scholarly journals Deciding the end of life for patients with disorders of consciousness: a European survey

Critical Care ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P600
Author(s):  
A Demertzi ◽  
D Ledoux ◽  
MA Bruno ◽  
A Vanhaudenhuyse ◽  
O Gosseries ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 258 (6) ◽  
pp. 1058-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Demertzi ◽  
D. Ledoux ◽  
M.-A. Bruno ◽  
A. Vanhaudenhuyse ◽  
O. Gosseries ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (02) ◽  
pp. 157-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gioacchino Curiale ◽  
David Greer

BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manju Sharma-Virk ◽  
Willemijn S. van Erp ◽  
Jan C. M. Lavrijsen ◽  
Raymond T. C. M. Koopmans

Abstract Background Prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC) are amongst the severest sequelae of acquired brain injury. Evidence regarding epidemiology and rehabilitation outcomes is scarce. These knowledge gaps and psychological distress in families of PDOC patients may complicate clinical decision-making. The complex PDOC care and associated moral dilemmas result in high workload in healthcare professionals. Since 2019, all PDOC patients in the Netherlands have access to intensive neurorehabilitation up to 2 years post-injury provided by one rehabilitation center and four specialized nursing homes. Systematic monitoring of quantitative rehabilitation data within this novel chain of care is done in a study called DOCTOR. The optimization of tailored PDOC care, however, demands a better understanding of the impact of PDOC on patients, their families and healthcare professionals and their views on rehabilitation outcomes, end-of-life decisions and quality of dying. The True Outcomes of PDOC (TOPDOC) study aims to gain insight in the qualitative outcomes of PDOC rehabilitation and impact of PDOC on patients, their families and healthcare professionals. Methods Nationwide multicenter prospective cohort study in the settings of early and prolonged intensive neurorehabilitation with a two-year follow-up period, involving three study populations: PDOC patients > 16 years, patients’ family members and healthcare professionals involved in PDOC care. Families’ and healthcare professionals’ views on quality of rehabilitation outcomes, end-of-life decisions and dying will be qualitatively assessed using comprehensive questionnaires and in-depth interviews. Ethical dilemmas will be explored by studying moral deliberations. The impact of providing care to PDOC patients on healthcare professionals will be studied in focus groups. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first nationwide study exploring quality of outcomes, end-of-life decisions and dying in PDOC patients and the impact of PDOC in a novel chain of care spanning the first 24 months post-injury in specialized rehabilitation and nursing home settings. Newly acquired knowledge in TOPDOC concerning quality of outcomes in PDOC rehabilitation, ethical aspects and the impact of PDOC will enrich quantitative epidemiological knowledge and outcomes arising from DOCTOR. Together, these projects will contribute to the optimization of centralized PDOC care providing support to PDOC patients, families and healthcare professionals.


Neuroethics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-102
Author(s):  
Rocco Salvatore Calabrò ◽  
Antonino Naro ◽  
Rosaria De Luca ◽  
Margherita Russo ◽  
Lory Caccamo ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 156-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Nava ◽  
C. Sturani ◽  
S. Hartl ◽  
G. Magni ◽  
M. Ciontu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document