competing demands and varied expectations about the intervention. Their engagement is facilitated when the intervention is tailored to their individual family, their preferences for learning, and when they have a trusting relationship with the clinician. At the end of the intervention, although most parents perceive an improvement in their child's communication and feel empowered to facilitate this, they have concerns about their child's future needs. Conclusions It is important that clinicians explore parents' readiness for this intervention by discussing their needs and preferences openly, and that they facilitate their engagement through a supportive relationship. They also need to consider how parents will transition out of the intervention and continue to support their child's language development. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14978454


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document