scholarly journals Analysis of total corneal astigmatism with a rotating Scheimpflug camera in keratoconus

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinho Kim ◽  
Woong-Joo Whang ◽  
Hyun-Seung Kim

Abstract Background To analyze mean corneal powers and astigmatisms on anterior, posterior, and total cornea in patients with keratoconus as calculated according to various keratometric measurements using a Scheimpflug camera. Methods We examined the left eyes of 64 patients (41 males and 23 females; mean age 29.94 ± 6.63 years) with keratoconus. We measured simulated K (Sim-K), posterior K, true net power (TNP) and four types of total corneal refractive powers (TCRP). We then used the obtained values to analyze mean K, and corneal astigmatism. TCRP were measured at 2.0 ~ 5.0 mm. Results Mean corneal powers from Sim K, posterior K, and TNP were 49.12 ± 3.99, − 7.39 ± 0.79, and 47.78 ± 4.09 diopters, respectively. For TCRP centered on the pupil, mean K tended to decrease with measurement area (all p < 0.01). While, both mean K and astigmatism measured using TCRP centered on the apex decreased with measurement area (all p < 0.001). TCRP centered on the apex were greater than those centered on the pupil for mean K values calculated using TCRP (all p < 0.001). The proportion of WTR was greatest on the anterior and total cornea. As the measurement area moved to the periphery, the proportion of WTR increased. Conclusions Mean corneal powers and astigmatisms on total cornea with keratoconus change depending on calculation methods and measurement areas.

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 192-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuta Ueno ◽  
Takahiro Hiraoka ◽  
Simone Beheregaray ◽  
Maki Miyazaki ◽  
Mutsuko Ito ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 481-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sepehr Feizi ◽  
Mohammad Naderan ◽  
Vahid Ownagh ◽  
Fatemeh Sadeghpour

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maged Alnawaiseh ◽  
Lars Zumhagen ◽  
André Rosentreter ◽  
Nicole Eter

Purpose. To evaluate changes in anterior, posterior, and total corneal astigmatism in patients after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Methods. We retrospectively included 29 eyes of 23 patients (age 67.6 ± 9.8 years, 13 female, 10 male) after DMEK surgery. The magnitude and axis orientation of anterior, posterior, and total corneal astigmatism before and after DMEK were determined using a rotating Scheimpflug system (Pentacam HR, Oculus). Results. The magnitude of anterior, posterior, and total corneal astigmatism in the central cornea did not change significantly after surgery. Before surgery, we found a significant correlation between the magnitudes of anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism (Spearman’s correlation coefficient rS=0.526, P=0.003), while after surgery this correlation was no longer significant (rS=0.038, P=0.843). There was a significant correlation between the vector difference between preoperative and postoperative posterior astigmatism and the change in corneal pachymetry (rP=0.47, P=0.010). Conclusions. Posterior corneal astigmatism (especially the orientation) and therefore the relationship between anterior and total corneal astigmatism may change after DMEK. This should be considered to improve the accuracy of toric IOL power calculations following phakic DMEK or in combined procedures.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Li ◽  
Xiang Chen ◽  
Suhong He ◽  
Wen Xu

Abstract Background: In the present study, we aimed to analyze the effects of cataract surgery using a 1.8-mm steep-axis clear corneal incision (CCI) on the posterior corneal surfaces based on the keratometry from the rotating Scheimpflug imaging device (Pentacam HR) in candidates for toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: Preoperative and at least 1-month postoperative data measured by Pentacam HR were collected in patients for toric IOL implantation. Surgically induced astigmatism on the posterior cornea (P-SIA) was calculated based on the preoperative and postoperative keratometric data, and the related factors of P-SIA were analyzed. Results: A total of 60 eyes from 56 patients were enrolled. The preoperative anterior, posterior and total corneal astigmatism was 1.58±0.61 D ,0.28±0.22 D and 1.70 ± 0.52 D respectively. The postoperative anterior, posterior and total corneal astigmatism was 1.26±0.68 D, 0.41±0.26 D and 1.30 ± 0.51 D respectively. The astigmatism was significantly decreased on anterior surface (P<0.001, paired t-test) and increased on posterior surface (P<0.001, paired t-test). The mean of P-SIA calculated by Holladay–Cravy–Koch method was 0.34±0.20 D, with 0.5 D or greater accounting for 26.7%. A statistically significant correlation was observed between the P-SIA and preoperative anterior corneal astigmatism (r = 0.29, P=0.024), as well as preoperative posterior corneal astigmatism (r=0.27, P=0.038). Multivariate regression analysis showed the preoperative anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism had a significant effect on P-SIA (F=7.344, P=0.001). Conclusions: In candidates for toric IOL implantation with a 1.8-mm steep-axis CCI, the incision caused a significant reduction of the anterior corneal astigmatism but an increase of the posterior corneal astigmatism. P-SIA could not be ignored, and it played a significant role in SIA, especially in cases with higher preoperative anterior or posterior corneal astigmatism.


2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 423-423
Author(s):  
Virgilio Galvis ◽  
Alejandro Tello ◽  
Camilo A. Niño ◽  
M. Margarita Parra ◽  
Noel Alpins ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document