scholarly journals Multicenter phase III randomized trial comparing laparoscopy and laparotomy for colon cancer surgery in patients older than 75 years: the CELL study, a Fédération de Recherche en Chirurgie (FRENCH) trial

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Manceau ◽  
Antoine Brouquet ◽  
Pascal Chaibi ◽  
Guillaume Passot ◽  
Olivier Bouché ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Several multicenter randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopy and conventional open surgery for colon cancer have demonstrated that laparoscopic approach achieved the same oncological results while improving significantly early postoperative outcomes. These trials included few elderly patients, with a median age not exceeding 71 years. However, colon cancer is a disease of the elderly. More than 65% of patients operated on for colon cancer belong to this age group, and this proportion may become more pronounced in the coming years. In current practice, laparoscopy is underused in this population. Methods The CELL (Colectomy for cancer in the Elderly by Laparoscopy or Laparotomy) trial is a multicenter, open-label randomized, 2-arm phase III superiority trial. Patients aged 75 years or older with uncomplicated colonic adenocarcinoma or endoscopically unresectable colonic polyp will be randomized to either colectomy by laparoscopy or laparotomy. The primary endpoint of the study is overall postoperative morbidity, defined as any complication classification occurring up to 30 days after surgery. The secondary endpoints are: 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality, 30-day readmission rate, quality of surgical resection, health-related quality of life and evolution of geriatric assessment. A 35 to 20% overall postoperative morbidity rate reduction is expected for patients operated on by laparoscopy compared with those who underwent surgery by laparotomy. With a two-sided α risk of 5% and a power of 80% (β = 0.20), 276 patients will be required in total. Discussion To date, no dedicated randomized controlled trial has been conducted to evaluate morbidity after colon cancer surgery by laparoscopy or laparotomy in the elderly and the benefits of laparoscopy is still debated in this context. Thus, a prospective multicenter randomized trial evaluating postoperative outcomes specifically in elderly patients operated on for colon cancer by laparoscopy or laparotomy with curative intent is warranted. If significant, such a study might change the current surgical practices and allow a significant improvement in the surgical management of this population, which will be the vast majority of patients treated for colon cancer in the coming years. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03033719 (January 27, 2017).

2015 ◽  
Vol 196 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihisa Matsuda ◽  
Masao Miyashita ◽  
Satoshi Matsumoto ◽  
Nobuyuki Sakurazawa ◽  
Goro Takahashi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111
Author(s):  
Andrei Nicolaescu ◽  
Dragos Margaritescu ◽  
Marius Bica ◽  
Daniela Marinescu ◽  
Tudor Bratiloveanu ◽  
...  

Background. The surgical attitude and the treatment towards colon cancer did not change significantly over the past years. The most important features in achieving oncologically safe surgery are clean resection wedges and the removal of the locoregional lymph nodes. This study aimed to identify if emergency colon cancer surgery has any influence on the type and quality of resections. Methods. We performed a retrospective study of 163 patients admitted in our surgical department with colon cancer who underwent an oncological resection. The patients were divided in two groups: group A included patients that underwent emergency surgery in the emergency and group B included patients undergoing elective surgery. A comparative analysis of intraoperative markers for oncologic quality of resection and for the postoperative outcomes was performed. Results. Of the 163 patients included in this study, 104 were operated in the emergency setting and 59 as elective cases. The preoperative status of patients indicated that emergency cases had a more precarious nutritional and biological status. When the quality of oncologic resection was analyzed, no differences were observed. A higher number of ostomies were created in group A, as well as worse postoperative outcomes. Conclusion. Emergency surgery for colon cancer did not affect the quality of resection, but the morbidity was higher in patients who presented as surgical emergency.


2010 ◽  
Vol 53 (12) ◽  
pp. 1594-1603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas P. West ◽  
Kate M. Sutton ◽  
Peter Ingeholm ◽  
Rikke H. Hagemann-Madsen ◽  
Werner Hohenberger ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 815-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel den Dulk ◽  
Cornelis JH van de Velde

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document