scholarly journals Consensus on draft OMERACT core domains for clinical trials of Total Joint Replacement outcome by orthopaedic surgeons: a report from the International consensus on outcome measures in TJR trials (I-COMiTT) group

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasvinder A. Singh ◽  
Michael Dohm ◽  
Peter F. Choong
2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 1723-1726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasvinder A. Singh ◽  
Michelle M. Dowsey ◽  
Michael Dohm ◽  
Susan M. Goodman ◽  
Amye L. Leong ◽  
...  

Objective.Discussion and endorsement of the OMERACT total joint replacement (TJR) core domain set for total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) for endstage arthritis; and next steps for selection of instruments.Methods.The OMERACT TJR working group met at the 2016 meeting at Whistler, British Columbia, Canada. We summarized the previous systematic reviews, the preliminary OMERACT TJR core domain set and results from previous surveys. We discussed preliminary core domains for TJR clinical trials, made modifications, and identified challenges with domain measurement.Results.Working group participants (n = 26) reviewed, clarified, and endorsed each of the inner and middle circle domains and added a range of motion domain to the research agenda. TJR were limited to THR and TKR but included all endstage hip and knee arthritis refractory to medical treatment. Participants overwhelmingly endorsed identification and evaluation of top instruments mapping to the core domains (100%) and use of subscales of validated multidimensional instruments to measure core domains for the TJR clinical trial core measurement set (92%).Conclusion.An OMERACT core domain set for hip/knee TJR trials has been defined and we are selecting instruments to develop the TJR clinical trial core measurement set to serve as a common foundation for harmonizing measures in TJR clinical trials.


2018 ◽  
Vol 310 (9) ◽  
pp. 701-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lourdes Maria Perez-Chada ◽  
Jeffrey M. Cohen ◽  
Alice Bendix Gottlieb ◽  
Kristina Callis Duffin ◽  
Amit Garg ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 104-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia D. Franklin ◽  
David Lewallen ◽  
Kevin Bozic ◽  
Brian Hallstrom ◽  
William Jiranek ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 171 (6) ◽  
pp. 1318-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.R. Chalmers ◽  
J. Schmitt ◽  
C. Apfelbacher ◽  
M. Dohil ◽  
L.F. Eichenfield ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1041-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Humphrey-Murto ◽  
Richard Crew ◽  
Beverley Shea ◽  
Susan J. Bartlett ◽  
Lyn March ◽  
...  

Objective.Developing international consensus on outcome measures for clinical trials is challenging. The following paper will review consensus building in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT), with a focus on the Delphi.Methods.Based on the literature and feedback from delegates at OMERACT 2018, a set of recommendations is provided in the form of the OMERACT Delphi Consensus Checklist.Results.The OMERACT delegates generally supported the use of the checklist as a guide. The checklist provides guidance for clearly outlining the multiple aspects of the Delphi process.Conclusion.OMERACT is deeply committed to consensus building and these recommendations should be considered a work in progress.


2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anh Hoang ◽  
Susan M. Goodman ◽  
Iris Y. Navarro-Millán ◽  
Lisa A. Mandl ◽  
Mark P. Figgie ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 1765-1768 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER TUGWELL ◽  
MAARTEN BOERS ◽  
VIBEKE STRAND ◽  
LEE S. SIMON ◽  
PETER BROOKS ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 2496-2502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasvinder A. Singh ◽  
Michael Dohm ◽  
Andrew P. Sprowson ◽  
Peter D. Wall ◽  
Bethan L. Richards ◽  
...  

Objective.To develop a plan for harmonizing outcomes for people undergoing total joint replacement (TJR), to achieve consensus regarding TJR outcome research.Methods.The TJR working group met during the 2014 Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) 12 meeting in Budapest, Hungary. Multiple conference calls preceded the face-to-face meeting. Brief presentations were made during a 1.5-h meeting, which included an overview of published systematic reviews of TJR trials and the results of a recent systematic review of TJR clinical trial outcome domains and measures. This was followed by discussion of potential core set areas/domains for TJR clinical trials (as per OMERACT Filter 2.0) as well as the challenges associated with the measurement of these domains.Results.Working group participants discussed which TJR clinical trial outcome domains/areas map to the inner versus outer core for core domain set. Several challenges were identified with TJR outcomes including how to best measure function after TJR, elucidating the source of the pre- and post-TJR joint pain being measured, joint-specific versus generic quality of life instruments and the importance of patient satisfaction and revision surgery as outcomes. A preliminary core domain set for TJR clinical trials was proposed and included pain, function, patient satisfaction, revision, adverse events, and death. This core domain set will be further vetted with a broader audience.Conclusion.An international effort with active collaboration with the orthopedic community to standardize key outcome domains and measures is under way with the TJR working group. This effort will be further developed with new collaborations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document